[R-P] Milosevic, cristiano ortodoxos (serbio-rusos) y Brzezinsky

Edgar Schmid condornacional en yahoo.com.ar
Vie Feb 9 18:54:44 MST 2007


http://zelonash.narod.ru/serben.html

ORTHODOXY IS JUDGED IN HAGUE

En el sitio de arriba, el Goro puede ver la foto del
general Leonid Ivashov y luego la conferencia que,
perdóneme, no voy a traducir pero Goro sabe más ingles
que yo y no problem.

Pero es interesante como el general Ivashov comienza
la conferencia de solidaridad con Serbia y Milosevic:

"A principios de los '90 el sr. Brzezinsky declaró:
"con el comunismo terminado, es el turno de la
ortodoxia". Así la lucha procede. El propósito de esto
es "cruzarnos" en otra religión y hacer todo más
precisamente para que nosotros olvidemos las raíces
religiosas, culturales-históricas. Y luego
probablemente nosvolvamos obedientes, tal como todos
los satélites de USA y el capital financiero mundial.
El tribunal de La Haya es el más franco ejemplo de
todo esto."

Ya sé, el Goro está pensando como le rompe las
caramañolas un seguidor de Felipe II. Pero en este
caso se trata de un seguidor de Iván el Terrible, de
la misma época.

Edgar

abajo conf. del tovarich general
-------------  

At the beginning of 90th the mister BZHEZINSKY
declared: "With a communism done away, on a turn is
ORTHODOXY". So this FIGHT PROCEEDS. Purpose of it -
"to cross" us in other religion and to do everything
more precisely we forget the religious,
cultural-historical roots. And then probably we will
become obedient, such as all satellytes of the USA and
world financial capital. The Hague tribunal is the
most frank example of all of it.


At the beginning of 90th the mister BZHEZINSKY
declared: "With a communism done away, on a turn is
ORTHODOXY". So this FIGHT PROCEEDS. Purpose of it -
"to cross" us in other religion and to do everything
more precisely we forget the religious,
cultural-historical roots. And then probably we will
become obedient, such as all satellytes of the USA and
world financial capital. The Hague tribunal is the
most frank example of all of it.

What did Serbians do, remainig Kosovo's episode, I
mean Yugoslavian guidance at the head of
Мiloshevich? They reacted on development of
situation. Events developed as follows: on the first
stage at the beginning of 90th Balkan-Kavkazian and
Turkish mafia wanted to open out three trans-shipments
narcopoints - through Macedonia, North Albania and in
Prishtina, on territory of Кosovo. For
realization of this plan they needed to blow up a
situation. The first battle terrorist groups on Balkan
were formed on the money of narkomafia and under
itself guidance. Then they gave the political
colouring and elements of national liberation motion
for it. So it appeared the enough ramified terrorist
network.

How Belgrade must react on it? How any state
respecting itself - to make an effort to liquidate and
crush down this network. But since 90th the last
century, fusing of narcoterrorist network with certain
forces in United States of America happened. Then the
USA and NATO stuck the fight against a genocide and
etc. This union is obvious for us. Narkomafia pursued
the purpose, Americans and NATO - their. Thus there
were "fights" between them. There the Turkish and
German special service tried to show activity,
whereupon Americans crushed down those and other
taking under control this essential district of
Balkan.

Farther they lined up a corridor for Serbians,
designating scopes - from one side, consent on
voluntarily occupation by forces NATO and care from
the political arena of the mode of Мiloshevicha.
If Serbians disagreed on this variant, had to be
expose to bombardments which the ground operation
followed. In this narrow corridor Belgrade was tired
out from 1990 year, it settled for large compromise
concessions. Nevertheless all operation was already
planned and was carried through. Serbians which by
virtue of the state responsibility were under an
obligation to contest terror and destabilization, by
virtue of international obligations they had to
support stability in a region and on the territory,
today on prisoners' box. And ringleaders of terrorists
are free, occupy leading posts, participate in
international conferences, they are adopted in western
capitals solemnly.

In Hague Slobodan Мiloshevich was produced the
prosecutions to 66(!) articles, but no one of these
reasons can prove. He is laid in the genocide of
Albanian population, but there is no one document
where Мiloshevich or someone from his inferiors
- chief of General Staff, Minister and etc - would put
the purpose of ethnic suppression of Albanians. It is
not present! Vice versa, and we demonstrated that -
all orders and directives of Yugoslavian guidance
careful and careful attitude was just expressed toward
the peaceful population, including Albanians. In
addition, Мiloshevich is charged the strategy of
creation of so-called "Great Serbia", but again it
finds no confirmation. Moreover I showed particular
that Мiloshevich, from my point of view, had not
rendered due support serbian Кrayne and Republic
of Serbian. When NATO began to rearm Croatia and
Bosnia, we were ready to help to rearm and render
support to Serbians, but Мiloshevich showed
passivity. He followed like sheep to the embargo on
helping military and military-technical, which was
imposed with our help by the way.

Мiloshevich is imputed excessive application of
military force. We demonstrated the orders of the
Supreme high command General Staff, orders to a 1-th
Prishtina corps where were funny points to my mind.
When the commander of Prishtina corps sets the problem
to army subdivisions - if you were accomplished sudden
assault, before application of weapon you call
attacking to the cease-fire and conduct of
negotiations. It's that what for I criticized the
chief of the general Staff of the general Dragolyuba
Оidanicha. Actually, there is no proofs about
excessive application of military force by Serbians,
and weren't. Such picture is folded practically about
all episodes, that is imputed to Мiloshevich.

But there are such "proofs" which nothing except for a
smile can not cause. For example, the side of
prosecution drove young Albanian to the court which
declared that was shot in Кosovo exactly because
Albanian. And for evidentness he showed a bloodstained
shirt with three enormous openings in area of breast
to the court. Albanian: "That is shot me". And
Мiloshevich asked Albanian: "From what weapon
did shoot you?". Albanian answered looking in the
scrap of paper: "From a large-calibre machine gun".
Мiloshevich asked Albanian to heave up clothes
and to show wounds to the court but he answered that
can not to do it as moslem. Another question followed
a "victim": "From what distance in you did shoot?". -
"From three meters... " Such witnesses testimonies are
on verge of idiocy.

But on the whole, I want to underline it, today in
Hague orthodoxy is judged, is judged the rebellious
Serbian people and this is fully evidently and
obviously. The USA and NATO achieved their objective
at first dismembering large Yugoslavia, then the
Republic Yugoslavia. And today the real state is not
present - Serbia with Montenegro and pretty fragile
relations between them. This is ideal variant for the
West. Yes, Serbian opposition of socialistic and
patriotic orientation comes forward. But as a result
of "velvet revolution" the power in Serbia is the same
saakashvily and the same yuschenko which under full
control.

During listening in a tribunal in Hague I mentioned
some facts, for example, as the mrs. Albright rang to
the main terrorist Hahym Тhacy, required
something from him, supported the relations and etc.
That mrs. Albright already after signing - in fact
instrument of surrenders which our mister Chernomyrdin
presented - collected democratic opposition of Serbia
and Montenegro in Germany - Dzhinzhich, Dzhukanovych
et al. She literally spoke with them rudely and
sharply - you must, we give a money you and etc. So
those leaders in which they inlaid facilities, the USA
control. Dzhinzhich on call of Americans handed over
Мiloshevich to the Hague tribunal as handed over
and other.

In a tribunal witnesses from Russia succeeded - to my
mind, main - to open out a process toward the
prosecution of authentic culprits - the USA and NATO.
On concrete arguments and facts we showed that
aggression took place in regard to Yugoslavia, that a
conspiracy was with narcoterrorist structures, then
the project of dismemberment of Yugoslavia ripened. We
showed that all these negotiations processes, missions
OBSE et al were a screen actually, disguise. This
scenario was carried through. I brought these
arguments over to a process and grew proofs. In the
total a public prosecutor in a court renounced the
records of talks of Albright with the head of
terrorists were represented. A public prosecutor
suddenly demanded to bring some codes(!?) of our
special services. Me and Russia were tried to blame
for that we listened the negotiations of the first
persons of countries of the West. I explained to the
public prosecutor, that a terrorist network was
listened, and who gets there... In the total a public
prosecutor renounced to interrogate me, he was nervous
and assumed causticities. In general the prosecution
does not have arguments.

There were appearances of Primakov Eugeny. But a court
admitted that our testimonies change a situation on
the whole and the new circumstances appeared. Actualy
today we can't hope that will justify
Мiloshevich and those Serbians which together
him is in prisoners' box. To justify Мiloshevich
means to accuse the USA and NATO. A process goes
neither so nor so. Some of defendants sit already more
than three years. To the end of 2006 year court is
going to complete the interrogation of sides, to pass
judgements to 2008. And two years they want to take on
an appeal, although not clearly, where to appeal to.

Мiloshevich does not acknowledge legitimity of
this court, renounces advocates, is on the defensive,
looks confidently. And it seemed to me that
Мiloshevich owns a situation in a court, he had
mass of information, in earnest prepared, refuted
everything and all. That does honour to
Мiloshevich - he undertook guilt of all
inferiors including ministers and generals, ready to
carry responsibility for each the decision. In Hague a
small size Albanians sits, some huligan elements,
while from the Serbian side - in fact - all
military-political guidance - President, Secretary of
Defence, who is Chief of General Staff, Commander of
corps, Deputy minister of Defensive, Voislav Sheshel,
President of Serbia ect. Serbian guidance was planted
in edification to the other leaders including Kuchma
probably and Lukashenko - that expects those who will
dare resist to Americans.



	

	
		
__________________________________________________ 
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí. 
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas, 
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta). 
¡Probalo ya! 
http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas 





Más información sobre la lista de distribución Reconquista-Popular