[R-G] Barry Bonds: Steroids, Scapegoats, and Sweet Satisfaction
Anthony Fenton
fentona at shaw.ca
Wed Aug 8 22:30:40 MDT 2007
Barry Bonds: Steroids, Scapegoats, and Sweet Satisfaction
by Dave Zirin
August 09, 2007
http://www.zmag.org/content/showarticle.cfm?SectionID=105&ItemID=13487
Barry Bonds should be basking in the moment. The San Francisco Giants
outfielder has just passed Hank Aaron to become the all-time home-run
king of Major League Baseball. With 756 home runs, seven most-
valuable-player awards and eight gold gloves, he should be trotting
into the twilight of his career in a hail of hosannas as the finest
ballplayer of his generation. But expect no laurels, parades or calls
from President Bush.
Like the gentleman in the White House, Bonds will leave baseball a
polarized place with popularity charitably described as microscopic.
Games away from the friendly confines of San Francisco have become
celebrations of vitriol with fans screaming at pitchers to "throw at
his head" and "end his career." Death threats against his family and
person have become commonplace. Sportswriters such as Jeff Pearlman
for ESPN write articles with leads such as, "Barry Bonds is an evil
man. A truly evil man."
He has been turned into Barry bin Laden: The easy symbol for -
altogether now - "everything that is wrong with sports."
The question worth asking is why? Why is a pro athlete being treated
as if he has committed crimes against humanity? The first answer
given forth by even the casual sports fan is that "he is a cheater,"
in their eyes, an obvious habitual user of steroids. Sports
Illustrated, after selecting an all-time all-star team determined by
"a panel of experts" excluded him from the squad because his
statistics "are not to be believed." (Their concern for the
statistical integrity of Bonds career didn't stop them from including
players from before 1947 when the sport denied participation from
anyone with dark skin.)
The problem with the argument that his numbers "are not to be
believed" is that the man has never failed a drug test. Many players
who have failed tests don't garner anything close to the public
flogging that Bonds endures.
But whether or not Bonds ever put anything anabolic in his body,
there is something particularly disingenuous about putting an entire
statistically dubious era on the shoulders of one man.
The "juicing of the game" is not a question of players with syringes
in men's room stalls, but an entire industry from owners, to
trainers, to fans, to reporters, all turning a blind eye, if not
aiding and abetting a process that saw baseball players begin to
resemble pro wrestlers.
When New York Yankee Jason Giambi attempted to draw attention to this
last month, saying, "What we should have done a long time ago was
stand up - players, ownership, everybody - and said, 'We made a
mistake.' " The response from Major League Baseball was to announce
that Giambi was going to be investigated. As one player said to me,
"It's crazy that punishment is an individual issue, but distribution
has always been a team issue." They want to keep this a discussion
about it being "an individual issue" and no player attracts more
individual attention than Barry Bonds.
But steroids alone are not the reason Bonds carries this weight. He
has throughout his 23-year career committed the ultimate sin in the
eyes of the media, namely he isn't friendly to the media. Bonds'
complete lack of interest in filling their notebooks, has made him
their foil long before there were any questions about steroids.
There is no question Bonds isn't the most cuddly of players, but once
again he is hardly alone in this. When actors are less than press
friendly - think Sean Penn - they are branded eccentric artists. But
in athletics, if you don't define yourself, you become defined. Barry
Bonds has been defined as the enemy, with little regard to who the
man is behind the definition.
All of this has created an open-season atmosphere at the ballpark.
Seeing the nightly sports highlights of majority white fans letting
it all hang out against the most prominent African-American athlete
in the sport, has led many to draw their own conclusions about the
source of the anti-Bonds rage. According to an ESPN/ABC News poll
released in May, African-American fans are more than twice as likely
as their white counterparts to want Bonds to break Aaron's record of
755 homers (74 percent versus 28 percent) and nearly twice as likely
to think that the slugger has been treated unfairly (46 percent
versus 25 percent). Baseball, the national pastime, potentially a
source for unity, has instead through Bonds, become yet another
staging ground for the divisions that crisscross the land.
The shame of it all is that the sports world is so busy demonizing
Bonds, it is missing out on a piece of sports history. In many ways
we all are. There is an expression, "Trust the art not the artist."
Barry Bonds is an artist with a bat in his hand. But it's hard to
concentrate on the art, with a gathering din in the background.
Dave Zirin is the author of the book, "Welcome to the
Terrordome" (Haymarket). You can reach him at edgeofsports at gmail.com
More information about the Rad-Green
mailing list