[R-G] Paying an Author and Putting Her Down
Anthony Fenton
fentona at shaw.ca
Tue Sep 25 17:10:11 MDT 2007
Copyright 2007 The New York Times Company
The New York Times
September 24, 2007 Monday
Late Edition - Final
SECTION: Section C; Column 0; Business/Financial Desk; Pg. 4
LENGTH: 373 words
HEADLINE: Paying an Author and Putting Her Down
BYLINE: By IAN AUSTEN
BODY:
The National Post, a newspaper in Toronto founded by Conrad M. Black,
is no political ally of Naomi Klein, a Canadian who is the author of
''No Logo'' and a critic of corporate influence. So it is not
surprising that The Post devoted four columns recently to criticism
of Ms. Klein's new book, ''The Shock Doctrine'' (Metropolitan Books).
Terence Corcoran, a business columnist, began his critique: ''Just
four pages into 'The Shock Doctrine' and already the wheels are
flying off Naomi Klein's big new ideological busload of leftist
fantasy.''
What is unusual is that the paper bought excerpts from the book to
accompany each critical essay, in essence putting money in Ms.
Klein's pocket for the privilege of knocking her down.
Jonathan Kay, the newspaper's managing editor for comment, who also
contributed one of the accompanying columns, said Ms. Klein's
influence in Canada justified reprinting her work. But, he added, her
popularity also requires the inclusion of alternative views.
''She is the most successful author since Noam Chomsky popularizing
leftist ideas in the post-Marxist age,'' Mr. Kay said. ''In this
case, running 4,000 or 5,000 words making a single thesis amounted to
making a powerful editorial endorsement, some readers might say.''
Louise Dennys, Ms. Klein's publisher at Knopf Canada, said The Post
had not advised her about its plans when it bought the reprint rights
for an amount she declined to disclose. But, Ms. Dennys said, ''We
were really pleased with it. Part of Naomi's reason for writing the
book is to instigate thought and debate.'' (Ms. Klein was traveling
and could not be reached for comment.)
''The Shock Doctrine'' was not the first book to be simultaneously
excerpted and criticized by The Post. Parts of ''God Is Not Great''
by Christopher Hitchens received similar treatment over most of a
week. (''I wanted to make sure we insulted every religion,'' Mr. Kay
said.)
The two series of excerpts and rebuttals give some indication about
whether readers of The Post feel more strongly about religion or
politics. While Ms. Klein's work provoked a significant number of e-
mails and letters, Mr. Kay said, the reaction still lags behind that
brought about by Mr. Hitchens.
IAN AUSTEN
URL: http://www.nytimes.com
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list