[R-G] NDP will not oppose Afghan war while in coalition

[Aaron Aarons]

In the tradition of imperialist-country social-democrats, defense of the national capitalist economy, that provides (or at least has been providing) substaintial crumbs of imperialist super-profits to their country's large labor aristocracy, takes precedence for these NDP leaders over any other principles.

But maybe I should amend that to say that the attainment of positions in government for these leaders is a second principle that takes precedence over all the others, the lives of Afghans and the survival of the biosphere be damned.

 - Aaron

P.S. I'm Bcc'ing this to a  few members of Louis Proyect's "Marxism" mailing list, from which I was recently unceremoniously banned. Anybody who is curious about the list or about why somebody was banned can go to the archives at <http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/2008w48/date.htm> and look at my posts from Nov. 3 and before, and at Louis Proyect's ukase at <http://archives.econ.utah.edu/archives/marxism/2008w48/msg00138.htm>.
 
    *          *          *          *          *          *          *

From: Anthony Fenton <fentona at shaw.ca>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:13:02 -0800
Reply-To: "Radical anti-capitalist environmental discussion."
	<rad-green at lists.econ.utah.edu>

NDP will not oppose Afghan war while in coalition
By Murray Brewster, THE CANADIAN PRESS
Wednesday, December 3, 2008

NDP will not oppose Afghan war while in coalition By Murray Brewster, THE CANADIAN PRESS Wednesday, December 3, 2008 

OTTAWA - New Democrats will stop opposing Canada's war in Afghanistan while the party is in league with the Liberals, the NDP's deputy leader declared Wednesday. 

It's a significant concession for a party that has been the standard- bearer for the peace movement in Canada. 

"The NDP is putting aside its differences that have existed historically with the Liberals on such issues as Afghanistan," said Thomas Mulcair, the party's only MP in Quebec. 

"Because we understand, in the interest of the Canadian population, the overarching principle is that we act on the economy and in the interest of Canadian families." 

In order to seal its coalition with the Liberals on Monday, NDP Leader Jack Layton gave up the party's demand for a reversal of planned corporate tax cuts, but made no mention of the war. 

Asked this week whether their position on Afghanistan had changed, several New Democrat MPs laughed nervously and ducked the question. 

Political observers have said the fourth-place party, long-known as the conscience of Parliament, has to make key compromises to keep the coalition together. 

Mulcair declined to respond when asked whether the party's election campaign promise to impose a moratorium on further oil sands development in Alberta was also being shelved. 

Liberal finance critic Scott Brison said the gravity of the economic crisis and the unravelling political situation has had a sobering effect on both coalition partners, as well as the Bloc Quebecois. 

"All three parties recognize the seriousness and as such we are putting aside our differences to focus on common ground," he said Wednesday. 

As his leadership was up for a vote at the NDP's 2006 convention in Quebec City, Layton pushed through a motion calling for the withdrawal of Canadian troops from Afghanistan. 

He soon became a target for the Conservatives in the House of Commons, who nicknamed him "Taliban Jack," ridiculing his call for peace negotiations with militants. 

Over the years, Layton has said Canada's role should be focused on traditional peacekeeping and reconstruction rather than front-line combat. 

The NDP's demand for an immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan was greeted with some sympathy by factions of the Liberal party, including at the time its newly minted leader Stephane Dion. 

Ending Canada's combat mission by February 2009, as originally intended, became Dion's middle-ground position - one that he eventually abandoned when the Liberals supported Prime Minister Stephen Harper's extension of the mission until 2011. 

Steve Staples, of the Rideau Institute, said the policy shift wasn't unexpected. 

"I suspect with the NDP helping make the decisions there will be more of an emphasis on diplomacy and efforts to end the war," said Staples, executive director of the left-leaning think-tank. 

The Conference of Defence Associations, a pro-military organization that's often been at loggerheads with the NDP, welcomed the reversal but wondered whether it was political opportunism rather than a genuine conversion. 

"It's difficult to understand that the NDP would all of sudden completely change its policy on our presence in Afghanistan," said the association's executive director Alain Pellerin.