[R-G] compare engdahl on plate tectonics to this
Gregory Meyerson
gmeyerson at triad.rr.com
Wed Sep 26 10:09:26 MDT 2007
engdahl suggests that russian geologists who support the abiotic
theory are applying wegener's plate tectonics theory to the discovery
of oil. engdahl uses this piece of information to suggest that what
the russian scientists are doing is sound. endahl also notes that
u.s. scientists viewed wegener as a lunatic, the implication being
that just as wegener was correct, so the russian geologists will be
proven correct.
note below (from the heinberg article I url'd for you) how wegener is
used to bolster the biotic origins case. the relation between theory
and evidence is complex.
The claims for the abiotic theory often seem overstated in other
ways. J. F. Kenney of Gas Resources Corporations, Houston, Texas, who
is one of the very few Western geologists to argue for the abiotic
theory, writes, "competent physicists, chemists, chemical engineers
and men knowledgeable of thermodynamics have known that natural
petroleum does not evolve from biological materials since the last
quarter of the 19th century."(12) Reading this sentence, one might
assume that only a few isolated troglodyte pseudoscientists would
still be living under the outworn and discredited misconception that
oil can be formed from biological materials. However, in fact
universities and oil companies are staffed with thousands of
"competent physicists, chemists, chemical engineers and men [and
women!] knowledgeable of thermodynamics" who not only subscribe to
the biogenic theory, but use it every day as the basis for successful
oil exploration. And laboratory experiments have shown repeatedly
that petroleum is in fact produced from organic matter under the
conditions to which it is assumed to have been subjected over
geological time. The situation is actually the reverse of the one
Kenny implies: most geologists assume that the Russian abiotic oil
hypothesis, which dates to the era prior to the advent of modern
plate tectonics theory, is an anachronism. Tectonic movements are now
known to be able to radically reshuffle rock strata, leaving younger
sedimentary oil- or gas-bearing rock beneath basement rock, leading
in some cases to the appearance that oil has its source in
Precambrian crystalline basement, when this is not actually the case.
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list