[R-G] Analyst urges feds to audit contractors in Afghanistan
Anthony Fenton
fentona at shaw.ca
Fri Jul 20 22:47:42 MDT 2007
Copyright 2007 Sudbury Star
All Rights Reserved
Sudbury Star (Ontario)
July 20, 2007 Friday
SECTION: GREATER SUDBURY; Pg. A3
LENGTH: 796 words
HEADLINE: Analyst urges feds to audit contractors in Afghanistan
BYLINE: Denis St. Pierre
BODY:
The Canadian government should pursue a value-for-money audit on the
hundreds of millions of dollars it is paying private military
suppliers in Afghanistan, says an academic analyst of federal defence
policies.
Given its rapidly-growing dependence on private military suppliers,
"the government of Canada should at minimum fully explore the impact
of this decision," Dalhousie University researcher David Perry says.
Perry, an assistant director of the Centre for Foreign Policy
Studies, makes the recommendation in the latest edition of the
centre's Journal of Military and Strategic Studies.
In his research paper, titled, "Contractors in Kandahar, eh? Canada's
'Real' Commitment to Afghanistan," Perry documents "the Canadian
Forces' growing utilization of private military firms on
international operations" in recent years.
"Personnel reductions in the 1990s and a persistently high
operational tempo have forced the Canadian Forces to increasingly
rely on commercial support options on operations abroad," he states.
"It is argued here that while the Canadian Forces' use of privately
provided logistics functions has remained modest to date, the
Canadian military will continue to accelerate the rate at which it
relies on non-military support options."
In particular, Perry says, "the personnel demands of the current
mission in Afghanistan will require Canada to continue, if not
increase, its reliance on private support options at ... Kandahar Air
Field."
Perry's research paper focuses primarily on Canada's Contractor
Augmentation Program, or CANCAP, through which contractors have been
paid hundreds of millions to provide support services to Canadian
troops in Afghanistan.
The research notes how Canada employed contractors on an overseas
operation for the first time in 2000, when it awarded a $115-million
contract to a corporation to provide logistics support to
peacekeeping troops in Bosnia Herzegovina.
The government resorted to a private contractor due to "significant
shortages of (Canadian Forces) support personnel, specifically their
inability to support the ... mission, while simultaneously retaining
sufficient capacity to staff other potential operations," Perry states.
In late 2002, the government launched a similar initiative - the
CANCAP program - by awarding a five-year, $200-million contract to
SNC Lavalin PAE Government Services, a joint venture between Quebec
based SNC Lavalin and California-based Pacific Architects and
Engineers. SNC Lavalin PAE would provide myriad support services to
Canadian troops, including administration, communication, health,
transportation, water supply, waste management and fire protection.
Although the contract's initial value was pegged at a maximum of $200
million for the five-year period ending in December 2007, by late
2003 the Department of National Defence was requesting a huge
increase in government spending, Perry documents in his research.
That led to "a $300 million increase officially announced in July
2004," he notes.
"The sums of money involved are not alarming on their own," Perry
says, until they are compared to similar spending by the American
military on its private contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan.
"From 2002 (to) 2004 the Canadian military paid a total of slightly
more than $300M for privately contracted logistics services," he
says. "The total incremental mission costs for those operations was
cumulatively about $1.34 billion, thus the Canadian military was
devoting a little over 22 per cent of the total cost of operations
abroad toward private logistics."
In contrast, Perry says, the amount of money paid by the American
government for similar purposes in Iraq and Afghanistan, from 2001 to
2006, "accounts for less than five per cent of all expenditures,"
Perry says.
Despite these facts, the Canadian government has yet to engage in a
"value- for-money" audit on private military contracts, he says.
"To date only a single internal (Department of National Defence)
investigation ... has examined this practice in detail," Perry notes.
But the review did not include a value-for-money examination, he adds.
"This audit focused on achievement of the program's goal, of which
cost savings were explicitly not included."
However, the government report did suggest further analysis of cost
issues was advisable, Perry adds.
"It is high time that (the government) fully examine the direction of
logistics support outsourcing in Canada ... if a reliance on a CANCAP
like program becomes the future model of Canadian military
operations," Perry concludes in his research paper.
A Sudburian, former city administrator Al Stephen, is headed to
Afghanistan today to take a lead role with SNC Lavalin PAE in its
provision of support services to Canadian troops.
dstpierre at thesudburystar.com
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list