[R-G] On not being American - Naomi Klein

Tom Childs childst at douglas.bc.ca
Tue Jun 15 11:41:54 MDT 2004


For the Canucks on this list.

tom
````
http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20040615.wxcono15/BNStory/specialComment/

On not being American
 
It is a privilege not to be hated for your nationality, and we should
not relinquish it lightly

By NAOMI KLEIN
>From Tuesday's Globe and Mail 


 
In Baghdad, every encounter we had was a bit like going through
customs.''American?'' was the inevitable first question.''No, no,
Canadian,'' our over-eager reply.Sometimes our word wasn't good enough
and our interrogators wanted proof.
We'd pull out our passports for inspection.

On their faces, you could often see a cloud of rage pass over. Women
would sometimes let themselves smile. Kids would stop acting like
mini-commandos and run off and play. 

Don't get me wrong: Canadians aren't loved in Iraq; we just aren't, so
far as I could tell, actively loathed.

So it's wrenching being back in Canada confronting the prospect of
Stephen Harper as our next prime minister. This is a man who so longed
to join George W. Bush's coalition of the willing that he called former
defence minister John McCallum an "idiot" in the House of Commons,
declaring we should be in Iraq with the United States, "doing everything
necessary to win." This is a man who was so eager to "support the war
effort" that he went on Fox and claimed that "the silent majority of
Canadians is strongly supportive" of the invasion, defying the findings
of every credible opinion poll.

If the Conservatives are given the chance to turn Canada into more of a
card-carrying combatant in Mr. Bush's disastrous war on terrorism than
we are already, the little bit of grace I encountered in Iraq will
quickly disappear. When I go back, showing my passport to the ad hoc
inspectors could well have a very different effect.

I was in Iraq in April, at a pivotal moment when the United States
decided to wage two pre-emptive wars within a pre-emptive war, one
against the resistance in Fallujah, the other against Muqtada al-Sadr in
Najaf and Sadr City. The Los Angeles Times estimates that 800 Iraqis
have been killed in the past nine weeks of U.S. attacks on Sadr City,
even more than the 600 estimated to have died in the siege on Fallujah.

As mosques were desecrated, prisoners tortured and children killed, I
witnessed George Bush's awesome enemy-manufacturing machine up close.
Hatred of Americans soared, not just in Iraq but also in neighbouring
countries.

The retaliation began immediately: a wave of kidnappings of foreigners,
now so common they barely make the news. The change in mood was
palpable.

Anti-Americanism was no longer a sentiment; it was an uncontrollable
force of nature. Being Canadian didn't let us off the hook; we were
still part of an ugly invasion of foreign soldiers, contractors and
journalists traipsing through the country and taking what wasn't ours:
lives, jobs, oil, stories, photographs. The kidnappers didn't usually
discriminate based on nationality.

But being Canadian, or more specifically, not being American, did
sometimes open up a little window. It gave people who were suffering
permission to glimpse the humanity behind our nationality. And the
overwhelming majority of Iraqis I met -- even, miraculously, those who
had just lost children and spouses to U.S. weapons -- were profoundly
grateful for that reprieve, relieved not to have to hate. I, of course,
was even more grateful, since being not-American kept me out of serious
danger more than once.

It is a privilege not to be hated for your nationality, and we should
not relinquish it lightly. George Bush has denied that privilege to his
own people, and Stephen Harper would cavalierly strip it from Canadians
by erasing what few small but important differences remain between
Canadian and U.S. foreign policy. The danger posed by this act is not
just about whether Canadians are safe when we travel to the Middle East.
The hatred that Mr. Bush is manufacturing there, for the United States
and its coalition partners, is already following the soldiers home.

I have felt that hatred in Iraq, and trust me: We don't want to
experience it here in Canada. Or don't trust me, trust the citizens of
Spain, who decided in their March elections that they are not willing to
accept the blowback from George Bush's wars, that they don't want these
multiplying enemies to be their enemies too. Or the citizens of the
United Kingdom, who just battered Tony Blair's Labour Party in last
week's local elections, furious at being dragged into a war that has
made them less safe. Or the citizens of Australia, who are about to send
the same message to John Howard. Or even the citizens of the United
States, 55 per cent of whom now disapprove of Mr. Bush's performance in
Iraq, according to a recent Los Angles Times poll.

Yet just as the rest of the world is finally saying "no more,"
Canadians are poised to elect a party that is saying "me too."

The hawks in Washington like to paint Canada as a freeloader, mooching
off their expensive military protection, the continent's weak link on
terrorism. The truth is that around the world, it is blind government
complicity with U.S. foreign policy, precisely the kind of complicity
advocated by Mr. Harper, that is putting civilians in the line of
terror. It is the United States that is the weak link.

Before I went to Iraq, a seasoned war correspondent who had spent a
year reporting from Baghdad gave me his best piece of security advice.
"Stay away from Americans, they're bad for your health." He wasn't being
anti-American (he's an American citizen and supported the war); he was
just being practical. In Iraq, that advice means you don't want to ride
in the U.S. convoys or embed with U.S. troops. You keep your distance
and stay independent. At this perilous moment in history, the same
principle applies at home: Canadian security depends on our ability to
maintain meaningful sovereignty from the United States. Being inside the
U.S. security fortress isn't a missile shield, it's a missile magnet.

As long as the United States continues to act as a global aggressor,
the best way for us to stay healthy is to stay as far away as from
Americans as possible.

With 8,890 kilometres of shared border, geographical distance is not an
option. Fortunately, political distance still is. Let's not surrender
it.

Naomi Klein is the author of No Logo and Fences and Windows.
 



--
Tom Childs - Audio/Visual Resources
Douglas College Library
New Westminster, B.C. Canada
T: 604 527-5713 - Library
T: 604 524-9316 - Lulu Island
E: childst at douglas.bc.ca 
U: BCGEU Local 703
W: http://www.globaljustice.ca 
   
     "There's no way to delay, that trouble comin' everyday."
                                    --Frank Zappa





More information about the Rad-Green mailing list