[R-G] Where's Palestine in the Canadian Election?
Anthony Fenton
fentona at shaw.ca
Mon Oct 13 11:24:48 MDT 2008
~~~~~~~~~~~~~(((( T h e B u l l e t ))))~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
A Socialist Project e-bulletin ... No. 146 ... October 13, 2008
_________________________________________________
Where's Palestine in the Canadian Election?
Kole Kilibarda
Many will certainly remember that incredibly friendly moment, during
the otherwise acrimonious recent U.S. Vice-Presidential debate, when
Republican candidate Sarah Palin reached out to her Democratic rival
Joseph Biden, saying she was: "encouraged to know we both love Israel
and I think that is a good thing to agree on." Arguably, observing the
Canadian election process, one gets the impression that this warm
sentiment would be shared by party leaders north of the border – from
Stephen Harper all the way through to Stéphane Dion, Jack Layton,
Elizabeth May and even Gilles Duceppe – most of whom appear ready to
join Palin (though with varying degrees of enthusiasm) in endorsing
Israeli apartheid in one variety or another.
Injustice's Shinning Allure?
In Canada, we are witnessing another election cycle in which foreign
policy questions have been largely relegated to the proverbial
'backburner.' To the extent that the oppression of the Palestinians
has been an issue, cross-party affirmations of support for Israel have
been widespread. Thus, even Green Party leader Elizabeth May felt
compelled to argue that: "We need to recognize that Israel is the
bulwark of democracy and a healthy society" in the Middle East during
a recent interview. May didn't bother to offer reasons why voters
'need to recognize' this contentious assertion, instead treating
Israeli apartheid as so self-evidently virtuous that she felt no
compulsion to offer evidence to back her claims.
While many small 'l' Canadian liberals might justifiably laugh-off
Palin's Reaganite naïve view of the USA as 'that shinning city on a
hill,' many will nonetheless insist on maintaining a similarly
idealized picture of that other 'city on a hill' – Israel's gleaming
colonial project in the Middle East. For many middle-class liberals,
Israel has served as a symbolic beacon of 'shared democratic values'
in a region of the world that many seem afraid of. For others, the
topic has been 'too controversial,' or 'too complicated' or 'hopeless'
and the preference has been to simply stay quiet. Such (heavily
racialized) predispositions are something that Israel's consul general
in Toronto, Amir Gissin, is trying to play-up in order to convince
residents of the city – by means of a $1-million 'Brand Israel' re-
branding campaign – that Israel is worth another chance.
Of course, one does not need to look far to understand the ability of
Canadian party leaders to ignore Palestine's ghettoes and Bantustans
during this election season. One just needs to consider their
deafening silence on the situation of indigenous peoples here on
Turtle Island and it becomes clear how what Ryerson sociology
professor Alan Sears has identified as 'settler solidarity' functions.
This type of 'solidarity' is something that Israeli brand experts have
apparently picked up on, by promoting North American tourism to Israel
in what are apparently meant to be enticing images speaking directly
to very masculinist (and often pubescent) settler sensibilities.
The campaign has thus included images of everything from 'real Israeli
cowboys,' to the redemptive/Biblical marketing of 'Holy Land' sites,
to the 'hotness' of Israeli women (witness last year's MAXIM feature
on 'The Women of the IDF'). Recent Canadian variations on this
campaign have tried to play-up Israel's alleged 'multicultural
democracy', its 'environmentalism' and its health-care system by
simply omitting the racial differentiation characterizing access to
these.
Meanwhile in Palestine...
The mythmaking quality of Israel's rebranding campaign aside, it's not
like opportunities have been lacking for Canadian party leaders to
condemn Israel's legislated racism and militarized control over
Palestinian life. According to the Palestinian Center for Human Rights
(PCHR), in the month since the Canadian elections' were called the
Israeli military has:
• carried out at least 170 incursions into Palestinian villages,
towns and cities;
• arrested 155 Palestinian civilians (including 30 children);
• injured at least 68 Palestinian civilians (including 16 children),
and transformed three houses into military bases.
Settler militias have also started attacking Palestinian farmers and
burning down olive trees in what has become a yearly occurrence
coinciding with the seasonal olive harvest. There were also the
intense race-riots triggered this past week in the city of Akka
(Acre), after Taufik Jamal and his daughter were nearly stoned to
death by Jewish extremists for having 'provocatively' smoked
'cigarettes' and 'played music' in his car ('violating' Israeli
religious proscriptions on such behavior during Yom Kippur even though
the father and daughter aren't of the same faith and deny behaving in
these 'offensive' ways).
Finally, during this period, PCHR reports that 6 Palestinian civilians
were killed at the hands of Israeli forces, including:
• Naheel 'Awni 'Abdul Rahim, 21, from Qasra village southeast of
Nablus, who gave birth to a dead baby at Hawara checkpoint due to the
restrictions on Palestinian movement imposed by the Israeli military
(September 5);
• Waleed Fareed Waleed Fraitakh, 22, a plumber from Nablus shot by
the Israeli military while returning home after work (September 10);
• an unnamed Palestinian boy shot by the Israeli army in Taqqou'
village near Bethlehem (September 13);
• Suhaib Yasser Ahmed Saleh, 14, from Southern 'Assira village near
Nablus shot through the chest and right leg (September 20);
• Miriam Ahmed 'Ali 'Ayad, 56, killed in Abu Dis, near Jerusalem,
when she was pushed down the stairs of her family home by an Israeli
soldier, splitting her head open as a result (September 20);
• and Yahia 'Atiya Fahmi Bani Monya, 18, from 'Aqraba village
southeast of Nablus, kidnapped by settlers while grazing his sheep,
only for his bullet riddled body to be found later dumped 1km from the
Jetit settlement in an area prohibited to Palestinians (September 27).
In the Gaza Strip, as the PCHR explains, the conditions of siege
continue to take their toll, with health services
"severely affected by the siege...Critically ill patients are still
being denied permits to access vital health services in the West Bank,
Israel and abroad. Water facilities, including access to clean
drinking water, and the treatment of raw sewage continue to be
severely disrupted by fuel shortages. 50-60 million liters of
untreated and partially treated sewage are being dumped into the Gaza
Strip Mediterranean Sea daily, posing a public health risk. Hundreds
of Gazan students are currently unable to resume their university
studies...The Gaza Strip had been suffering from chronic shortages of
fuel supplies, especially cooking gas, and electricity is still being
cut-off for long periods of time."
This is in addition to poverty rates of some 80%, massive
unemployment, and increasing malnutrition that are all attributable to
the blockade. As the PCHR notes:
"despite the Egyptian brokered 'Tahdiya' or truce between Palestinian
resistance groups and Israel that began on 19 June; there have been no
major changes regarding the movements of civilians and goods through
the six Gaza Strip border crossings."
Grabbing Some Votes by Increasing Civilian Pain?
In fact, the only candidate to actually refer to Palestinian civilians
with anything resembling a clear policy preference, was Liberal
candidate Ken Dryden, who during an all-candidates debate in Toronto
chillingly stated that Canada must: "Stop all aid that flows into
Gaza. While that may seem a harsh measure that will hurt Palestinian
civilians... it is the right thing to do at this time." While Dryden
has since 'clarified' that he only meant cutting government-to-
government assistance – on which hundreds of thousands of Palestinians
depend! – his initial comments highlight an almost reflexive
callousness towards Palestinians that is shared by many politicians
currently running for office in Canada.
In fact, Dryden's comments endorsing collective punishment, faithfully
echo the main justification for Israel's blockade of Gaza. The siege
is thus explicitly calculated to impose massive civilian suffering for
the audacity of Palestinians to choose a government through...
ballots!! Dov Weisglass, one of Ariel Sharon's top advisors, clarified
shortly after the 2006 Palestinian elections that the blockade was
intended to be: "like a meeting with a dietician. We have to make
them much thinner, but not enough to die." Last spring Israel's
Deputy Defense Minister Matan Vilnai went further, arguing that
Palestinians were risking a 'shoa' (catastrophe / holocaust) in Gaza
if they continued their resistance.
Moving Forward After Election Day?
Of course, this is not to say that the position of every party in
Canada reflects such racist (even génocidaire?) positions. There are
grassroots currents within the Green Party, the NDP and the Bloc that
consistently push for principled positions on international issues.
However, in cases where parties have taken an official stand – the NDP
and Green Party electoral platforms are the only ones that contain
explicit policy statements on 'Israel and Palestine' – they simply
fail to unequivocally condemn Israeli apartheid, preferring instead to
equate the oppressed and the oppressors. This is often done in a
usually unsuccessful attempt to avoid neo-conservative, rightwing and
racist 'pro-Israel' flak, while simultaneously attempting to placate
social-justice seeking constituencies within their own party. A 'safe'
position thus becomes supporting a 'two state solution' while
remaining silent on the fate of 5-million Palestinian refugees denied
the fundamental right of return or the 1.5-million Palestinian
citizens of Israel living legislated racism everyday.
These silences are especially problematic given that in recent years a
consensus has developed within Palestinian civil society on the best
non-violent method of moving forward with the struggle for justice in
the Middle East – i.e. support for a comprehensive grassroots boycott,
sanctions and divestment (BDS) campaign that seeks an end to Israel's
occupation of all Arab lands (40+ years), the return of refugees (60
years) and the recognition of equal civil and political rights for
Palestinians living in Israel (60+ years).
Concretely, what support for this campaign would mean if translated
into the context of the Canadian political scene, would be to call on
the next government to immediately suspend cooperation agreements with
Israel, including the Canada Israel Free Trade Agreement (CIFTA) and
the Canada Israel Industrial Research and Development Fund (CIIRDF).
These agreements contribute to the over $1-billion dollars in
bilateral trade and over $2-billlion worth of foreign direct
investments linking Israel and Canada (including dozens of security
related joint projects).
However, support for such measures will mean bringing the carefully
constructed, semi-biblical image of Israel fostered within the North
American political imaginary into question. Endorsing Palestinian
perspectives on their dispossession during an election campaign might
also mean that settler politicians in Canada might have to confront
the uncomfortable truth that Canada itself was built on and continues
to depend on the exploitation of lands stolen from the indigenous
peoples of Turtle Island. I guess this is something progressives will
be thinking about long after Election Day, which this year falls right
after the 'Thanksgiving Weekend.'
To learn more about the global BDS visit www.bdsmovement.net or log on
to www.caiaweb.org. •
Kole Kilibarda is an organizer with the Coalition Against Israeli
Apartheid (CAIA). He can be reached at kole at riseup.net.
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list