[R-G] [BillTottenWeblog] The Anti-Empire Report

[Bill Totten]

Read this or George W Bush will be president the rest of your life

by William Blum

www.killinghope.org (March 29 2008)


Propaganda as an Olympic competition

The latest protests in Tibet and crackdown by Chinese authorities have
brought up the usual sermonizing in the West about Chinese government
oppression and illegitimate control of the Tibetans. Although I have
little love for the Chinese leaders - I think they run a cruel system -
some proper historical perspective is called for here.

Many Tibetans regard themselves as autonomous or independent, but the
fact remains that the Beijing government has claimed Tibet as part of
China for more than two centuries. The United States made its position
clear in 1943:

"The Government of the United States has borne in mind the fact that the
Chinese Government has long claimed suzerainty over Tibet and that the
Chinese constitution lists Tibet among areas constituting the territory
of the Republic of China. This Government has at no time raised a
question regarding either of these claims." {1}

After the communist revolution in 1949 US officials tended to be more
equivocal about the matter.

Even as the Chinese were attacking Tibetan protestors, New York City
Police were beating up and literally threatening to kill "Free Tibet"
protestors in front of the United Nations. It's all on video. {2}

The Washington Post recently ran a story about how the Chinese people
largely support the government suppression of the Tibetan protesters.
The heading was: "Beijing's Crackdown Gets Strong Domestic Support.
Ethnic Pride Stoked by Government Propaganda." The article spoke of how
Beijing officials have "educated" the public about Tibet "through
propaganda". {3}  That's a rather interesting concept. Imagine the Post
or any other American mainstream media saying that those Americans who
support the war in Iraq do so because they've been educated by
government propaganda ... Ditto those who support the war in Afghanistan
... Ditto those who supported the bombing of Yugoslavia ... Ditto scores
of other US invasions, bombings, overthrows, and miscellaneous war
crimes spanning more than half a century.

Now Germany's foreign minister has warned China that its response to the
crisis in Tibet may jeopardize the Summer Olympics in Beijing. "The
German federal government is saying to the Chinese government: be
transparent! We want to know exactly what is going on in Tibet." He also
warned China to avoid any violent measures in its standoff with Tibetan
protesters. {4} Human rights organizations have demanded that Coca-Cola,
Visa, General Electric, and other international companies explain their
dealings with the Chinese government as it prepares to host the Summer
Games. The French Foreign Minister floated the prospect of boycotting
the Games' opening ceremony because of China's response to the protests.
And the president of the European Parliament said European countries
should not rule out threatening China with a boycott if violence
continued in Tibet. {5}

It's nice to see the West's conscience stirred up. They're real good
about such things, when the target is not one of their own, particularly
against a communist country. In 1980, 62 nations - including the United
States, Canada, West Germany, Japan, and Israel - boycotted the Olympics
in Moscow because the previous year the Soviet Union had invaded
Afghanistan. Four years later, the Olympics were held in Los Angeles.
Not a single member of "The Free World" boycotted it, even though the
previous year the United States had invaded Grenada and overthrown the
government, with a lot less political justification than the Russians
had for invading Afghanistan. The Grenada invasion was as much lacking
in legality and morality as the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

The Soviet Union and thirteen of its allies stayed away from the Los
Angeles Olympics, but when the Russians announced the boycott they cited
only security concerns. President Reagan had declared at the time of the
invasion that Grenada was "a Soviet-Cuban colony being readied as a
major military bastion to export terror and undermine democracy, but we
got there just in time" {6}. One would think that Moscow would have
mentioned Grenada at least for the satisfaction of throwing Afghanistan
and the 1980 boycott in Washington's face. The fact that the Russians
made no such mention was a measure of how unconcerned they were about
the tiny island nation and its alleged future as a major Soviet military
bastion. The magnitude and variety of Reagan administration lies that
accompanied the invasion of Grenada may have stood as a record until the
Bush administration topped it in Iraq twenty years later. {7}


"In politics, as on the sickbed, people toss from one side to the other,
thinking they will be more comfortable". --Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

A recurring theme of Hillary Clinton's campaign for the presidency has
been that she has more of the right kind of experience needed to deal
with national security and foreign policy issues than Barack Obama. The
latest play on this is her advertisement telling you: It's three am and
your children are safe and asleep; but there's a phone in the White
House and it's ringing; something really bad is happening somewhere; and
voters are asked who they want answering the phone. Of course they
should want Hillary and her marvelous experience. (If she's actually
explained what that marvelous experience is, I missed it. Perhaps her
near-death experience in Bosnia?)

Typical of Clinton's growing corps of conservative followers, the
Washington Times recently lent support to this theme. The right-wing
newspaper interviewed a group of "mostly conservative retired [military]
officers, industry executives and current defense officials", who cite
Mr Obama's lack of experience in national security. {8}

And so it goes. And so it has gone for many years. What is it with this
experience thing for public office? It was not invented by Hillary
Clinton. If I need to have my car repaired I look for a mechanic with
experience with my particular car. If I needed an operation I'd seek out
a surgeon with lots of experience performing that particular operation.
But when it comes to choosing a person for political office, the sine
qua non consideration is what their politics are. Who would you choose
between two candidates - one who was strongly against everything you
passionately supported but who had decades of holding high government
positions, or one who shared your passion on every important issue but
had never held any public office? Is there any doubt about which person
almost everyone would go for? So why does this "experience" thing keep
coming up in so many elections?

A recent national poll questioned registered voters about the
candidates' "approach to foreign policy and national security". 43%
thought that Obama would be "not tough enough" (probably a reflection of
the "experience" factor), while only three percent thought he'd be "too
tough". For Clinton the figures were 37% and nine percent. {9} The
evidence is overwhelming that decades of very tough - nay, brutal - US
policies toward the Middle East has provoked extensive anti-American
terrorism; the same in Latin America in earlier decades {10}, yet this
remains an alien concept to most American voters, who think that
toughness works (even though they know it doesn't work on Americans -
witness the reaction to 9/11).

John McCain, who is proud to have dropped countless bombs on the people
of Vietnam, who had never done him or his country any harm until he and
his country invaded them, who now (literally) sings in public about
bombing the people of Iran, and who tells us he's prepared to remain in
Iraq for 100 years, is still regarded as "not tough enough" by sixteen
percent and "too tough" by only 25%. What does it take to convince
Americans that one of their leaders is a bloody psychopath? Like the two
psychos he may replace. How has 225 years of our grand experiment in
democracy wound up like this? And why is McCain regularly referred to as
a "war hero"? He was shot down and captured and held prisoner for more
than five years. What's heroic about that? In most other kinds of work,
such a record would be called a failure.

Winston Churchill said that "The best argument against democracy is a
five-minute conversation with the average voter". And if that doesn't do
it for you, try a five-minute conversation with almost any American
politician. This thing called democracy continues to be used as a
substitute for human liberation.

One parting thought about Obama: Is he prepared to distance himself from
Reverend Martin Luther King as he has from his own minister, Reverend
Jeremiah Wright? King vehemently denounced the Vietnam War and called
the United States "the most violent nation in the world". Like Wright,
he was strongly condemned for his remarks. As T S Eliot famously
observed: "Humankind can not bear very much reality".


Do Americans live in a democracy or in an economy?

The Dow Jones industrial average of blue-chip stocks:

On March 19 it increased 420 points.

On March 20 it went down 293 points.

On March 21 it increased 261 points.

Do the economic fundamentals change dramatically overnight?

Or is our economic system as psycho as John McCain?

The US economy is teetering on the edge of recession because for a long
time banks and others were selling mortgages at subprime rates to people
who were bad credit risks. They sold them the mortgages anyhow because
they knew they could combine these questionable mortgages into bundles
and sell them to financial speculators higher up on the food chain. The
higher speculators in turn sold bundles of various debt instruments to
other speculators. The supposedly objective credit rating agencies told
everyone that these firms and their bundles were good investments, but
the credit rating agencies in fact had played a role themselves in
putting some of the bundles together. This convoluted system created
such complex and deliberately opaque financial vehicles - all devised to
make someone a buck every time they swapped some paper - that they long
ago had lost track of the papers' true value. We had a financial system
terminally choked with worthless paper "instruments". A genuine house of
cards. It fell.

We go from the dot-com bubble to the stock market bubble to the Enron
bubble to the housing bubble to the credit bubble ... capitalist growth
increasingly being driven by speculative bubbles, which invariably
burst, and with each burst many thousands lose jobs, and, currently,
their homes.

Can anyone say with any kind of precision how the price of gasoline at
the pump is arrived at each day? And exactly what the relationship is,
if any, between that price and the price of oil on the mercantile
exchanges which are regularly announced as the "official" price of a
barrel of oil? And why the speculators who spend their days playing
buy-and-sell games at these exchanges - while having no actual personal
contact with barrels of oil - should have such a profound effect upon
our daily lives? And why gasoline is priced at $3.40.9 per gallon? Or
$3.24.9 per gallon? That's 9/10 of a penny.

And while we're at it ... Why is almost everything in American society
priced at amounts like $9.99, $99.99, or $999.99? Or $3.29 or $17.98?

"If all economists were laid end to end, they would not reach a
conclusion". --George Bernard Shaw

Marketing is about creating emotional, even irrational bonds between
your product and your target audience. There was a time when capitalism
strove, much more than now, to meet the real needs of people. Now its
forte is creating artificial needs with advertising and filling them,
like bottled water. And how do they get away with it? Because you'll
believe anything. Even that bottled water is purer than tap water.

"It is difficult to produce a television documentary that is both
incisive and probing when every twelve minutes one is interrupted by
twelve dancing rabbits singing about toilet paper". --Rod Serling, famed
TV writer

"Get off this estate".
"What for?"
"Because it's mine".
"Where did you get it?"
"From my father".
"Where did he get it?"
"From his father".
"And where did he get it?"
"He fought for it".
"Well, I'll fight you for it".
--Carl Sandburg

Can it be imagined that an American president would openly implore
America's young people to fight a foreign war to defend "capitalism"?
The word itself has largely gone out of fashion.  The approved reference
now is to the market economy, free market, free enterprise, or private
enterprise. This change in terminology endeavors to obscure the role of
wealth in the economic and social system. Simply naming the system,
after all, might imply that there are others. And avoiding the word
"capitalism" sheds the adverse connotation going back to Karl Marx.

At some unrecorded moment a few years ago, the egg companies of America
changed their package labels from small, medium and large to medium,
large and jumbo. The eggs remained the same size.

"The Federal Trade Commission concluded that there is very little
connection between what drug companies charge for a drug and the costs
directly associated with it". {11}

"The makers of aspirin wish you had a headache right now", says the
graffiti.

Slavery is the legal fiction that a person is property and corporate
personhood is the legal fiction that property is a person.

"The private-benefit corporation is an institution granted a legally
protected right - some would claim obligation - to pursue a narrow
private interest without regard to broader social and environmental
consequences. If it were a real person, it would fit the clinical
profile of a sociopath". -- David Korten

Ralph Nader once charged the Justice Department anti-trust division with
going out of business without telling anyone.

Capitalism as practiced in the United States is like chemotherapy: it
may kill the cancer cells of consumer shortages, but the side effects
are devastating.

Many workers are paid a wage sufficient to allow them to keep on living,
even if it's not a living wage. Here's a radical solution to poverty -
pay people enough to live on.

"The paradox is that, three centuries after America's colonial
beginnings, wealth and income are more unequally distributed in the 'New
World' than in most of the nations of Europe". {12}

How many Americans realize that they have a much longer work week, much
shorter vacations, much shorter unemployment coverage, much worse
maternity leave and other employee benefits, and much worse medical
coverage than their West European counterparts?

Expressing elementary truths about the oppression of the poor by the
rich in the United States runs the risk of being accused of "advocating
class warfare"; because the trick of class war is to not let the victims
know the war is being waged.

What do the CEOs do all day that they should earn a thousand times more
than schoolteachers, nurses, firefighters, street cleaners, and social
workers? Re-read some medieval history, about feudal lords and serfs.

The campaigns of the anti-regulationists imply that pure food and drugs
will be ours as soon as we abolish the pure food and drug laws.

"American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, US Airways and Continental Airlines
raised round trip fares $10 on most domestic flights to take advantage
of strong demand" {13} - a news item from late 2006; similar items can
be found before and since. Is that not odd? Raising prices because of
strong demand? Raising prices even though they're already making more
money as a result of the increased demand? So the more someone wants
something, or the more they need it, the more they have to pay. Yes,
it's the good ol' law of supply and demand. Economics 101. You have a
problem with that? You should. What takes place in the world of
economics is sixty percent power/politics/ideology, thirty percent
psychological, ten percent immutable laws. (These percentages are
immutable.)

The more you care about others, the more you're at a disadvantage
competing in the capitalist system.

To say that one percent of the population owns 35% of the resources and
wealth, is deceptive. If you own 35% you can control much more than that.

How could the current distribution of property and wealth have emerged
from any sort of democratic process?

The myth and mystique of "choice" persuades us to endorse the
privatization of almost every sphere of activity.

A study of 17,595 federal government jobs by the Office of Management
and Budget concluded that civil servants could do their work better and
more cheaply than private contractors nearly ninety percent of the time
in job competitions. {14}

Communist governments take over companies. Under capitalism, the
companies take over the government.

The American oligarchy has less in common with the American people than
it does with the oligarchies in Japan and France.

If you lose money gambling, you can't take a tax deduction. But you can
if you lose on the glorified slot machine known as the stock market;
your loss is thus subsidized by taxpayers.

If the system should cater to selfishness because it's "natural", why
not cater to aggression which many people claim is also natural.

Do the members of a family relate to each other on the basis of
self-interest and greed?

"The idea that egotism is the basis of the general welfare is the
principle on which competitive society has been built". --Erich Fromm,
German-American social psychologist,

Capitalism is the theory that the worst people, acting from their worst
motives, will somehow produce the most good.

"The twentieth century has been characterized by three developments of
great political importance: the growth of democracy; the growth of
corporate power; and the growth of corporate propaganda as a means of
protecting corporate power against democracy". --Alex Carey, Australian
social scientist

And this, dear friends, is the system the American Empire is determined
to impose upon the entire known world.

"The country needs to be born again, she is polluted with the lust of
power, the lust of gain".
--Margaret Fuller, literary critic, New York Tribune (July 04 1845)

"When plunder becomes a way of life for a group of men living in
society, they create for themselves, in the course of time, a legal
system that authorizes it and a moral code that glorifies it".
--Frederic Bastiat, "The Law" (1850)


An ode to five years of heartless destruction of a five thousand year
civilization

"Letters My President Is Not Sending" by Naomi Shihab Nye.

Dear Rafik, Sorry about that soccer game you won't be attending since
you now have no ...

Dear Fawziya, You know, I have a mom too so I can imagine what you ...

Dear Shadiya, Think about your father versus democracy, I'll bet you'd
pick ...

No, no, Sami, that's not true what you said at the rally that our
country hates you, we really support your move toward freedom, that's
why you no longer have a house or a family or a village.

Dear Hassan, If only you could see the bigger picture ... {15}


"Building a new world" conference

May 22-25, Radford University, Radford, Virginia, five-hour drive from
Washington, DC.
Cindy Sheehan, Kathy Kelly, Michael Parenti, David Swanson, Gareth
Porter, William Blum, Medea Benjamin, Gary Corseri, and others.
Inexpensive room and board available. Full details at:
http://www.wpaconference.org/


Notes

{1} "Foreign Relations of the United States, 1943, China", Department of
State, 1957, page 630

{2} http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article19611.htm

{3} Washington Post, March 17 2008, page 12

{4} Associated Press, March 21 2008

{5} Washington Post, March 22 and 23 2008

{6} New York Times, October 27 1983

{7} William Blum, Killing Hope (1995), chapter 45

{8} Washington Times, February 26 2008

{9} Pew Research Center for the People and the Press (Washington),
February 28 2008

{10 William Blum, Rogue State (2002), chapter one re Middle East and
Latin America

{11} Washington Post, August 03 2005, pages D1-2, column by Steven
Pearlstein

{12} Wallace Peterson, Silent Depression: The fate of the American Dream
(1994)

{13} Washington Post, November 04 2006, page D2

{14} Washington Post, May 26 2004, page A25

{15} Washington Post, March 22 2008, page 1; the poet lives in San
Antonio, Texas


William Blum is the author of:-

Killing Hope: US Military and CIA Interventions Since World War Two
(Common Courage Press, 1995)

Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower (Zed Books, 2002)

West-Bloc Dissident: A Cold War Memoir (Soft Skull Press, 2002)

Freeing the World to Death: Essays on the American Empire (Common
Courage Press, 2004)


Portions of the books can be read, and copies purchased, at
http://www.killinghope.org and previous Anti-Empire Reports can be read
at this website.

To add yourself to this mailing list simply send an email to
bblum6 at aol.com with "add" in the subject line. I'd like your name and
city in the message, but that's optional. I ask for your city only in
case I'll be speaking in your area.

Or put "remove" in the subject line to do the opposite.

Any part of this report may be disseminated without permission. I'd
appreciate it if the website were mentioned.

http://members.aol.com/bblum6/aer56.htm


TO POST A COMMENT, OR TO READ COMMENTS POSTED BY OTHERS, please click
on the word "comment" highlighted at the end of the version of this
essay posted at http://billtotten.blogspot.com/