[R-G] Foreign oil producers have U.S. over barrel
Anthony Fenton
fentona at shaw.ca
Sun Aug 24 12:26:53 MDT 2008
Foreign oil producers have U.S. over barrel
http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20080824-9999-1n24oil.html
38 percent of gas cost tied to overseas supply
By Dean Calbreath
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER
August 24, 2008
* California getting less of its oil from domestic sources
Every time you fill your gas tank, you're participating in what Texas
oilman T. Boone Pickens describes as “the largest transfer of wealth
in the history of mankind.”
On average nationwide, roughly 38 percent of the cost of gasoline is
tied to foreign-produced petroleum. Every time Americans spend $50 at
the pump, they're sending about $19 abroad.
From January through June, the United States spent $172 billion on
crude-oil imports, compared with $103 billion in the first half of
2007. Many economists describe that money as a “foreign tax” on the
U.S. economy, because much of it goes directly into state-owned oil
monopolies or government coffers.
[Photo: Dubai may be the most visible sign of the effect of
petrodollars in the Middle East. Although Dubai has relatively little
oil of its own, Saudi and Russian investments have given it a striking
skyline.]
“A $10 increase in the price of a barrel of oil is the equivalent of a
$42 billion tax on the economy,” said Peter Morici, an economist at
the University of Maryland. “Many of the richest oil-producing
countries don't spend that money, but keep it instead. That means it
doesn't come back to us to purchase our goods and services.”
Morici said that if the oil money that was sent abroad remained in the
United States, it could generate hundreds of thousands of jobs and
bolster the gross domestic product – perhaps by enough to keep the
economy from running into recession.
Pickens, who has made billions of dollars over the past 50 years
selling oil, also promotes the economic benefits of weaning the United
States from foreign imports, arguing that the drive for domestic
energy sources, including wind and solar, would put more Americans to
work.
[Graphic: United States foreign oil sources]
In a visit to Capitol Hill last month, Pickens got a favorable hearing
from politicians who complained that much of the money the United
States spends on energy ends up in unfriendly hands.
“Our growing dependence on foreign oil is a threat to our national and
economic security,” said Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine. “We are
impoverishing ourselves while enriching regimes that are in many cases
hostile to America.”
U.S. oil purchases arguably have given Venezuelan President Hugo
Chávez a greater political platform for his long-running war of words
with the White House. Oil revenue also has helped Libyan leader
Moammar Gadhafi remain in power for nearly 40 years. And, according to
many pundits, the Kremlin's concerns over its oil pipelines may have
been behind Russia's recent incursion into Georgia.
[Pie Graph: Where the Gas Money Goes]
But much of the oil coming to the United States is from places other
than the Middle East, North Africa and Russia.
Canada, which accounted for 19 percent of U.S. oil imports during the
first six months of this year, ranks as the nation's No. 1 foreign
supplier of crude oil. Until last summer, Mexico, which supplies 10
percent of U.S. imports, ranked No. 2. It has now been edged aside by
Saudi Arabia, which provides 12 percent.
Those three nations, together with Venezuela, Nigeria and Iraq, supply
75 percent of U.S. oil imports. Angola, Brazil, Algeria, Kuwait,
Ecuador and Colombia, Russia, Chad and Libya – in that order – round
out the top dozen suppliers.
Once the United States buys oil from those countries, the money is
used in a variety of ways.
In Canada, more than half the money goes to the federal and provincial
governments through royalties, taxes and fees.
Last year, Alberta, which produces 80 percent of the oil Canada
exports to the United States, collected $11 billion in oil royalties.
Most of the money goes into a trust fund that supports road
construction, schools and hospitals as well as investments for future
generations.
Besides paying 29 percent federal and provincial corporate income
taxes on their profits, Alberta's oil companies paid $40 million in
pollution fees that fund green technology initiatives.
“If we can develop technologies to solve the problem here, there will
be a great market beyond our borders,” said Greg Stringham, vice
president for fiscal policy at the Canadian Association of Petroleum
Producers.
In Saudi Arabia, some oil profits end up in the Swiss bank accounts of
the nation's ruling families. But a large portion is invested
throughout the Arab world, building schools in rural Jordan and
skyscrapers in the financial centers of Dubai and Abu Dhabi.
Dubai may be the most visible sign of the effect of petrodollars in
the Middle East. Although Dubai has relatively little oil of its own,
Saudi and Russian investments have given it a skyline that dwarfs
Manhattan's, as well as an array of man-made islands designed to be a
playground for the rich.
“Dubai rivals Hong Kong and Singapore as a global financial center,”
said Luigi Falconi, a former oil executive whose recent novel, “The
Duke of Dubai,” is partly based on his experiences there.
Similar developments are happening on a lesser scale throughout the
region.
“The oil centers in Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Bahrain have been
investing in economic growth in places without much oil, such as
Egypt, Morocco and Jordan,” said Parag Khanna, director of the global
governance initiative at the New America Foundation.
But the investments have done little to stir widespread economic
growth. Across the region, the jobless rate for young workers tops 25
percent – twice the global average.
In a number of other relatively poor oil-producing countries, the
profits from oil are used to subsidize domestic gasoline.
When gasoline was selling for more than $4.60 a gallon in San Diego in
June, for instance, it was selling for $2.75 in Tijuana, thanks to
government-mandated subsidies from Mexico's state-owned oil monopoly,
Pemex. Gasoline subsidies total $20 billion a year, prompting some
Mexican legislators to push for higher gas prices so they can use the
oil profits to fund better social services.
In oil-rich Venezuela, the biggest oil center in the Western
Hemisphere, gasoline costs 11 cents per gallon, and there's still
enough money left over to provide the poor with free health care and
subsidized groceries.
Not all the oil money stays overseas. Much of it comes back to the
United States in the form of investments.
Between 2004 and 2006, oil-producing nations invested an average of
$100 billion a year in Treasury bonds and other U.S. securities,
according to a recent study by Bank of America. Those investments,
combined with non-oil investments from China and Japan, helped fund
such big-ticket items as the Iraq war and the U.S. mortgage boom.
More recently, as the U.S. economy has veered toward recession, the
pace of investment has slowed. In 2007, for example, the oil-producing
countries had a net investment of more than $80 billion in U.S.
securities, a 20 percent drop from the previous year. Even so, the
investments accounted for 7 percent of total U.S. capital inflows.
“A lot of the petrodollars get recycled,” said Dan Seiver, a finance
professor at San Diego State University. “The central banks overseas
that accumulate petrodollars end up buying our Treasury and
(government-sponsored entities, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac)
paper. If they didn't do that, our interest rates would be a lot
higher.”
But Morici said that with all the foreign investments in U.S.
securities, the United States has “lost control of the money supply,”
resulting in rising inflation.
Besides snapping up U.S. securities, sovereign wealth funds – or
government-backed investment funds – from such countries as Kuwait,
Abu Dhabi, Saudi Arabia and Russia have invested heavily in U.S.
financial institutions such as Merrill Lynch and Citigroup.
Sometimes, the investments go too far for U.S. sensibilities.
In 2006, when the port of Dubai bought a British shipping company that
manages six U.S. ports in 2006, it touched off a firestorm on Capitol
Hill.
“Dubai cannot be trusted,” said Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Alpine, warning
that it and the other emirates on the Persian Gulf had close ties to
terrorism. Many experts on the region disagreed, saying that Dubai was
one of the bulwarks against terrorism in the region.
To avoid controversy, Dubai subsequently spun off the U.S. port
operations. But some analysts say the criticism cost the United States
a huge aircraft deal a year later, when Dubai chose to buy planes from
Europe's Airbus instead of Boeing.
“We say we want the petrodollars to come back to the U.S., and then we
kick the Arabs in the butt when they try to buy something,” Falconi
said.
Joseph Quinlan, chief market strategist for Bank of America, said the
reinvestment of petrodollars – including the investments in U.S.
securities – provides a needed influx of money into the U.S. economy.
“The debt-stretched United States needs to attract more than $2
billion a day to cover its savings gap,” Quinlan said. “Against this
backdrop, every dollar counts.”
Dean Calbreath: (619) 293-1891; dean.calbreath at uniontrib.com
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list