[R-G] "Ghosts” – A Cheap Shot at the People’s Struggle in Haiti
Anthony Fenton
fentona at shaw.ca
Fri Jul 27 08:29:34 MDT 2007
“Ghosts” – A Cheap Shot at the People’s Struggle in Haiti
by Shirley Pate
July 26, 2007
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=55&ItemID=13380
A recently released film, "The Ghosts of Cite Soleil," tells the
story of two young men, Bily and 2pac, who live in Cite Soleil, a
poor neighborhood of Port-au-Prince.
Most people who have reviewed the film suggest that viewers are at
once titillated and repelled by these young men because of their
violence-ridden lifestyle. We learn that they are "chimeres" (a word
that loosely means "monster" and used for several years to demonize
supporters of former Haitian president, Jean-Bertrand Aristide).
It’s a label that adds a certain drama, if you are looking at it from
a cinematic standpoint, but its political implications are serious.
Several years ago, a mainstream journalist introduced “chimere”
broadly into the international media suggesting that President
Aristide had a corps of violence-prone monster-creatures responsible
for attacks on his political opponents. The introduction and
extensive use of “chimere” by journalists was part of an
international plot to turn world opinion against Aristide paving the
way for a coup d’etat that would oust him in 2004 and lead to the
murder of thousands of his supporters.
While “Ghosts” appears to be the belle of the blogs and various
newspapers, many of the reviews, analyses, and discussions about the
film are unenlightened by facts concerning Haiti’s history and politics.
Filmmaker, Asgor Leth, is under the mistaken impression that his
movie is a documentary. Actually, it is a staged fraud of a movie
that exploits the poverty and social circumstances of life in Cite
Soleil. Just below the film’s veneer of gangster rap, sex, and
violence lies an unmistakable and intentional subtext: supporters of
Aristide are violence-prone sub-humans who, because of their
overwhelming majority and continued demand for the return of
Aristide, must be contained and then eliminated. A lack of context
might lead viewers to assume that the “chimeres” are the primary
aggressors in Haitian society. Quite the opposite is true. Those
labeled “chimere” during and after the coup were met with certain
incarceration or execution by the Haitian National Police – many were
accused over Haitian radio. Rather than aggressors, those labeled
“chimeres” have been, and continue to be, the victims.
Not long after the UN peacekeeping mission, MINUSTAH, arrived in
Haiti, it began to raid poor, Aristide- supporting neighborhoods.
Yet, the indiscriminate attacks were causing it a public relations
problem. In need of a propaganda advantage, MINUSTAH came up with
its own term for the “resistant” population that remains loyal to
Aristide – “bandit.” This term may not be as exotic as “chimere,”
but with its roots in the 1915-1934 US occupation of Haiti, where the
mere utterance of the word provided Marines carte blanche to kill, it
resonated well and has become pervasive in the media and a major
theme in speeches by the UN Secretary General’s representative in
Haiti, Edmond Mulet.
And, this brings another political reality to the fore. MINUSTAH’s
mandate calls for bringing security to Haiti yet, security for all
Haitians is not part of its agenda. Make no mistake, MINUSTAH was
sent to Haiti by a US-dominated UN Security Council to do one thing:
make the coup of February 2004 “stick.” Elite Haitians and
international business interests are banking on an Aristide-less
Haiti. Aristide was on a path of shifting the balance of power into
the hands of the majority of Haitians who are poor by doubling the
minimum wage, dedicating 20% of the nation’s budget to education,
instituting widespread literacy programs and struggling successfully
with international financial institutions to not privatize all of
Haiti’s state-owned companies. The last thing the business class
needs in Haiti is a better-paid, better-educated workforce.
No documentary about post-coup Haiti can be authentic unless it
“outs” those responsible for the carnage, asks hard questions and
pursues answers relentlessly. “Ghosts” never tried to do any of these
things. If “Ghosts” wants to collect its “documentary” credentials,
it will have to admit that Bily and 2pac are not the real bad guys
but, rather: the US, France, and Canada who planned, financed and
implemented the coup that ousted President Aristide; the US-installed
de facto government of Gerard Latortue that maintained an
extraordinary atmosphere of impunity making summary incarcerations
and executions of Aristide supporters effortless and without
consequence; and the US-dominated United Nations Security Council and
its peacekeeping mission in Haiti, MINUSTAH, which is making the coup
“stick” by committing massacres of unarmed Haitians in poor
neighborhoods.
Asking the right questions and pursuing the answers is the only way
to honor the struggle of the people of Haiti. In addition, those
answers will tell us far more about the lives of Bily and 2pac than
“Ghosts” ever could. While there are many questions that can and
should be asked, I propose the following:
What was intended for Haiti's economy and education, health and
social structures when the US coordinated an embargo on loans to
Haiti by international financial institutions beginning in 2000 and
not ending until Aristide's forced departure four years later? Who
in the international press collaborated with the coup makers to
demonize Aristide and criminalize his supporters by labeling them
"chimeres?" How long before the coup did the US, France, and Canada
map out the plan to destabilize Haiti politically by financing
"opposition groups" and fake human rights organizations that fingered
"chimeres" for summary executions by the Haitian National Police?
How many thousands of guns did the US give to the Dominican Republic
that went to Haitian "rebels" hiding out there to invade their own
country and kill thousands of Aristide supporters and, for god’s
sake, how many of those guns are still in their hands? What kinds of
state repression tactics did the unelected Prime Minister of the
illegal interim government of Haiti employ to "contain" the
overwhelming majority of Haitians who demanded the return of their
democratically-elected president? How long before the coup did the
US-dominated UN Security Council develop its occupation plan for
Haiti involving first, soldiers from the three countries that
orchestrated the coup and then followed by a UN “peacekeeping”
occupation? Why, for the first time in UN history was MINUSTAH the
only peacekeeping mission deployed without a peace agreement to
enforce? How many Haitians died because MINUSTAH ignored the
assassination of unarmed demonstrators by Haitian National Police
sharpshooters? Why does the present government of Haiti allow
MINUSTAH to continue to label Haiti’s citizens as “bandits” for
supporting the return of Aristide and resisting a cruel occupation?
Finally, what monster, under the guise of pursuing “bandits,”
authorized UN raids into Cite Soleil and other poor neighborhoods
involving hundreds of UN soldiers, tanks, and assault helicopters
resulting in the death and injury of hundreds of unarmed Haitians?
Luckily, there is one documentary that can answer these and many
other questions about what happened in Haiti. It’s a film called
“Haiti: We Must Kill the Bandits,” by acclaimed filmmaker, Kevin
Pina. Finally, the people of Haiti have a film about their struggle
that is honest, well-researched, hard-hitting, and dead serious.
Most importantly, “Bandits” features Haitians telling their own story
about their fight for justice, peace and security. You can find more
information about the film at this website: http://
www.haitiinformationproject.net/.
Shirley Pate is a Haiti solidarity activist in Washington, D. C. You
can contact her by email at: magbana at hcvanalysis.net. For other
articles written by her, please go to: http://
hcvanalysis.wordpress.com.
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list