[R-G] [BillTottenWeblog] War of the $100 laptops
Bill Totten
shimogamo at attglobal.net
Thu Feb 7 03:31:49 MST 2008
Observations on the digital divide
by Salil Tripathi
New Statesman (January 17 2008)
Three years ago at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Nicholas
Negroponte, co-founder of the media laboratory at the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology, unveiled an inspiring vision. Give a laptop to
every child in the world, and remove barriers to learning. Such a laptop
would be sturdy, require little power and cost no more than $100. In
three years, 150 million children in poor countries around the world
would be able to leapfrog over other infrastructural barriers, he said,
bridging the digital divide.
That laptop is out there. It is a sturdy little machine. It can take
knocks, works on a solar panel, doesn't succumb to rain, heat or dust,
and its screen is visible even in harsh sunlight. It connects to the
internet using wireless technology.
Kofi Annan loved it; Google, News Corp and chip manufacturer AMD backed
it. Negroponte travelled around the world telling ministries how to make
computing available to children at low cost. One Laptop Per Child
enthusiasts talked of orders in their millions.
But today, the OLPC project is badly off-target. The laptop costs $188
and much of its first production run of 300,000 went to US citizens in a
"give one, get one" scheme, rooted in charity, not business. Most
difficult for Negroponte is that he now has serious rivals.
In part, this is a measure of his success. Negroponte's evangelism has
helped to create a market that did not exist in 2005. He should feel
proud; instead, he is sore.
He blames Intel. The chip-making company initially criticised the
project, then joined the board, before leaving it in a public spat
earlier this month. Negroponte wanted Intel to stop marketing its rival
laptop, Classmate, selling for $300. Intel lined up manufacturers and
suppliers and, more importantly, committed clients.
Intel is ruthlessly competitive. A book by its former chairman, Andrew
Grove, was titled Only the Paranoid Survive. Intel decided to take on
OLPC when Negroponte's firm opted to build its laptop using the
open-source operating system, Linux, powered by chips from AMD, a rival
of Intel, thus breaking the WinTel duopoly (Windows operating system and
Intel chips). That would have longer-term impact on that duopoly in
underserved markets.
Intel, with Windows support, responded with Classmate, which sells at
$300 in some markets. Nigeria and Libya, on whom Negroponte counted,
defected to Classmate. OLPC doesn't have the resources to compete, nor
can it slash prices because it does not yet benefit from economies of scale.
But there are other issues, including appropriateness and viability.
Microsoft champions mass computing in poor countries, but believes the
right tool is the cell phone, not the PC, which requires maintenance and
support where there are few engineers and poor electricity. Dell
questions the cost structure, saying selling a viable, robust laptop
with relevant technologies at $100 is impossible.
It is hard not to sympathise with Negroponte, but capitalism works like
that. Smart companies know there are fortunes to be made, even in the
poorest countries. They are stripping costs, making their products and
services affordable to previously neglected markets. The driver is
profit, not altruism.
The result is improved lives for the poor: in Mexico, Cemex has enabled
poor consumers to build better homes; western banks have begun offering
Grameen-type microfinance; in India, the Tata group has launched a GBP
1,200 car.
In a sense, Negroponte has won. Companies are vying to achieve what was
considered impossible - making computing accessible to the poor. It
didn't work out the way he had planned but the poor are being respected
as consumers, not recipients of charity.
Who could object to that?
http://www.newstatesman.com/200801170020
TO POST A COMMENT, OR TO READ COMMENTS POSTED BY OTHERS, please click
on the word "comment" highlighted at the end of the version of this
essay posted at http://billtotten.blogspot.com/
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list