[R-G] a note on style

[Macdonald Stainsby]

To answer George's inquiry- all that should be left of the prior message is
simple: What is needed for the response to make sense on it's own. Maurice's
post was the entire previous digest reposted. This is unacceptable. We can trim
and cut it to just what we need fairly easily.

Macdonald

----- Original Message -----
From: "George Snedeker" <snedeker at concentric.net>
To: <rad-green at lists.econ.utah.edu>
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2001 7:30 AM
Subject: [R-G] a note on style


>
> I left part of Maurices's message so peephole could see what I was referring
> to? if that style of doing thing is a problem, I will remove the text I am
> referring to. I thought that it would just make it easier for people to see
> my point.
>
> George