[R-G] Vanishing Mountains: Coal mining in Appalachia

Anthony Fenton fentona at shaw.ca
Fri Nov 7 17:29:09 MST 2008


November 7, 2008
http://www.dominionpaper.ca/articles/2093
Vanishing Mountains: Coal mining in Appalachia

by Dana Kuhnline

The Dominion - http://www.dominionpaper.ca

Eight hundred thousand acres of land have been destroyed by  
mountaintop coal removal in Appalachia, and hundreds of thousands more  
are slated for the same process. Photo: Vivian Stockman

CHARLESTON, WV, USA–"I say to you, what do you hold so precious in  
your own circle of life that you don't have a price on it? What would  
it be? For me, it's my home. For me, it's Appalachia. For me, it's the  
mountains. For me, it's a whole way of life that they're wiping out  
here, and nobody seems to care."

This is what Larry Gibson has been telling people who make the  
pilgrimage to his home on Kayford Mountain, outside of Charleston,  
West Virginia. A not-to-be-missed destination for any tourists who  
want their hearts broken, Kayford is an island of green in a 12,000  
acre wasteland of mountaintop removal coal mining.

Mountaintop removal coal mining is a type of mining particular to  
Appalachia. The coal lies in thin horizontal seams, stacked up like  
the frosting in a layer cake. In the past, miners tunneled through the  
side of the mountain to scoop out the frosting, but current (and  
cheaper) practices allow giant machines to destroy the entire cake.  
Coal companies use diesel fuel and fertilizer to explode up to 800  
feet of mountain to scoop out the coal. Afterward, some of the rubble  
is piled back where the mountain used to be, and some of it is piled  
into nearby valleys, creating valley fills.

Eight hundred thousand acres of land have been destroyed in this way  
in Appalachia, and hundreds of thousands more are slated for the same  
process. The valley fills and loosened rock leach out heavy metals  
like selenium. According to fisheries biologist A. Dennis Lemly, these  
selenium discharges have affected fish in Mud River, West Virginia;  
fish have been found with spiral spines and two eyes on the same side  
of their heads.

Coal processing leaves billions of gallons of toxic waste - called  
sludge - behind, a witch's brew of mercury, diesel from the  
explosives, and dozens of other deadly chemicals which are placed into  
unlined earthen structures called slurry dams or injected underground,  
often into abandoned underground coal mines. These toxins are free to  
seep into the ground water of nearby communities.

One of these communities is Prenter, West Virginia, where a group of  
residents have started to organize to fight for clean water. According  
to a casual health survey they undertook, a staggering 97 per cent of  
Prenter residents have gallbladder disease. Brain tumours, thyroid  
cancer, and skin conditions are also common. In many homes in Prenter,  
the water leaves the faucet black or orange, and vegetables rot in the  
garden. A short video on YouTube features Prenter bathtub water  
tarnishing a penny. Citizens in Prenter have been lobbying state and  
national officials for nearly a year to get help, but officials say  
they can’t do anything – because they can’t confirm coal has anything  
to do with the problems the community is facing.

However, in a similar community in Mingo County, also located near  
known slurry injection sites, residents are also suffering from rare  
disease patterns. Ben Stout, an aquatic biologist at West Virginia’s  
Wheeling Jesuit University, has discovererd the same chemicals found  
in coal slurry – including aluminum, arsenic, beryllium, and sulfuric  
acid - at rates thousands of times the legal limit in well water.

I learned about mountaintop removal coal mining in 2005, when I moved  
to West Virginia to work on oral history and arts preservation. I  
unknowingly rented a house next to the state's largest mountaintop  
removal coal mining site, Hobet 21. In my first week, I was hiking  
behind my new house when suddenly the mountain stopped. I was at the  
edge of a cliff, and as far as I could see was grey rubble. A crane 13  
stories tall (nicknamed Big John) scooped away loose rock to reveal a  
flat black surface.

People I interviewed about the mine always said they hated it, but  
what could they do? This is one of the poorest areas in West Virginia,  
which in 2004 was ranked the 48th poorest state in the US, and money  
is money. The economy of West Virginia is built on coal. According to  
the West Virginia Office of Miners' Health Safety and Training, coal  
mining in West Virginia provides about 20,000 jobs in coal production,  
with 40,000 jobs total if you count jobs indirectly created by the  
mining industry. In the 1970s, before strip mining became prevalent,  
there were over 120,000 mining jobs in West Virginia. Currently,  
direct and indirect coal mining jobs make up about five per cent of  
the labour force of West Virginia, which produces 15 per cent of coal  
in the US, and makes up 50 per cent of the US' coal exports. Coal  
mining is one of few industries that exists here.

Mountaintop removal coal mining could never happen in a rich  
community. For example, in Greenbrier County, West Virginia, a wealthy  
county with little coal mining history only a few hours away, members  
of the second home community vehemently fought a proposed wind farm on  
their mountains because of the damage to their viewshed and second  
home market. The same government officials that have refused to help  
Prenter citizens get clean water have supported the Greenbrier  
citizens in their fight to keep their view clear of unsightly windmills.

Environmentalists working on this issue quickly realize that a few  
laws are not going to fix this problem. The mono-economy of Appalachia  
needs to be diversified, and the value system that tells us what is  
worth money and what is not needs a second look.

Coal is profitable because it externalizes the costs of extraction and  
burning onto the surrounding communities and the government. Coal  
trucks tear up area roads; abusive employee treatment leads to  
disabled workers; bad water and air pollution lead to sickness. These  
are only a few of the costs government and communities must absorb in  
addition to the tax cuts and subsidies already provided to big coal.  
Even if we could put a price tag on the nearly 500 mountains that have  
been destroyed in Appalachia so far, the environmental costs alone  
would make the price of mountaintop removal coal too high.

“The coal company always talks about jobs - there are no jobs on a  
dead planet,” Judy Bonds, the Goldman Award-winning legend with Coal  
River Mountain Watch mining often says.

“I know that our community survived before there was electricity,”  
adds Virginia activist Kathy Selvage of Southern Appalachian Mountain  
Stewards, “But I don’t think we can survive without clean water, or  
air to breathe.”

About 12 per cent of total energy consumption in Canada comes from  
coal (it's about 50 per cent in the US), and about 40 per cent of the  
coal Ontario Power Generation uses is Appalachian coal. The fact is,  
we live in a world where blow drying your hair in Canada blows up  
family cemeteries and pristine streams in Appalachia. Deforestation  
and coal processing in Appalachia is increasing the effects of global  
warming in Canada.

In the words of English journalist and activist George Monbiot,  
“Everything I have fought for and that all campaigners for social  
justice have ever fought for - food, clean water, shelter, security -  
is jeopardized by climate change.”

Appalachian author Ann Pancake has said, "What we are doing to this  
land is not only murder; it is suicide."

“Something must be done. You have got to do something,” Larry Gibson  
tells his visitors.

The Coal River Wind Project is trying to do something. The group is  
attempting to block a 6,600 acre mountaintop removal permit by  
proposing 440 megawatts of industrial scale wind on the mountain  
instead.

Both Barack Obama and John McCain have publicly stated their  
opposition to mountaintop removal coal mining, yet both continue to  
support 'clean coal.’ The 'clean' in 'clean coal' refers to carbon  
sequestration at power plants and not to the extraction process. Thus,  
'clean coal' can still come from the ripped off mountain tops in  
Appalachia.

Neither candidate has expressed support for the Clean Water Protection  
Act, which would curtail the use of most valley fills in Appalachia.  
This bill currently has 152 co-sponsors in the House but has not yet  
been introduced in the Senate.

Dana Kuhnline lives in West Virginia where she works for The Alliance  
for Appalachia, a coalition of 13 non-profits with the goal of ending  
mountaintop removal and creating a just sustainable Appalachia.


More information about the Rad-Green mailing list