[R-G] Road Map to Peace was bogus from the start; Netanyahu cites secret deal with Bush to justify more settlements
Intense Red
intnsred at golgotha.net
Wed Jun 3 16:30:16 MDT 2009
<http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/netanyahu-cites-secret-deal-with-bush-to-justify-more-settlements-1695486.html>
Netanyahu cites secret deal with Bush to justify more settlements
Revelation puts more strain on relations with US as Obama heads for Middle
East
The Israeli government of Benjmain Netanyahu is seeking to deflect
Washington's demand for a total settlement freeze by complaining that it
ignores secret agreements between his predecessors and the Bush
administration that construction in existing Jewish settlements could
continue.
The rift between Mr Netanyahu's government and the US appeared to deepen
yesterday, with a clear declaration by President Barack Obama that a freeze –
including on "natural growth" of West Bank settlements – was among
Israeli "obligations".
But Mr Netanyahu's government – which has made it clear it will not accept a
total freeze – is pushing to restore at least part of the
private "understandings" which it is emerging were struck between Israel and
the previous US administration despite the Bush team's repeatedly stated
opposition to settlement construction.
The Israeli government is arguing that Ariel Sharon, with reservations, agreed
in 2003 to the internationally endorsed Road Map and the withdrawal of 8,000
settlers from Gaza in 2005, only on condition that Israel could proceed with
expansion within the physical boundaries of existing West Bank settlements. A
senior Israeli official familiar with the current talks with the US
said: "When the government of Israel adopted the Road Map... it was based on
understandings reached with the US. It is hard for the US to say we have to
keep to our commitments but ignore the understandings."
The argument was being pressed in talks that Israel's Defence Minister Ehud
Barak was holding in Washington yesterday and is likely to feature in
discussions that the US Middle East envoy, George Mitchell, is expected to
have with the Israeli leadership here on Monday. Israeli officials are braced
for President Obama to repeat his call for a settlement freeze when he makes
his major speech on US relations with the Muslim world in Cairo tomorrow.
Israeli officials also complain that the new team in Washington is making "no
distinction" between settlements in the larger blocs that Mr Bush told Mr
Sharon in 2004 he expected would be in Israeli territory in any final status
deal with the Palestinians, and those elsewhere in the occupied West Bank.
Although the Bush administration later "clarified" that borders were a matter
for negotiation, Israel swiftly assumed it was entitled to continue building
within such blocs.
There is no sign that President Obama sees himself bound by any such covert
oral understandings reached with his predecessor's administration – the
status and durability of which has reportedly been challenged with vigour by
US officials. Mr Obama told National Public Radio: "I've said very clearly to
the Israelis both privately and publicly that a freeze on settlements,
including natural growth, is part of those obligations." He added that
Palestinians also had parallel obligations to improve security and end
incitement.
The senior Israeli official suggested that Mr Netanyahu was ready to reach an
agreement with the US precluding settlement-building that would in his view
prejudice final status negotiations with the Palestinians, and that this
would include not building on E1, the bitterly controversial planned corridor
linking Jerusalem to the large settlement of Ma'ale Adumim. The official
rejected reports of a secret coalition agreement between Mr Netanyahu and his
hard-right Foreign Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, to resume E1-building.
But the Palestinians – and for now at least the US – argue that any further
settlement construction would prejudice negotiations, not least in Arab East
Jerusalem where Mr Netanyahu is determined to keep a free hand in building
settlements. Israel annexed East Jerusalem after the Six Day War in 1967, but
this has never been accepted by the international community.
Haaretz reported yesterday that Washington was "furious" over plans by the
Jerusalem municipality, backed by the Interior Ministry, to build a
nine-storey 200-room hotel in East Jerusalem, just 100 metres from the Old
City, which includes a Palestinian market and kindergarten.
The row has exposed the extent that the Bush administration was willing to
sanction settlement-building, despite its publicly stated policy. Dov
Weisglass, who was the closest lieutenant of then-prime minister Sharon, said
in a newspaper yesterday that the deals originated in a 1990s agreement
on "natural growth" which was further refined in 2002, "though the Americans
completely denied the existence of the understandings". They have been
confirmed by Bush administration assistant secretary of state Elliott Abrams.
Mr Weisglass said it had been agreed between Mr Sharon, himself, Mr Abrams and
another US official, Stephen Hadley, that settlement growth could continue
provided it did not involve new settlements, that no further "Palestinian
land" would be expropriated, that expansion would be within the "existing
construction line" and that public funds would not be used to encourage
settlements. The Bush administration's secretary of state, Condoleeza Rice,
confirmed the agreement, he said.
--
"When the president does it, that means it is not illegal." -- US President
Richard M. Nixon, clearly confusing the president of a republic with a
dictator.
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list