[R-G] [BillTottenWeblog] The Challenge of Faust

[Bill Totten]

by Hans Christoph Binswanger

Science  (July 31 1998)
Volume 281 Number 5377, pages 640 - 641



In Part II of his greatest play, Faust (1832) {1}, Goethe confronts the
promises and pitfalls of the Industrial Revolution and the economic
growth that it generated. As finance minister at the Court of Weimar he
was well placed to comment on these developments, and his insights
remain astonishingly relevant today.

Goethe's protagonist is representative of modern man who, through
science, seeks to subjugate nature and to build up a new economic realm
of freedom and prosperity. Faust's exultation at the "lovely moment"
(verweile doch, du bist so schön) that this would bring expresses the
delight of modern man at the sheer cornucopia of these new riches. But
not all is rosy in this economic garden, for Goethe warns that these
riches may be built upon an unsustainable illusion. After all,
Mephistopheles, who is "the spirit, that evermore denies", is Faust's
business partner! As we ponder whether the new riches that we have
amassed are real or illusory, it is worth taking a closer look at how
Goethe dramatizes this issue.

Faust declares his aims as he looks out upon the sea and its ceaseless
ebb and flow.

Onward it sweeps by courses numberless,
Barren itself, to squander barrenness;
Now swelling, growing, rolling on, it drowns
In desolation leagues of wasted downs;
There riots, wave on wave, with wanton force,
Then ebbs - and nothing's been achieved, of course.
I might despair, to see the aimless way
Such lawless elements exert their sway.
Yet no despair shall my resolve benumb;
Here I might struggle, here might overcome!

Subsequently Goethe shows how, through a combination of economic
activity and technological progress, the subjugation of nature and of
natural forces - symbolized by ebb and flow - is effected. The section
of coastline that Faust had observed is enclosed by a dyke and
transformed into a garden "like an Eden". This subjugation seems
miraculous, like an alchemical process: What had hitherto been
economically worthless has been transmuted into something economically
valuable.

Faust is a vigorous entrepreneur who drives his workers to their utmost.
Yet Goethe realizes that entrepreneurial vision and human labor are not
enough to achieve the great project. Money is required to pay the
workers who, now far from home, have lost their means of subsistence.
However, the limited supply of gold that can be mined is insufficient to
supply the monetary requirement of the project. Faust has taken care of
this with the help of the emperor, that is, the state, by founding a
bank that issues paper money, a currency not convertible into gold:

'Twere hopeless now the flying leaves to stop;
With lightning speed they spread through-out the land.

The state profits from the invention of paper money by using it to pay
its debts. But Faust invests the money in the production of real goods
and through this transaction creates an equivalence between manufactured
goods and paper money, thereby turning valueless paper into an
instrument of real buying power. The potency of this buying power
derives from both traditional and new sources of energy. Faust no longer
relies on human labor alone, but also on newly created, energy-driven
machines because these are more efficient. The change seems almost magical:

Vain all day is their hacking, tearing,
Pick and shovel, stroke on stroke!
Where night-long great fires were flaring,
Stood a bank when morning broke.

The prerequisite for this is the renewed establishment of the laws of
property which grants mankind the right of absolute power over nature,
and now Faust unabashedly proclaims, "Property and dominion I want to gain".

In Faust Goethe thus describes, with historical accuracy, the
establishment of three crucial instruments that enabled economic growth
and served as a motor for further development: (i) The creation of paper
money, which began with the issuance of bank notes by the Bank of
England at the end of the 17th century and forms the basis of our global
system of currency, with its potential for constant expansion; (ii)
James Watt's invention of the steam engine at the end of the 18th
century and the use of coal, which marked the beginning of the
Industrial Revolution; (iii) the Roman property law of "dominium", the
ius utendi et abutendi re sua (the right not merely to use, but also to
consume, one's private property) in the Code Napoleon - the new civil
code created by Napoleon at the beginning of the 19th century. This
concept of ownership provides the necessary legal sanction for the
increasing subordination of nature to the requirements of economic
exploitation.

Goethe not only reveals how Faust, the representative modern man,
realizes this massive project of economic progress, but also shows the
existing and potential dangers associated with it. Human progress
entails curbing nature by constructing an artificial world consisting of
cities, industry, transport, and intensified agriculture, symbolized in
Faust by land reclamation through building of the dyke. With great
insight Goethe tells us that the intervention into the natural
environment that this demands may have unforeseen consequences because
nature reacts according to its own laws, which humans can never entirely
predict. Unintended or unanticipated consequences may wipe out wholly or
in part the successes gained by earlier interventions or cast
retrospective doubt upon them. In Faust Goethe draws attention to three
dangers, in particular: (i) Environmental damage may ensue, exemplified
by a "foul morass" in the reclaimed land, because there is no outflow
for the stinking water. This is a consequence of the short-sighted
construction of the dyke, which has led to the formation of algae and
the silting up of drainage channels. As attempts are made to correct
these problems, new ones are created, which in their turn require
further corrections. Thus Faust's megalomanic project is never-ending!
(ii) To realize his plans Faust needs more and more land. So he drives
out the established population - exemplified in Faust by the old couple,
Baucis and Philemon - from the dunes above the newly embanked land. The
beauty of the natural landscape, which had evolved and been carefully
maintained over centuries - everything we associate with the idea of
"home" - is now ruined. (iii) New risks arise that could completely
destroy Faust's entire project. For example the dam, which Faust sets
against the might of the ocean, could break! Faust knows this, but he
believes that if all available forces are coordinated, then all possible
dangers can be overcome:

Howe'er may rage the angry baffled tide,
Striving to sap, to force an entrance, each
And all rush swiftly to close up the breach.

But Mephistopheles disagrees:

Yet all your labor's spent for us alone.
With your fine dams and bulwarks vast,
You're but preparing a superb repast
For Neptune, the sea-fiend, to feast upon.
You're trumped and done for every way,
Into our hands the elements play,
Destruction onwards is striding fast.

The real danger is that Faust - modern man - will not acknowledge the
need for careful planning to forestall such damage as he pushes on
relentlessly, not seeing what is going on around him. Goethe symbolizes
this blind irresponsibility by Faust's loss of eyesight. In other words,
Faust is so obsessed with his plans to subdue nature that he loses sight
of the realities that may require careful reflection and possibly a
total rethinking of the project. Hence mankind compounds its natural
limitations - its inability to fully understand nature's complexity -
with a blindness induced by hubris.

The Rio conference on "Sustainable Development" (1992) demonstrated that
we live in a finite, limited world and that development is only
sustainable if we take account of these limitations. This is a challenge
for Faust, a challenge for modern man. Here, too, Goethe was prophetic.
In his comments on "Contemplative Judgement" he writes: "Our aim must
be, through contemplation of the ceaseless processes of nature, to make
ourselves worthy to share spiritually in her productions" {2}. In other
words, we must be careful observers of nature's parameters and allow
ourselves, more than ever before, to be guided by them. Instead of
continuing our attempt to dominate nature with linear thinking, we must
cultivate an intuitive sensitivity and responsiveness to her
complexities. Science must respond to this reorientation by developing
the corresponding technology. We need to develop products - consumer
goods, machines, buildings - that produce less waste, last longer, are
recyclable, consume less energy, and fit gracefully into the landscape
and/or model themselves on natural forms (bionics).

This is only possible if economists, too, understand that less can be
more, that in economic production what matters is not so much the amount
produced but its increased utility, and that, accordingly, both
quantitative and qualitative growth can benefit mankind without damaging
nature. Perhaps Faust, or modern man, may never, as Goethe once hoped,
achieve a moment so lovely that he would want to hold on to it forever.
But if we strive to develop a more respectful relationship with nature,
we may very well come closer to creating just such a moment.


Notes:

{1} Translations of Faust in this essay are from Goethe's Faust, Parts I
and II, translated by T Martin [Dent, London, (Dutton, New York), 1954,
reprinted 1971]. This translation was originally published as Johann
Wolfgang von Goethe, Faust, A Dramatic Poem, translated by T Martin
(Blackwood, Edinburgh, London, 1865).

{2} Goethe's Samtliche Werke, in dreissig Banden (Cotta'scher Verlag,
Stuttgart und Tubingen, 1851), 30 Band, S 345.
_____

Hans Christoph Binswanger is professor emeritus in economics at the
University of Saint Gallen, Switzerland. His research has concentrated
on monetary theory, and environmental and resource economics, for which
he has received several prizes. He has authored numerous books including
Money and Magic: A Critique of the Modern Economy in Light of Goethe's
Faust, translated by J E Harrison (University of Chicago Press, 1994).

Institut für Wirtschaft und Okologie, Universitat Saint Gallen,
Tigerbergstrasse 2, CH-9000 Saint Gallen, Switzerland.

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/281/5377/640

TO POST A COMMENT, OR TO READ COMMENTS POSTED BY OTHERS, please click
on the word "comment" highlighted at the end of the version of this
essay posted at http://billtotten.blogspot.com/