[R-G] CBS Pro-Drone Propaganda
Anthony Fenton
fentona at shaw.ca
Wed May 13 22:56:59 MDT 2009
http://www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/05/12-13
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
May 12, 2009
6:45 PM
CONTACT: FAIR
Isabel Macdonald, Communications Director,
212 633 6700 x 310
imacdonald at fair.org
CBS Pro-Drone Propaganda
60 Minutes slights critics of controversial weapons
NEW YORK - May 12 - On May 10, CBS's 60 Minutes presented a remarkably
one-sided report on unmanned Air Force drones firing missiles into
Afghanistan and Iraq. Though the drones have been criticized for
killing civilians in both countries, CBS viewers heard from no critics
of the weapons.
Instead, correspondent Lara Logan seemed awed by the drones from the
very start of the broadcast: "Every so often in the history of war, a
new weapon comes along that fundamentally rewrites the rules of
battle. This is a story about a revolution in unmanned aviation that
is doing just that." She described the drones as "hunting down
insurgents, every minute of every day," and as "one of the most
important planes in the United States Air Force."
Viewers were told that CBS was getting special access: "Many of the
details of this weapons program are classified, but our 60 Minutes
team was given secret clearance and unprecedented access to bring you
this story." The report relied entirely on pilots and the Air Force
chief of staff.
The closest the segment came to airing any criticism at all was when
Logan asked one pilot, Lt. Col. Chris Gough, about his confidence in
the targeting of the missile attacks: "What if you get it wrong?"
Logan asked. "We don't," Gough replied, before finally admitting that
it's "a tough question.... We have the resources to make sure we're
right." Gough stressed the "clarity" of being removed from the
battlefield--the drones are piloted from a base in Nevada--which led
Logan to say, "In spite of that clarity, unmanned planes and Air Force
jets are criticized in Afghanistan for killing innocent civilians,
including an incident just this week that is under military
investigation." Those comments were accompanied primarily by footage
of screaming Afghans protesting in a street, with a brief shot of a
hospitalized child.
Logan added that drone attacks in Pakistan are "blamed for even more
deaths." She reported that the CIA "wouldn't talk to 60 Minutes about
their operations," so she gives the Air Force the last word on the
subject, noting that they argue the drones are "more precise than
piloted planes." Logan seemed to accept this argument: "We got a sense
of that when the Air Force let us sit with Predator pilots in Nevada
while they kept a close watch on U.S. soldiers along the Afghan/
Pakistan border."
It would not have been difficult to find critics of the reliance on
drones in Afghanistan, Pakistan or Iraq--even among those close to the
military. As the Los Angeles Times reported a week before the CBS
segment aired (5/3/09), the House Armed Services Committee had
recently heard testimony from David Kilcullen--a former adviser to
General David Petraeus--who believes the drone attacks take too many
civilian lives. Kilcullen testified that while drone attacks are
suspected to have killed 14 Al-Qaeda leaders since 2006 in Pakistan,
at the same time the weapons have killed about 700 civilians--a 50:1
ratio of innocent victims to targeted enemies.
Such perspectives were missing from the CBS report, leaving 60 Minutes
to air what amounted to little more than military propaganda about
controversial--and deadly--weapons.
ACTION:
Tell CBS that its May 10 60 Minutes report about drone attacks in
Afghanistan and Iraq should have included critics of these weapons.
Excluding such criticisms, while relying so heavily on military
footage and sources, looks more like propaganda than journalism.
CONTACT:
CBS
60 Minutes
524 West 57th St.
New York, NY 10019
Email: 60m at cbsnews.com
Phone: (212) 975-3247
To view the CBS report, go to:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/05/08/60minutes/main5001439.shtml
Please leave a copy of your messages to 60 Minutes in the comments
thread of this FAIR Blog post.
###
FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-
documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work
to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity
in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize
public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints.
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list