[Marxism] Afghanistan (was: Betancourt's halo [SIC] underspotlightm,
S. Artesian
sartesian at earthlink.net
Mon Mar 2 12:54:17 MST 2009
I agree with J on this. Hard to imagine, back then I guess, that the class
line passed through Afghanistan and defending the PDPA from the capitalist
assault by proxy-- but it did, and the world is so much worse off that the
mujaheddin were victorious-- thanks to Carter and Reagan.
----- Original Message -----
From: <Jscotlive at aol.com>
To: <sartesian at earthlink.net>
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 1:21 PM
Subject: [Marxism] Afghanistan (was: Betancourt's halo [SIC]
underspotlightm,
>
> I dispute Fred's analysis of Afghanistan. I do agree that the methods
> adopted by the PDPA with regard to the feudal structure that prevailed in
> the
> countryside were crude. However, given what came after, I suggest their
> attempt to
> drag Afghanistan into the 20th century was one that all socialists and
> Marxists should properly describe as progressive.
> With regard to Fred's nonsensical point re Afghanistan not having been
> returned to feudalism, perhaps he has another name for a nation largely
> ruled by
> warlords complete with the power of life and death over those living
> under
> their rule.
More information about the Marxism
mailing list