[R-G] New York Times & Washington Post: Only Pro-Israel Lies Need Apply

Sun Feb 22 22:11:38 MST 2004

(Sunday 22 February 2004)
MediaMonitors
http://world.mediamonitors.net/

New York Times & Washington Post: Only Pro-Israel Lies Need Apply

by

Mohamed Khodr

"Two of the most powerful institutions to support Israel are the two most
influential papers in America that more than any other give guidance to our
foreign policy establishment."

"I've never seen a President -- I don't care who he is -- stand up to them
[the Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want.
The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I
wasn't writing anything down. If the American people understood what a grip
those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our
citizens certainly don't have any idea what goes on."

-- Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Quoted in Paul Findley's They Dare to Speak Out: People and Institutions
Confront Israel's Lobby"

"Israeli intelligence knew beforehand that Iraq had no weapons stockpiles
and misled US President George W Bush."

-- Yossi Sarid, a member of the Israel's Foreign Affairs and Defense
Committee in the Knesset (The Age: February 4, 2004)

"In the course of the past year, a new belief has emerged in the town
(Washington D.C.): the belief in war against Iraq. That ardent faith was
disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of
them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals (a partial list: Richard
Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles
Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and
are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history."

-- Haaretz, Israeli paper: By Ari Shavit: "White Man's Burden" , March 4,
2003

It is no coincidence that "Arabs" and "Islam" became enemies of the
"American" state only after the founding of Israel.  Prior to Israel's
founding the United States enjoyed great relations with the Arab and Muslim
world especially in their mutual antipathy to Communism.

All that changed when Israel's Zionist founders understood that in order to
secure America's patronage, it's treasury, it's weapons, and its important
Vetoes at the United Nations Security Council, they must drive a wedge, a
fence, a wall, in essence a beltway around the corridors of Washington D.C.
that only allows Zionist garbage in and American garbage out.

American Jews who did not suffer under the Holocaust adopted Israel as their
truest religion:  Israel "right or wrong", Labor or Likud, murderous or
peaceful, anti-America's interest or not, they dedicated their money, their
controlled institutions like Hollywood, the Media, and Wall Street to the
abject service to Israel, damn America and it's naive, isolated, uninformed
populace.   American Jews are too educated, too rich, too expert on the use
of lies, myths, propaganda, i.e. a people whose history depends on the power
of "words and images", a people too clever for the average American Joe
whose thoughts and deeds already reflect the power of marketing and
advertisements.

Enter the "Judeo-Christian" world, enter the "shared values", enter the
"only democratic ally" in the Middle East, enter the "strategic special
relationship" that protects America's interests in the oil rich Middle East,
enter "what's good for Israel is good for America"; finally enter the most
creative Zionist invention after the fall of Communism (a system introduced
by European Jews in the Soviet Union that led to the massacred of tens of
millions of Christians and Muslims, affirmed by none other than Winston
Churchill himself)---ISLAM, THE NEW THREAT TO AMERICA AND "WESTERN
CIVILIZATION", although it was Islam that civilized the West..

"The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of
private power to a  point where it becomes stronger than their democratic
state itself. That, in essence, is fascism -- ownership of government by an
individual, by a group, or any controlling power."

-- Franklin D. Roosevelt

The Zionist hold on Washington D.C. is so powerful and intimidating that no
politician for any office believes he/she can win without the requisite
pandering to America's Jews and a visit to the Holocaust Museum in
Washington D.C. (built at taxpayer expense unlike the World War II Veteran
Memorial refused money by Congress).  No American dares speak publicly
against the atrocities of Israel whether against innocent Palestinians or
even American soldiers or civilians (USS Liberty attack or murder of Rachel
Corrie)---if they do there is hell to pay.  But Americans do speak against
Israel and Jewish influence but only in soft whispers in private
conversations.  That's the reason that the Jewish lobby won't even allow a
hint of criticism against Israel without unleashing the powerful scarlet
letter "A" for Anti-Semitism.  They know if they don't squelch any and all
criticism, Americans will awaken to the theft of their treasury, $3 Trillion
since 1949, theft of their military and industrial intelligence, spying on
their patron ally, theft of their foreign policy that does Israel's killing
upon Israel's, not America's enemies, and theft of their own international
reputation and credibility.  Americans would rather fight the entire Muslim
world, 1.3 Billion, than switch from their fear and intimidation of Israel
and its Jewish lobby.  It pays to be silent against Israel, there's money
and positions to be had.  So much for exporting "democracy" to the Muslim
world when our own democracy is submissive to the powerful few in fear and
silence.

Two of the most powerful institutions to support Israel are the two most
influential papers in America that more than any other give guidance to our
foreign policy establishment.  Our politicians have grown to trust Israel's
"expertise" when it comes to Arabs and Muslims.  Indeed such infidels only
understand force:  Israeli force paid for by Americans from Iowa to New
York, from Florida to California.  These two papers are the Jewish owned New
York Times and Washington Post.  The blood, starvation, sickness and hunger
of the third world masses don't engender an editorial but look out if
there's any hint of "Anti-Semitism" anywhere in the world, the mighty Jewish
pens rip the culprits to shreds, whether it's Pat Buchanan, Rep. Jim Moran,
or Jacques Chirac.  It's not nice to criticize the Jewish mother nature.

In addition to being Israel's doormat these papers like other media's
(mostly also owned or run by American Jews) exclude any debate or criticism
of Israel by the many courageous American Jews, Christians or Muslims who
put America's interest above a small foreign nation's and who seek to bring
peace and true democracy around the world.   Our biased media ensured the
lies of Bush and his Jewish "Neocons" to get us into the killing quagmire of
Iraq.  Dying American soldiers hardly merit a mention in the overall
discussion of Iraq's debacle, as long as Israel's interests won in getting
America to pay and die for it's protection.

This is the truth that most Americans do understand but are afraid to ask.
The idiotic use of Anti-Semitism by Jews who are neither true Semites nor
are descendents of the original Israeli's is hypocritical and most dangerous
to our national interests.   Our brave politicians continue to pay Israel
for it's illegal settlements, it's building of a wall that steals more
Palestinian land, for all of Israel's wars, for all its alleged peace
agreements, and for compensating settlers to move into or evacuate occupied
land..

AMERICA, IT'S YOUR MONEY, IT'S YOUR CHILDREN'S LIVES.

Below are just two examples of letters I submitted to the New York Times and
Washington Post.  No wonder they weren't published.  When on the rare
occasions they do publish a critical letter on Israel it's usually so mild
as to be meaningless but along with such one letter they publish three or
four letters supporting Israel.

If this is the "democracy" we want to export, then let's not bother, already
the Arab/Muslim nations are autocratic forbidding freedom of speech or
criticism of the regimes.

By the way I am a Semite, an American Muslim, and an American patriot.
Before I seek to liberate the Arabs/Muslim world from autocracy, I want to
liberate my own nation from the oppression of Israel and it's Zionist cabal
of Christian and Jewish Zionists who first seek Israel's glory only then to
destroy it and the world in a mushroom cloud of Armageddon.

LETTER TO NEW YORK TIMES:

RE: "Who Is to Blame for the Creation of Palestinian Refugees? by Ethan
Bronner, Feb. 20, 2004

Winners have always written history much akin to the adage "those that
control the news, control the views". Middle East History in the "civilized"
world is a western monologue usually absolving the "white west", creating
self centered narratives of benefiting and civilizing the "barbarian"; while
debating the merits of crusades, invasions, occupation, even killing, as an
academic or electoral exercise without mentioning the "victims" suffering.
Such is the case today in Iraq and Palestine.  Mr. Morris not only
contradicts himself but other esteemed Israeli historians..  In March/April
1998 in Tikkun Magazine Mr. Morris wrote in "A Personal Assessment of the
Zionist Experience" that the Zionist Plan from Herzl to Ben Gurion stressed
displacement and dispossession to create a "Jewish" state.  Mr. Morris
quotes Herzl's diary:  "Both the process of expropriation and the removal of
the poor must be carried out discreetly and circumspectly." (at the time
Palestinians were 90% of the Population).  He quotes Ben Gurion (1937):
"The transfer of the population is what makes possible a comprehensive
[Jewish] settlement plan."

According to Yesha'ayahu Ben-Porat: "One truth is that there is no Zionism,
no settlement, and no Jewish state without evacuating Arabs, and without
expropriating lands and their fencing off." (Yedi'ot Aharonot 07/14/1972)

Today in Israel, forceful "transfer" of Palestinians is a viable political
option among Sharon's cabinet with wide political support.

LETTER TO WASHINGTON POST:

Democracy is to be introduced to the Middle East (Bush Aims for "Greater"
MidEast Plan" Robin Wright Feb. 9), not by the people, for the people, and
of the people but by the same western governments who've colonized, robbed,
massacred, lied, implemented autocratic regimes (including Saddam Hussein
first hired by the CIA in the early 1960's to assassinate Iraq's leader),
and who forcefully implanted European Jews into Palestine creating the
"democratic Jewish only" homeland, Israel, the real ground zero for the
MidEast conflict for 56 years.

Bush, an undemocratically elected President, a Christian evangelist, who
undemocratically misled America and the world into an invasion of Iraq, who
has shunned every international agreement, has made the U.N. truly
irrelevant, whose administration has shredded the Constitution and due
process in our own country, who's created a world of tension, broken
alliances, and who disallows dissent, a biblical president who's self
assured of his goodness versus world evil, a man of oil interests; now seeks
to bring "democracy" to the very nations America has supported as long as
they submit to America's "national interest", mainly oil and money.

America's sole and greatest "democratic" gift to the Middle East is to reign
Israel's messianic militarism and free the Palestinians from bondage,
secondly, free the Middle East from autocratic regimes, understand true
Islam, and implement the already rich graveyard of U.N. Resolutions and
initiatives America and Israel reject.  To the Arabs, "Greater MidEast Plan"
sounds uncomfortably too close to "Greater Israel".

Democracy is a behavior of peoples not a sound byte for re-election

---------

http://world.mediamonitors.net/content/view/full/5063/

------------