[R-G] But not every Hades is worth supporting...

[Gorojovsky]

En relación a Re: [R-G] What the Arab Press in Saying, 
el 6 Oct 01, a las 18:02, Macdonald Stainsby dijo:

> If Hades were at war with American imperialism, ther victory would be
> progressive in that it weakened (militarily, politically and morally) the
> ability of said imperialism from going on further ventures

Not if Hades were an imperialist country. This is why so many "leftists" are 
duped by the propaganda effort which presents relatively large and unifying 
partialities in the Third World as "sub-imperialisms". Nasser was "imperialist" 
when he attempted the United Arab Republic with Syria and Irak, and of course 
his war in Yemen was a "colonial" war. The Serbian government was "sub-
imperialist" in trying to keep Yugoslavia stitched together. The Argentineans 
were "sub-imperialists" when they tried to establish agreements with Brazil, 
Bolivia or Chile during the late 40s and early 50s, and so are the Brazilians 
today when they defend the Mercosur!

It is twice as important, then, to be ears up as to the actual character of the 
situations at stake.


Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
gorojovsky at arnet.com.ar