[R-G] Worst Movie of the Year: Brzezinski and Charlie Wilson's War
Anthony Fenton
fentona at shaw.ca
Wed Dec 26 19:38:09 MST 2007
December 26, 2007
Worst Movie of the Year
Brzezinski and Charlie Wilson's War
By STANLEY HELLER
http://counterpunch.org/heller12262007.html
Imagine, they made a funny movie about how the US helped turn
Afghanistan into a killing field. It's the film "Charlie Wilson's
War, a ligthearted look of how a skirt-chasing Congressman and a no-
nonsense CIA thug helped bring mountains of weapons and money to the
fanatic, women-despising "freedom fighters" who gave us 9/11. It's
certainly material for a "laugh riot".
To be sure it was the Soviets who did most of the killing. From
December 27, 1979 when they overthrew the government of Afghanistan
until February of 1989 they ravaged the country. By the war's end
there were a million dead Afghans, another 3 million injured, and a
whole generation growing up to think that war and war crimes were the
natural way of life. Soviet land mines still litter the country.
Yet the evidence is that the US government wanted the Soviets to
invade and did what it could to provoke it. According to Secretary of
State Robert Gates 1997 book "From the Shadows" the CIA started
giving aid to Islamic rebels in Afghanistan six months before the
Soviets invaded. This was confirmed and detailed in an interview with
Zbignew Brzezinski, Jimmy Carter's National Security Advisor in 1998
in the French journal Le Nouvel Observateur. In the interview
Brzezinski explained that Jimmy Carter signed an order on July 3 of
1979 to give aid to the mujahadeen and that he (Brzezinski) wrote
Carter a note that same day saying "this aid was going to induce a
Soviet military intervention".
Not that Brzezinski objected. To the contrary this is how he answered
his interviewer's question on whether he had any regrets. "Regret
what? That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect
of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you want me to
regret it? The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I
wrote to President Carter. We now have the opportunity of giving to
the USSR its Vietnam War."
Afghanistan would become the next venue for Cold War game playing and
the Afghan people would be the pawns.
Charlie Wilson's role in this whole affair is vastly overstated.
After all it was Jimmy Carter who hysterically declared the invasion
"the most serious threat to peace since the Second World War." If
ever a country was remote and unimportant in world affairs it was
Afghanistan, yet earlier in 79 Carter had seen the total defeat of
his boy, the Shah of Iran, so he had to show macho in some other
theater. Hard as it may be to believe today, Carter portrayed the
Russian move into Afghanistan as the first step to Soviet dominiation
of the Persian Gulf and Americans bought it. Carter created the
climate for the massive funding of the Afghan and foreign mujahadeen.
Nor should we forget Ronald Reagan. His role can be summed up by his
colorful statement in 1985 calling the mujahadeen the "moral
equivalent" of the US founding fathers.
Yet there is no doubt Charlie Wilson's enthusiasim was important in
bringing about a flood of money and weapons. Wilson, a Democrat and a
liberal in domestic matters, was a hard core rightist in foreign
affairs. The movie tries to make us believe that seeing Afghan
refugees in Pakistan utterly changed Charlie Wilson, but he was a
fervent anti-commmunist well before that. He was a good old buddy of
Nicaraguan dictator Anastasio Samoza and fought hard to get Carter to
stop distancing himself from the Nicaraguan tyrant. The movie
gleefully shows Wilson calling in favors on the House Intelligence
and Defense Appropriations Committees and gathering half a billion
dollars in weapons for the fundamentalists. The guns and money first
flowed through Pakistan giving the US a way to deny involvement and
gaining the dictatorship's ISI intelligence agency a chance to wet
its beak.
The movie makes mention of aid going to just one mujahadeen leader,
Ahmad Shah Massoud. Actually he received virtually nothing. Nearly
half of CIA money went to Gulbaddin Hekmatyar, the most hardline of
the mujahadeen. Hakmatyar in his younger days had been notorious for
throwing acid in the faces of unveiled women. You can see why that
didn't make it into the film, very difficult to show humorously.
Wilson's "sidekick" as reviewers describe him was CIA operative Gust
Avrakotos, a man who was "crude and hilarious" according to one
review. He was a "working-class" guy who ignored the stuffed shirts
and got things done. In Greece, where he was posted in the 60's and
70's people remember him differently. Avrakotos was in Greece when
army colonels overthrew the government and set up a dictatorship. He
became the CIA's chief liaison with the Greek colonels. This fascist
regime's best known victory was rolling over university students with
tanks. Its biggest defeat was getting its ass whomped when it faced
real (Turkish) soldiers in Cyprus. By 1978 Avrakotos was so villified
by the Greek press that he left the country ripe for other adventures.
In the book by George Crile that was the basis for the movie Wilson
is quoted as saying that his greatest achievement in Congress was not
getting the guns to the mujahadeen, but saving aid to the regime of
Pakistani dictator Zia al Haq. The aid was under threat because Zia
was secretly building atomic weapons, and in those days the US
pretended to be serious about the spread of such weapons. It was
against US law to give money to countries building nukes. So every
year there was a battle royal in Appropriations about the aid. Yet
Wilson had his way. Pakistani cooperation in killing Ruskies in
Afghanistan trumped the silly idea that the world should have any
kind of handle on nuclear weapons. It's a pretty funny story yet
somehow atomic bombs aren't mentioned anywhere in the movie.
Mike Nichols who directed the movie had very little to say about the
fact that the weapons we gave the mujahadeen ended up being used a a
long and bloody Afghan civil war once the Soviets left and that the
mujahadeen/warlords mutated into the Taliban and al-Qaeda. "You don't
know the consequences of any act," Nichols told a reviewer. Crap.
Brzezinki knew exactly what he and Carter were getting into. Wilson
and Reagan and the rest knew Hekmatayar was openly anti-American at
the same time they were sending him the Stingers.
At the end of the movie you see Wilson pleading unsuccessfully for a
million dollars for Afghan schools. Then after Wilson ceremoniously
gets an award from the CIA there's a black screen and a Wilson quote
something like "It was a glorious victory and then we f'd up the
endgame." As if a few schools and roads would have made the
difference. "Our guys" didn't much believe in schools. They had the
nasty habit of killing school teachers for the crime of educating girls.
This movie glorying in our "triumph" in Afghanistan fits well in
Washington's current climate where Democrats fall all over themselves
saying Iraq was a mistake, but we should be sending more money and
troops to Afghanistan. Sure, we really need to sacrifice more
American lives for a warlord "Northern Alliance" government that is
so hated that the Taliban is making a comeback
One could imagine another movie about Afghanistan, about real heroic
resistance, about the women of the Revolutionary Association of
Afghan Woman (RAWA). They've struggled against fundamentalism and all
the regimes oppressing Afghanistan since 1977. In a recent comunique
they wrote "Instead of defeating Al-Qaeda, Taliban and Gulbuddini
terrorists and disarming the Northern Alliance, the foreign troops
are creating confusion among the people of the world. We believe that
if these troops leave Afghanistan, our people will not feel any kind
of vacuum but rather will become more free and come out of their
current puzzlement and doubts. In such a situation, they will face
the Taliban and Northern Alliance without their national' mask, and
rise to fight with these terrorist enemies. Neither the US nor any
other power wants to release Afghan people from the fetters of the
fundamentalists."
The activists of RAWA work in secret at great peril inside
Afghanistan defending the very basic human rights of women. Theirs is
not a funny story, but one worth telling. I don't expect Mike Nichols
to have much interest, but you can check them out at www.rawa.org
Stanley Heller is chairperson of the Middle East Crisis Committee
(Connecticut) and host of its weekly TV program "The Struggle". He
welcomes email at mail at TheStruggle.org .
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list