[R-G] "Twenty-Five Million Iraqis Dream of Peace"
Richard Menec
menecraj at shaw.ca
Sat Dec 29 23:20:56 MST 2007
"Twenty-Five Million Iraqis Dream of Peace"
World Against War International Conference, London Dec. 1 & 2, 2007
Sponsored by Stop the War UK
On December 1, 2007, over 1,200 anti-war activists, from the UK, and from 43
different nations, participated in the World Against War conference in
London. As delegates representing US Labor Against the War, we took in the
many voices and experiences expressed. We were all united in our desire to
stop the US occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan, prevent a war in Iran, and
create a world of solidarity and peace. The conference issued a declaration
which is attached at the end of this report.
The format of the conference was mostly brief (10 minute) presentations from
the podium with some time for a few questions at the end of each of the
lengthy sessions. The goal was to hear from as many parts of the movements
from as many different nations as possible; audience participation was
clearly a lesser goal. There were 3 plenary sessions and parallel sessions
regarding Iran and Iraq and regarding Afghanistan and the movement in
Europe. There were tables with literature, books, T-shirts and buttons from
a wide range of organizations representing the struggles within the UK. We,
along with a few other international groups, shared a table where we sold
our "Meeting Face to Face" DVD and gave out lots of flyers, stickers and
buttons to spread the word about the antiwar work within the US labor
movement.
Speakers emphasized international solidarity, increasing both the level and
base of activism, and tailoring strategies to national situation and
culture. For example, the Irish comrades talked about the fact that while
their government does not send troops to Iraq, Shannon airport is used as a
major stopover for troops and ammunitions headed for Iraq and Afghanistan.
Their work centers on opposing the use of Irish soil to support the war
effort. The Czech activists told us about their efforts to prevent the US
from building bases in the Czech Republic. The Canadians and Greeks
organize around their troops in Afghanistan.
Many speakers pointed out the hypocrisy and double standard of the US call
for democracy in the Middle East while it strives for global domination and
destroys the rights and lives of the people whose countries it occupies.
The last thing the US government wants is a true democracy in Iraq. An
Iraqi people who truly govern themselves in their own interests would end
the occupation by US troops, mercenaries, and military contractors
immediately and then get on about rebuilding their country. A number of the
British speakers mentioned the massive cost of the war, addressing the shame
of the US, spending $2.5 billion for one stealth bomber while it does not
provide health care for its people.
There were representatives from Canada, Czech Republic, Denmark, France,
Germany, Greece, Egypt, Iceland, Iran, Iraq, Ireland, Italy, Kenya, Lebanon,
Netherlands, Norway, Pakistan, Palestine, Poland, Somalia, South Korea,
Spain, Switzerland, Turkey, United Kingdom, United States, as well as the
African Liberation Support Campaign. The US delegates included the two of
us from USLAW, several from groups affiliated with UFPJ, including Veterans
for Peace and Peace Action, and ANSWER. Speakers from the US were Nancy
Romer from USLAW, UFPJ co-chair George Martin, and Muna Cootbee from ANSWER.
Two important issues raised by many of the speakers were: - the importance
of mobilizing opposition to an impending attack on the 80 million people in
Iran, and - the importance of mobilizing against the siege of the population
of Gaza, the "collective punishment" cuts in electricity and water,
reductions in food and medicine convoys, all of which has been met with
silence by the international community.
We were united in our desire to create a world without war, based on
self-determination and non-domination. There was unity on the importance and
power of international solidarity and coordinated action to reach these
goals.
The Iraqis spoke of the relative lack of religious sectarian violence and
tension prior to the US invasion of Iraq. They emphasized that the US
occupiers have manipulated these sectarian divisions and dramatically
exacerbated the problems on every level. The US has funded the various
militias that create the sectarian violence. They insisted that there can
be no peace, no resolutions of differences, no possibility of democracy if
the US continues its occupation of Iraq. The US troops and bases must be
withdrawn immediately for Iraq to rebuild its government, its civil society,
and its nation. The people of Iraq are united in their opposition to the US
occupation.
There was discussion by anti-war activists indicating a contradiction
between the struggle for human rights within countries fighting against the
US occupation and support for all groups who oppose the US plans for world
domination. There is substantial disagreement as to the importance of
paying attention to the specific rights of women within Iraq, in particular,
the imposition of Sharia law on women. Some point to the attacks on women
without head covers and who wear make- up by fundamentalist elements as
proof that human rights are systematically violated and must be protected as
a new Iraqi regime comes into being. Others firmly believe that a united
front against the US occupation is the only worthy demand at this point,
fearing that attention to human rights issues can inadvertently support the
US occupation forces. This is a dilemma and we urge more clarity on these
issues.
"Meeting Face to Face", the documentary on the USLAW- sponsored Iraqi labor
union tour of the US in 2005, was shown during lunch. During the course of
the trip, 20 copies were sold.. It was well received and seen as a fine
example of labor solidarity with the Iraqi people.
On December 2, about 100 international delegates and Stop the War, UK
steering committee met to discuss strategy for the next period. Again the
format was speakers from the front but this time with much greater
participation all around. Hassan Jumaa, president of the Iraqi Oil Workers
presented a strategy based on protection of Iraqi labor rights and defeat of
the US- authored proposed Iraqi law which would privatize their oil, selling
it off to ExxonMobil, Shell, etc. He talked about the US policy being based
on being a satellite in Iraq where Iraq's economy will be looted by the
multinational corporations. The oil law is an example of the US
administration's neoliberal plan of deregulating the economy, privatizing
public resources and reducing public services. The Iraqi people would be
stripped of their most valuable natural resource. Mindy spoke about the
significance of the letters sent by AFL-CIO President John Sweeney, and USW
and CWA presidents in defense of Iraqi labor rights and against the oil law
in protecting the lives of Iraqi labor activists and leaders.
We agreed on joint actions in each of our nations during the week of March
14-22, the 5th anniversary of the war in Iraq. While we would prefer one
day of joint actions as we did on Feb. 15, 2003, the March 21 actual
anniversary date is surrounded by religious and holidays that make one
shared date difficult. The overall call will be "World Against War" with
the demands being: Stop the Occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, No War on
Iran. A website will track the plans of various countries around the world.
On Monday, December 3, Mindy and Nancy had a private meeting with Hassan
Jumaa, president of the Iraqi Oil Workers Union, and his interpreter and
activist supporter, Sabah Jawad, from the Iraqi Democrats Against the
Occupation based in London. Jumaa expressed his hope that the labor
movements, particularly from the US and UK would: Build opposition to Iraqi
laws 150 and 151 (left over from Sadam Hussein's regime and continued by the
US government), outlawing unions and strikes in the public sector which
encompasses 80% of all Iraq's workers, including those in the oil sector.
Keep the pressure on against the proposed oil privatization law and other
formats in which the US might try to gain control of the Iraqi oil industry.
Get the TUC (Trades Union CongressÃ,ÂUK labor federation) and the AFL-CIO
and Change to Win to pressure the International Labor Organization (ILO) to
intervene on behalf of the above two demands and that all these groups would
build campaigns around these two issues. Create a union-based campaign to
educate and activate our workers around these issues and, of course, to end
the US occupation of Iraq immediately. Bring US labor educators to the
Solidarity Center in Amman, Jordan to train Iraqi labor leaders on contract
negotiations, mobilization of members, labor history, and other topics, to
help prepare labor activists to take their proper role in society. Material
support for Iraqi unions but in cash not in checks. In the past, USLAW
generously gave the Iraqi unionists money which was frozen by the government
in a bank account and still is not available for use. Iraqi unions need
money to buy equipment.
After meeting with Jamaa, excited by the direct contact and deep
appreciation for USLAW that he expressed, we began our brief speaking tour
of anti-war activists in the UK. We spoke in Cambridge and Manchester where
we met with activist students and workers, eager to hear about the anti-war
movement in the US. Mindy and Nancy spoke about the general politics, the
strategy and specific tactics of our unions and USLAW in mobilizing and
educating our members against the war. Their response to us was positive
and they were relieved to know that there is anti-war movement within the US
labor movement, as well as groups mobilizing against war across the country.
In Manchester, health care workers of UNISOM (their big healthcare workers
union) were on strike in unity against the firing of a nurse who spoke out
publicly against cutbacks and privatization of publicly funded healthcare in
the UK. Some of the activists in this effort attended our session. We
learned that US and UK workers face similar struggles against privatization
of public services and the cutback of the quality and quantity of these
services. Quality, publicly funded healthcare is a major issue in both
nations.
We were put up in local people's homes during our trip and had the
opportunity to share experiences in more informal ways in both Cambridge and
Manchester.
For most people we spoke with, this was their first contact with or
knowledge of USLAW and most people had little information about any anti-war
activity in the US. Our participation as USLAW delegates contributed to the
discussion, ideas, and sense of international and especially labor
solidarity apparent throughout the conference and tour. People took our
flyers, union hats and T-shirts, stickers and buttons, along with their
growing awareness of the reality of the US people's opposition to the war.
We emphasized the importance of the labor movement within the anti-war
movement in general and the importance of the anti-war movement within the
labor movement. We further emphasized our accomplishments in educating and
mobilizing our members and in getting the AFL-CIO, for the first time in its
60 year history, to oppose a war being fought by the US government.
Throughout our trip we came in contact with opposing organizations within
the British anti-war movement. It reminded us of our own divisions. As
outsiders, we could see the destructive and often petty nature of these
divisions as they were portrayed to us. It made us appreciate the lack of
sectarianism within USLAW and our hopes for a less divided US anti-war
movement in the future.
Several curious omissions were apparent. First, there was an almost
complete lack of discussion on the importance and dynamics of race in the
international struggles. While Nancy did not raise these issues in her
talk, partly due to severe time constraints, no one else raised race issues
during the course of the program. In future presentations, we think it is
important to contextualize the war within the racist framework in which it
exists, domestically and internationally. People of color, and black people
in particular, in the US are hardest hit by the economic realities of the
war, e.g., cutback in public services, recession, attacks on unionization
and prevailing wage. As well, the clear parallel example of post-Katrina New
Orleans in terms of "shock and awe" giving way to a total reconfiguration of
society based on privatization and elimination of the poor, should be part
of every analysis and presentation USLAW offers. George Martin from UFPJ
did mention New Orleans but only in the context of government priorities.
Second, there were no delegates from Palestine which was surprising given
the importance of their struggle in the cauldron of the present Middle East.
While there was some discussion of Palestine, the absence of Palestinian
delegates made this discussion more abstract and less dynamic. We feel
these two central strands of the struggle should be included in future such
discussions. Finally, there were no delegates from Latin America, a
continent involved in perhaps the most progressive transformation on the
planet. Their absence was unfortunate.
We were honored to represent USLAW and be so warmly welcomed by our
international brothers and sisters. We were pleased that there were two of
us and wish to emphasize the importance of sending at least two people to
these sorts of events. Together we managed to talk with more people, gather
more information, and learn more. We were able to share our experiences and
craft a more accurate and complete analysis to report to our comrades in
USLAW. We send our thanks, our greetings and our hopes for a more unified
and effective international anti-war movement in the future.
Mindy Gershon, 1199 SEIU, UHWE Nancy Romer, PSC-CUNY, AFT 2334
The London World Against War conference was a great success. More than
twelve hundred people from across the planet heard speakers from 26
countries talk about the future for the world peace movement.
We would like to thank all the international delegates for participating and
making the conference work. As you know the conference issued a declaration
which amongst other things called for international co-ordination of
demonstrations on the fifth anniversary of the war in Iraq. The declaration
is below. Full video of the conference is available at
http://www.stopwar.org.uk.
On Sunday 2 December, delegates from 21 countries gathered to discuss how we
put into practice the decisions taken by the conference. It was agreed that
a website would be set up to publicise and co- ordinate the international
action, and that we would all set about collecting the names of
organisations and prominent individuals who support the idea of global
demonstrations.
A website to co-ordinate the action will go live within a week at
www.theworldagainstwar.org. The email address associated with it is
info at theworldagainstwar.org
We want maximum content on the site as soon as possible. Please e-mail us
with following information: 1) Details of the demonstration(s) in your
country, and links to your website 2) Names of organisations and prominent
individuals who support international demonstrations 3) Quotes from leading
supporters backing the idea of global action. 4) Images and video relevant
to the website
Please send your contributions in your own language and in english if
possible.
Thanks again and new years greetings, Chris Nineham Stop the War Coalition
Declaration of World Against War conference
This conference of delegates from peace, anti-war, anti-imperialist and
liberation movements across the world declares its opposition to the
'endless war' prosecuted by the US government against states, peoples and
movements in all parts of our planet.
We oppose the interference of the US and its allies in sovereign states, and
assert the right of all peoples to self-determination. We support all
people fighting for peace and against imperialism.
In particular, we demand:
- An immediate end to the illegal military occupation of Iraq, which has
caused hundreds of thousands of deaths and displaced millions of people, a
withdrawal of all foreign troops and the full transfer of sovereignty to the
Iraqi people and their representatives.
- A halt to all preparations for an attack against Iran, and a commitment to
solve any issues through exclusively diplomatic means.
- A withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan, allowing the Afghan
people to determine their own future.
- Justice for the Palestinian people, and an end to Israeli aggression
throughout the Middle East.
- An end to plans for US missile defence, and that all states actively
pursue nuclear disarmament.
We affirm the solidarity of all those fighting for peace, social justice and
self-determination worldwide, and commit ourselves to strengthening our
unity and developing new forms of co-operation.
We therefore designate the anniversary of the invasion of Iraq as a
worldwide day of action in support of the demands NO ATTACK on IRAN and
TROOPS OUT OF IRAQ/AFGHANISTAN and call on all national anti-war movements
to hold mass protests and demonstrations on that day.
==============
This email was sent to you as part of an alternative news service,
by Richard Ménec. You can 'subscribe' or 'unsubscribe' by
replying to the sender with either term in the subject field.
Feel free to tell your friends.
Our website: http://booksinternationale.pbwiki.com/
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a
prior interest in receiving the included information for research
and educational purposes.
==============
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list