[R-G] Bush in Arabia: Work in Progress or Waste of Time?
Yoshie Furuhashi
critical.montages at gmail.com
Fri Jan 18 16:13:21 MST 2008
Bush's Persian Gulf tour fails to impress even the decidedly
anti-Iranian Washington Institute for Near East Policy. -- Yoshie
<http://www.washingtoninstitute.org/templateC05.php?CID=2705>
PolicyWatch #1329
Bush in Arabia: Work in Progress or Waste of Time?
By Simon Henderson
January 17, 2008
Most of President Bush's eight-day trip to the Middle East was spent
in the Persian Gulf, visiting Kuwait, Bahrain, the two leading
sheikhdoms of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Abu Dhabi and Dubai, and
Saudi Arabia. As long-term allies of the United States, these Gulf
Arab states still look to Washington as their ultimate security
guarantor in what remains a dangerous region. In return for security,
the United States asks for a reasonable world price for oil, support
for its efforts to secure peace between Israelis and Palestinians, and
cooperation in countering the threat of a potentially nuclear-armed
Iran. The success of the trip may be judged by future progress on
these policies.
Theme of Freedom
In his January 13 keynote address in Abu Dhabi -- his only formal
speech during the trip -- the president discussed the importance of
freedom in the Middle East. He argued that the advance of freedom was
also the advance of justice, and, in a free and just society, leaders
are accountable to those they govern. Apparently deemphasizing the
word "democracy," which appeared only later in the speech, the
president said that in such a society, individuals are treated with
respect and dignity and can rise as far as their talents and hard work
will take them.
Such language becomes somewhat ironic when one considers that Saudi
Arabia, Kuwait, Bahrain, and the UAE are all hereditary kingdoms or
sheikhdoms (as are Qatar and Oman, the two members of the Gulf
Cooperation Council Bush did not visit). Accountability of leaders is
at best weak in Western terms. Talented and hard-working individuals
can rise but will never reach the top -- a place dominated by arguably
less talented and hard-working members of the royal or ruling
families.
President Bush's real targets were Iran and al-Qaeda. Speaking of
extremists who foment instability and threaten the people's
aspirations, he pinpointed "the regime that sits in Tehran" as being
"the world's leading sponsor of terrorism, . . . defy[ing] the UN and
destabilizing the region by refusing to be open and transparent about
its nuclear programs and ambitions." He also warned of the "dark rule
across the Middle East" that al-Qaeda seeks to impose.
The reported public reaction to his speech indicates that both the
leaders and the people of the Gulf states were less than persuaded.
Although the president received warm and polite welcomes (as Gulf Arab
culture demands), the last several years of criticism aimed at the
United States in general, and President Bush in particular, have
clearly taken their toll. The Gulf states are reportedly concerned
about the chaos in Iraq, what they see as a continuing U.S. bias in
favor of Israel, and whether isolation is the best way to deal with
Iran. They also view Bush, with just a year to go in the White House,
as a lame duck president.
Touring the Issues
Apart from Saudi Arabia, all of the countries President Bush visited
in the Gulf, as well as Qatar and Oman, generously allow the United
States to use their military bases for operations. The provision of
base facilities is partly a self-interested warning signal to Iran,
but the United States also uses them for critical air operations over
Iraq and Afghanistan.
Kuwait is still thankful for the U.S.-led expulsion of Iraqi invaders
in 1991 and plays host to a large rotating American force that
transits in and out of Iraq. But there are limits to this gratitude:
Kuwait declined an invitation to attend the December 2007 Annapolis
summit on Israeli-Palestinian peace. The Kuwaiti media reported that
Emir Sabah al-Ahmed al-Sabah was worried about the potential U.S. use
of force against Iran -- the emirate is only about ten miles from
Iranian territory.
Bahrain welcomed President Bush with an announcement that its airline,
Gulf Air, was buying $6 billion worth of commercial U.S. aircraft. The
island is the headquarters for the U.S. Fifth Fleet, the ships that
safeguard the entire region's oil and gas exports. Coincidentally, the
significance of this role was emphasized by the tense January 6
encounter in the Strait of Hormuz between three U.S. Navy ships and
Iranian speedboats. But King Hamad is a Sunni ruling over a 65 percent
Shiite population, co-religionists of Iran, which once had a
territorial claim to the island. And just days before Bush's arrival,
there were Shiite riots protesting the death of an antigovernment
demonstrator.
The UAE has a simmering territorial dispute with Iran, which refuses
to give up three islands it seized in the 1970s. Like the other
countries Bush visited, the UAE is perplexed about the recent U.S.
National Intelligence Estimate on Iran, which asserted that Tehran's
work on developing nuclear weapons had stopped. Bush's speech in Abu
Dhabi received polite but brief applause. The lead emirate, with 8
percent of global oil reserves (and the world's most expensive hotel,
where the president stayed), Abu Dhabi discreetly provides an airbase
used by U.S. reconnaissance and tanker aircraft. Yet, two days after
Bush's visit, during a visit by French president Nicolas Sarkozy, the
emirate openly announced an arrangement to host a French military
base. The neighboring emirate of Dubai allows American warships to
visit but owes much of its prosperity to commercial links with Iran,
which is just a short trip across the Gulf.
Saudi Arabia was probably the country most anxious for President Bush
to become involved in encouraging an Israeli-Palestinian peace treaty.
It regards the current lack of progress on the issue as a threat to
its leadership of the Arab and Muslim worlds. But the kingdom is
refusing any direct gesture toward Israel until it withdraws from all
territories occupied in 1967, and a Saudi delegation attended the
Annapolis summit only after being given diplomatic cover by an Arab
League resolution.
On Iran, the kingdom is choosing to engage rather than isolate. Last
month, King Abdullah welcomed President Mahmoud Ahmadinezhad on a
pilgrimage to Mecca. And this month, Saudi foreign minister Prince
Saud al-Faisal told his French counterpart that Washington's
confrontational behavior toward Iran was not the answer; if the Gulf
Arabs have a problem with Iran, he argued, they should talk to Tehran,
as neighbors should. Indeed, when Sarkozy departed only hours before
Bush arrived, the flag poles on the drive from the airport were flying
both the French and U.S. flags -- an apparent diplomatic signal that
the United States is not the kingdom's only ally.
A more obvious rebuff to the United States was the quick Saudi
response to President Bush's request for a boost in oil production.
Saudi oil minister Ali al-Naimi quickly announced the kingdom would
raise production only when the market justified it. The days when the
kingdom would describe its oil policy as "reliable supplies at
reasonable prices" seem to be over.
Judging the Trip
The tourist aspects of President Bush's journey -- sword dances,
displays by thoroughbred horses, and hooded hunting falcons -- sit
oddly beside the weighty concerns of Israeli-Palestinian peace and the
threat of a nuclear Iran (unless the moments of relaxed informality
reflect a personal engagement that can be turned to later diplomatic
advantage). Once recovered from the long flight home, President Bush
and his advisors must decide how to reduce any impact of the reported
adverse comments and gestures coming from Gulf Arabs regarding his
policy toward Iran. The promise of $20 billion worth of new arms,
announced this week, may not produce much leverage.
The president has said he will push forward with the peace process,
and that he will return to Israel this summer for its sixtieth
anniversary celebration. The latter move will likely reinforce Gulf
Arab perceptions of bias, potentially jeopardizing his efforts to
obtain their diplomatic and financial help in backing Palestinian
prime minister Mahmoud Abbas and isolating Hamas.
Simon Henderson is the Baker fellow and director of the Gulf and
Energy Policy Program at The Washington Institute.
--
Yoshie
<http://montages.blogspot.com/>
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list