[R-G] President Hamid Karzai moves to block Lord Paddy Ashdown as UN super-envoy in Afghanistan

[Anthony Fenton]

President Hamid Karzai moves to block Lord Paddy Ashdown as UN super- 
envoy in Afghanistan

 From The Times
January 26, 2008
Michael Evans, Defence Editor, Anthony Loyd in Kabul, David Charter  
in Davos and James Bone in New York
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/ 
article3254382.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=2015164


Lord Ashdown’s appointment as the UN special envoy in Afghanistan has  
been blocked by President Karzai after he met a series of Western  
leaders in Davos, diplomats said last night.

President Karzai objected to the former Liberal Democrat leader after  
Lord Ashdown, a former Marine who headed international efforts in  
Bosnia, insisted on far-reaching powers.

The Afghan leader made clear his intention to block Lord Ashdown at  
meetings with Condoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of State, and David  
Cameron, the Conservative Party leader, during the World Economic  
Forum in the Swiss resort, one source said.

Mr Karzai also raised his reservations about Lord Ashdown with Gordon  
Brown in another meeting yesterday, according to a Western diplomat.  
Mr Brown is understood to have told the Afghan leader that Britain  
was not trying to push Lord Ashdown on him, explaining that it was a  
United Nations appointment.

Immediately after meeting Mr Brown, Mr Karzai was “grabbed” by Ban Ki  
Moon, the UN Secretary-General, for a one-on-one discussion.

Lord Ashdown had been the top candidate to become a so-called  
“superenvoy” to serve as overall co-ordinator of international aid  
and political efforts in Afghanistan, where Nato troops are battling  
a Taleban insurgency. But one well-placed diplomat said last night  
that, in light of Mr Karzai’s opposition, Mr Ashdown’s candidacy was  
now “toast”. Lord Ashdown refused to confirm that he was out of the  
running. “I’ve made no comment on this, and am not going to start  
now,” he told The Times last night.

Other possible candidates include the British General John McColl,  
the Nato Deputy Supreme Allied Commander Europe, who served as the  
first commander of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF)  
in Afghanistan in 2002 and later acted as Prime Minister Tony Blair’s  
special envoy to the country.

The UN, however, will find it difficult to accept a serving general  
as its top civilian representative in Afghanistan. Russia is said to  
be pushing for a Turkish official.

The latest snub came as British officials were already fuming over Mr  
Karzai’s criticism of the role of British troops in Afghanistan. In  
an outburst to journalists on Thursday, the Afghan leader claimed  
that British forces had failed in their mission in Helmand province.

“Without British troops in Helmand province there would be no control  
over the influence of the Taleban in the south, and no control over  
the Taleban’s exploitation of the poppy,” said one senior army  
officer who has served in Helmand.

Patrick Mercer, Conservative MP for Newark and former commanding  
officer of the Worcestershire and Sherwood Foresters Regiment, which  
has served recently in Helmand, told The Times: “On behalf of the  
nine dead friends from my former battalion, killed in Helmand, I  
resent what President Karzai said.”

The Afghan leader claimed that Helmand had been under Kabul’s control  
before the British troops arrived on the scene, and that the province  
was now overrun with Taleban.

However, Mr Mercer said: “Karzai’s writ did not run at all in Helmand  
province until the British troops arrived. Our Armed Forces have shed  
blood and died while facing up to his enemies.”

A total of 87 British troops have died in Afghanistan since 2001 — 61  
of them killed in action — and Britain has spent £1.6 billion on its  
military campaign there.

Asked if he would accept that the British presence allowed the  
Taleban back in, the Prime Minister’s spokesman replied: “Of course  
we wouldn’t accept that.” He said: “We are working alongside the  
Afghan Government in order to drive out the Taleban from Helmand. Our  
strength in Afghanistan has been to work with the Afghan Government  
and to extend the authority of the Afghan Government throughout the  
province to allow economic and political development. It is to that  
aim that our Armed Forces have suffered losses and shown great  
bravery and determination.”

The new tension has been caused by differences between the Kabul  
Government and the British troops on the ground over Mr Karzai’s  
choice of local officials to run the Helmand administration and the  
security forces.

President Karzai expressed particular frustration at the way he  
claimed the British had forced him to get rid of Sher Muhammad  
Akhunzada, his chosen and trusted governor in Helmand.

His deployment is yet another signal of Mr Karzai’s lack of faith in  
British policy in southern Afghanistan and his belief that warlords  
can succeed where governance fails.

The senior army officer said: “The trouble is, we’re looking at  
governance with Western eyes and President Karzai is looking at it  
with Afghan eyes, so perhaps in his view everything was fine before  
the British troops were sent to Helmand. I don’t know why Karzai has  
made these comments. It’s probably for his own political reasons, but  
he knows that Britain is committed to Afghanistan for the long term.”

Counting the cost

7,800 British troops deployed in Afghanistan

£738m spent by British Armed Forces in Afghanistan 2006-07

18% of British people surveyed last year thought Britain was winning  
the war

90% of heroin sold in Britain comes from Afghanistan

Sources: Times archives