[R-G] [BillTottenWeblog] Monetary Causes of the Immigration Crisis
Suzanne de Kuyper
suzannedk at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 09:58:12 MST 2009
The European Commission fined a giant U.S. computer company for the reasons
enumerated in this article 21 million dollars in 2007. The company paid no
mind and in 2009 was just fined 40 million for the same pratices, carefully.
publicly and on International T.V., the reasons the same as this article,
enumerated, only verbally limited to the the E.U.. Nielie Kroes does not
speak for India, Africa, China, only a choice few of the Western countries,
but the international message is loud and clear, the legal precident writ in
a passionate commitment to law, International Humanitarian Law. Richard
Goldstone will rejoice. Wonder what Congress will say on this decision?
Suzanne suzannedk at gmail.com
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:17 PM, Bill Totten <shimogamo at ashisuto.co.jp>wrote:
> The "Washington Consensus" has wrecked their economies
> by Richard C Cook
> Global Research (June 02 2007)
> There is nothing mysterious about the US immigration crisis, or the
> presence of twelve million or more illegal aliens, or the fact that many
> more are coming to a neighborhood near you.
> They are coming to the US because they are human beings who have to eat.
> They have to eat because they want to live.
> They cannot eat and live in their own countries because there are no jobs.
> There are no jobs because the monetary policies of the "Washington
> Consensus" have wrecked their economies.
> It has wrecked their economies in order to benefit the financiers who are
> behind the Washington Consensus, including the ones in their own countries
> who act as partners in running the lending programs that have caused so
> much damage.
> So what would be more fitting that the bureaucrats and politicians in
> Washington who approved these policies have the immigrants whose lives
> they ruined now greeting them with a nod every morning when they show up
> to mow their lawns, trim their bushes, and repair their homes? Not to
> mention the ones who are clamoring for social services and amnesty, who
> march in street demonstrations, who want to bring their relatives into the
> country with them, who may be starting to claim that the US really belongs
> to them, and some of whom clog the jails of the border states. Then there
> are the ones who send billions of dollars home each year to float the
> economies of their hapless home nations whose domestic economies are so
> dismally poor.
> When I was working at the US Treasury Department there was a joke:
> Question: "What did Davy Crockett say when he looked out over the wall of
> the Alamo?"
> Answer: "Where'd all them lawn maintenance guys come from?"
> Of course it really isn't a joke, especially when you realize the extent
> to which illegal aliens who work for low wages undercut the livelihood of
> so many American citizens. Or when you consider the human misery the
> illegals suffer from dislocated families, hiding from the law, being
> without health care, taking abuse from the criminals who transport them
> across the borders, or living every day in marginal or even subhuman
> The Washington Consensus is the set of monetary and economic conditions
> imposed through "Structural Adjustment Programs" on developing nations by
> the International Monetary Fund, along with similar arrangements imposed
> by the World Bank and other Western political and economic agencies as
> conditions of receiving loans.
> The Structural Adjustment Programs are part of a broader neo-liberal
> economic agenda euphemistically called "free-market reforms" by newspapers
> such as the Washington Post. They are the price paid by countries for
> loans from the international bankers who control large-scale lending to
> their governments.
> Such programs have deep historic roots. The IMF and World Bank date from
> the Bretton Woods agreements at the end of World War Two. While these
> agreements aimed at stabilizing the world monetary system and established
> the dollar as a de facto world reserve currency, they had an underlying
> intent to ensure a positive trade balance for the United States in order
> to maintain the full employment economy brought about by World War Two.
> All the world's nations were expected to be part of this system. When the
> Soviet Union refused to participate, giving precedence in the process to
> US objectives, we declared the start of the Cold War.
> The IMF's Structural Adjustment Programs include privatization of public
> resources and utilities, removal of barriers to investment by
> transnational corporations, the sale of state assets, elimination of price
> controls and subsidies from consumer markets, lowered business taxes, and
> layoffs of state employees. Then there are free-trade agreements such as
> NAFTA which has destroyed Mexican family agriculture.
> The conditions also include a shift of indigenous economies to the
> production of export commodities, away from local self-sustaining
> agriculture and small business. This typically results in a mass exodus
> from rural areas to urban slums and causes poverty, unemployment, and
> crime. These financial programs benefit the local educated elite who work
> with the Western agencies and global corporations but cause a deep and
> permanent stratification among social classes.
> The results have been the same everywhere in the world, particularly among
> the nations of Latin America, Africa, Southern Asia, and Eastern Europe.
> Everywhere the standard of living suffers for a majority of the local
> people. Now a worldwide crisis is developing, as the International Labour
> Organization reports that global unemployment has never been higher.
> Developing nations are susceptible to this exploitation mainly because
> they have no independent monetary system. Most use the US dollar as a
> reserve currency, which then feeds into the fractional reserve banking
> system that is operated by branches of banks headquartered in the US,
> Canada, Europe, and Japan.
> The local nations pay a heavy price for this service, not only through
> payment of market interest rates but also because banking profits leave
> the country for the financial centers elsewhere. Foreclosures and
> bankruptcies also result in a migration of property ownership outside the
> But change is stirring. Venezuela, for instance, has dropped out of the
> IMF and the World Trade Organization and plans to make its own way using
> funding from its oil revenues. Other Latin American nations are beginning
> to work with Venezuela as well as with Russia and China in locating
> alternative funding sources. China is replacing the IMF in some African
> countries by providing loans without conditions using dollars acquired
> from the US in trade.
> It is likely that the Washington Consensus will eventually disappear as
> the rest of the world grows up and realizes that the victor of World War
> Two cannot keep everyone else under their thumb forever. The big question
> is whether the US will go down fighting by attempting to control the rest
> of the world by force of arms, as it is now doing in the Middle East, or
> will it find a way to adapt to the new realities and live as a partner in
> peace with other nations and peoples.
> One thing is certain. The only way to stop the flood of illegal immigrants
> from completely overwhelming the US, Canada, and Europe is for these
> nations to help their less fortunate brethren become prosperous. This
> means abandoning the Washington Consensus and giving up the claims of the
> Western financiers to near-total domination of worldwide resources.
> It means, above, all, helping developing nations establish monetary
> systems that can unlock the productivity of their own people, minerals,
> and land. The problem is that the US and other developed nations
> themselves do not have democratic monetary systems.
> They too are suffering from their own overhang of massive amounts of
> unpayable debt due to their own fractional reserve banking systems that
> benefit the financial elites at the expense of their own populations. In
> fact the average citizen of the more prosperous nations is growing poorer
> every day and coming more and more to resemble economically the immigrants
> who are threatening their jobs.
> Wrapped around the souring of the debt-laden national economies is the
> worldwide financial bubble that every responsible analyst knows must
> deflate. The answer is not the so-called "soft landing", which in reality
> is a "controlled" worldwide financial crash that could last a decade or
> more, with the rich having the inside track on laundering and harboring
> their assets.
> Instead, the author has written a series of recent reports based on over
> twenty years of study with the US Treasury and the monetary reform
> movement. This program explains how the US can establish a new monetary
> system using American constitutional principles that would treat credit as
> a public utility rather than the private playground of the monetary
> controllers. These principles could be applied by developing nations as
> Once these principles were adopted, countries could build healthy,
> productive indigenous economies based on maximizing self-sufficiency and
> participating in regional and worldwide trading systems that benefit all
> parties. Then there would be no reason for millions of people to risk
> their lives, health, and social well-being to flee the deadly poverty of
> their homelands for the marginal poverty they find here. There really is
> no other answer.
> Richard C Cook is the author of We Hold These Truths: The Hope of Monetary
> Reform (2009) and Challenger Revealed: An Insider's Account of How the
> Reagan Administration Caused the Greatest Tragedy of the Space Age (2007).
> He is a Washington, DC-based writer and consultant who, in addition to
> NASA, taught history and worked in the US Civil Service Commission, the
> Food and Drug Administration, the Carter White House and spent 21 years
> with the US Treasury Department. His website is at www.richardccook.com.
> Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
> responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the
> Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of
> sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on
> Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or
> incorrect statements contained in this article.
> To become a Member of Global Research:
> The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles
> on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified.
> The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication
> of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial
> internet sites, contact: crgeditor at yahoo.com
> www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has
> not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are
> making such material available to our readers under the provisions of
> "fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political,
> economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed
> without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
> it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted
> material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission
> from the copyright owner.
> For media inquiries: crgeditor at yahoo.com
> (c) Copyright Richard C Cook, Global Research, 2007
> TO POST A COMMENT, OR TO READ COMMENTS POSTED BY OTHERS, please click
> on the word "comment" highlighted at the end of the version of this
> essay posted at http://billtotten.blogspot.com/
> Rad-Green mailing list
> Rad-Green at lists.econ.utah.edu
> To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
More information about the Rad-Green