[R-G] Not traditional conspiracy theorists
deanosor at mailup.net
Sat Sep 11 23:08:30 MDT 2010
2 things. 1. I've known Gary for many years, and i know he does seeks
repsectability, he seeks truth, like some of the 911 Truth people do.
he just disagrees with your supposed scientific version of it.
2. We can all oppose things like the emergency powers act
without believing a specific theory of what went down on 9/11/01.
On Sep 11, 2010, at 7:05 PM, Macdonald Stainsby wrote:
>> I am not going to get into this. I have read much of the material and
>> it is interesting I find the Truth Out people to simply be
>> engaging in
> Of course you won't. Because people like yourself never do. Feined
> disgust, camoflauged in official dribble from sources that would never
> believe in any other case, suffice to help you keep yourself
> and a long way from any rational debate. You know, the ones based on
> evidence, counter evidence, and dissection of what course of action to
> take therefrom.
> I have, due to the lapse of time, come to the place where I wonder how
> valuable these debates are. But then I see only yesterday that
> Obama has
> reinstituted the "emergency powers act" and remind myself why this
> RIP Robert John Enoch.
> Macdonald Stainsby
> moderated radical discussion list:
> In the contradiction lies the hope.
> -Bertholt Brecht.
> Rad-Green mailing list
> Rad-Green at lists.econ.utah.edu
> To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
More information about the Rad-Green