[R-G] More Than a Two-Person Race
Anthony Fenton
fentona at shaw.ca
Tue Oct 21 16:34:40 MDT 2008
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT:
Isabel Macdonald
212-633-6700 x 310
imacdonald at fair.org
More Than a Two-Person Race
Corporate media largely ignore other presidential candidates
NEW YORK, OCTOBER 21--While the major-party race for the White House
has been the subject of broad media attention for more than a year,
the corporate media have mostly ignored at least four substantial
third-party and independent candidates for the presidency.
Green Party candidate Cynthia McKinney and Libertarian candidate Bob
Barr are both former congressmembers from the state of Georgia. Their
presence in the White House race, along with independent candidate
Ralph Nader and Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin, would seem
to present an interesting counterpoint to the major-party race between
Barack Obama and John McCain. While the corporate press has apparently
decided that the differences between Obama and McCain are more or less
the only political opinions worth exploring this election season, the
third-party and independent candidates take positions on issues like
drug war policy, Israel-Palestine, civil liberties and military
intervention that differ markedly from the views of either major-party
candidate.
According to a Nexis news database search of the major network
newscasts, McKinney's name has never been mentioned this year on the
networks' news programs, while Barr and Nader's candidacies have
garnered a total of only 31 mentions between them (15 times on ABC, 12
times on NBC and 4 on CBS). Including the Fox network--which airsFox
News Sunday on its broadcast affiliates--yields one passing mention of
Nader, and an interview with Barr (6/29/08). PBS's NewsHour with Jim
Lehrer offered passing mentions of Nader and Barr when they announced
their candidacies (2/25/08, 5/12/08); more recently, the show has
interviewed each of them one-on-one (10/14/08, 10/20/08).
The context in which Barr and Nader have been covered is worth
examining; by FAIR's count, many of the references to the candidates
dealt primarily with the potential effect on the fortunes of the major-
party candidates--i.e., whether a third-party candidate would be a
"spoiler." That accounted for 11 mentions of Barr and Nader.
Passing mentions of Nader or Barr accounted for another 13 mentions;
four of these were joking or mocking references to Nader. (ABC's This
Week includes humor clips from late-night talkshows, two of which
included Nader as a punch line.)
A March 4 report on ABC's Good Morning America discussed the
presidential election with a panel of children, one of whom asked,
"There's like another thing, there's a guy named something Nader…. I
think he's either running for the Green Party or the independents."
ABC correspondent Chris Cuomo misinformed the children by saying
"Green Party."
Actual interviews with the candidates were somewhat rare, but Nader
has appeared on NBC's Meet the Press ( 2/24/08) and Nightly News
(10/20/08), ABC's This Week (6/29/08) and the CBS Early Show
(2/25/08). Barr has appeared on ABC's This Week (7/16/08).
The main question media tend to pose about third-party candidates is
whether or not they will impact the outcome of the election. This is
not at all surprising, given corporate media's preference for focusing
on the horserace aspect of politics. The lesser-known candidates'
generally low standing in the polls appears to make it less likely
that they will play a decisive role on Election Day, but the media's
refusal to open up the political conversation makes this outcome more
or less a self-fulfilling prophecy.
But besides being a process for choosing officials, elections are also
an opportunity to discuss ideas. By ignoring independent and third
party candidates, the corporate media are also helping keep a range of
policy options about key issues that are not espoused by either major
party candidate off the table--including single payer healthcare, a
full withdrawal from Iraq, ending the war in Afghanistan and ending
the death penalty. Democracy Now! (10/16/08) allowed Nader and
McKinney an opportunity to respond to the debate questions posed to
Obama and McCain-- a rare opportunity for such candidates to let
voters hear them alongside major-party nominees.
Numerous policies that are now seen as integral to American life were
first proposed by third-party candidates; Socialist Eugene Debs, for
example, promoted the idea of Social Security in his repeated runs for
the presidency in the early 20th century, and Progressive Henry
Wallace advocated desegregation in his 1948 race.
It's possible that the minor-party candidates in the 2008 election are
suggesting programs that will one day seem as indispensable as Debs
and Wallace's ideas. If so, you won't hear about them from the
corporate media.
FAIR, the national media watch group, has been offering well-
documented criticism of media bias and censorship since 1986. We work
to invigorate the First Amendment by advocating for greater diversity
in the press and by scrutinizing media practices that marginalize
public interest, minority and dissenting viewpoints. As an anti-
censorship organization, we expose neglected news stories and defend
working journalists when they are muzzled.
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list