[R-G] GOSPEL OF WORK VS. GOSPEL OF WEALTH
friends2b at sbcglobal.net
Fri Mar 10 09:09:15 MST 2006
An update from http://www.lifeboatnews.com
Paul Grignon http://www.lifeboatnews.com
Note: If email links don't work, copy and paste URL
into the address field of your browser'
From: rob at essential.org
Subject: [corp-focus] Gospel of Work vs. Gospel of Wealth
Date: January 24, 2006 2:06:19 PM PST
To: corp-focus at lists.essential.org
GOSPEL OF WORK VS. GOSPEL OF WEALTH
By Russell Mokhiber
and Robert Weissman
It was a company town.
A company region, actually.
The Mohawk Valley in upstate New York.
The Remington boys had started a gun company.
And they had come to dominate the region.
There was even company scrip.
Scrip you could use like money to buy food, and clothes.
Get a haircut.
Even donate to the local church.
And when you went to church, Mr. Remington was there.
So, if you had a complaint, you could tap him on the shoulder.
And talk about it.
People were generally happy.
the gun trust came to town.
And sabotaged the whole deal.
And down it went.
That's the story line of Worked Over: The Corporate Sabotage of An American Community
by Dimitra Doukas (Cornell University Press).
Doukas, who is now a professor at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia,
says that in the late 1800s, corporations, once they took control of production,
tried to change the culture of the United States.
From the gospel of work to what Andrew Carnegie called the gospel of wealth.
"If we look at the United States in the 19th century,
we see a popular culture that was, in a word, anti-capitalist," Doukas said.
"And this was reflected very much in the political scene of the time.
You had to be in favor of the working man.
You had to support and praise the common man.
The basic idea is that work is what dignifies a person.
It is an anti-aristocratic ideology.
It goes way back, really.
Aristocrats were characterized as parasites,
as people who lived off the work of others.
Whereas good, virtuous American people worked hard
and were expected to enjoy the fruits of their labor."
So, for example, Abraham Lincoln, in his first annual message to Congress in 1861,
makes his statement about capital and labor:
"Capital is only the fruit of labor.
Labor is the superior of capital and deserves much the higher consideration."
when the corporations came in and took over,
the major message was-- no, it's capital, not labor, that produces the wealth of society --
it's capital that deserves the greater consideration."
And this is what Doukas means by "the sabotage of an American community."
"Sabotage in the sense of undermining or continually poking at it,
first with very little sophistication,
poking at the basic value set of the society," she says.
"And the reason they poked at it is because the corporate value system could not co-exist with the American value system."
On the whole, working for the Remingtons was a positive thing.
There were no strikes. The Knights of Labor were influential at the time.
And people look back with fond memories of the time.
"To work for the Remingtons was not to have a job in our sense,"
Doukas told us.
"The people worked as contractors.
They sold what they made to the company.
They were organized into departments under a senior highly skilled craftsperson or artisan.
Each of these persons could conceive themselves as working independently."
Working people took offense at being wage slaves -- what most of us are now.
They had a sense of independence from the man.
And the man was right there in the community. You ran into the man -- on the street.
You could talk with the man.
Now, the man sits atop a giant corporation, unreachable, unknowable.
"A whole way of life was organized around working for the Remingtons,"
"People looked at it as being wholesome -- American,
virtuous, dignified -- and still today they look back at that period.
Even today, there is a tremendous sense of history among local working people.
They are tremendously critical of the present day situation."
So, there was economic democracy under the Remington family?
"In this very particular sense -- back then, you had local ownership,"
The biggest boss sits in a pew next to you in church
and was there to be buttonholed after church.
There was direct access. You can think of it as economic democracy, maybe, in the broadest sense.
But locally, it is more like a ranked system where skilled workers
saw themselves in some sense as ranking lower than the Remingtons.
the high ranking person was accessible to them.
At the same time, there was a sense of the tremendous dignity
of being a working person and creating the wealth of the country.
And this is how people spoke of it for better than a century.
So, it is democratic in the basic sense that if you had a grievance,
you could get some sort of action on it, and fairly directly.
You had a voice -- ground to stand on."
Anyone who is from upstate New York knows that it's one of the most beautiful regions of this country.
And for years it has been battered by big corporations
that don't give a damn about the region.
Doukas says there was a time when the man cared.
Hard to believe.
But it's worth taking a peek at her book and making your own judgment.
---Russell Mokhiber is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Corporate Crime Reporter, http://www.corporatecrimereporter.com. Robert Weissman is editor of the Washington, D.C.-based Multinational Monitor,
Mokhiber and Weissman are co-authors of On the Rampage: Corporate Predators and the Destruction of Democracy
(Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press).
(c) Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman
This article is posted at:
Focus on the Corporation is a weekly column written by Russell Mokhiber and Robert Weissman.
Please feel free to forward the column to friends or repost the column on other lists.
If you would like to post the column on a web site or publish it in print format,
we ask that you first contact us (russell at corporatecrimereporter.com or rob at essential.org).
Focus on the Corporation is distributed to individuals on the listserve corp-focus at lists.essential.org.
To subscribe, unsubscribe or change your address to corp-focus, go to:
or send an e-mail message to corp-focus-admin at lists.essential.org with your request.
Focus on the Corporation columns are posted at
Postings on corp-focus are limited to the columns. If you would like to comment on the columns,
send a message to russell at nationalpress.com or rob at essential.org.
More information about the Rad-Green