[Marxism] Thoughts on 8 Theses
S. Artesian
sartesian at earthlink.net
Mon Mar 2 05:04:00 MST 2009
Sure. Mostly I disagree.
Agree that neo-classical conceptions have crept in-- and most neo-classical
of all, and most of the creeping is in this notion of trade imbalances--
trade imbalances neither reflect nor cause breakdowns in capitalism as
capital-- as the reproduction of expanded value.
As a matter of fact this dependence, reliance, on trade imbalance theory is
a little more than neo-classical. It is positively mercantilist. Engels
wrote an interesting piece in 1843 in the Jahrbucher on the critique of
political economy; includes a great attack on mercantilist "balance of
trade" worhippers.
The proof, more or less, of the inapplicability of "balance of trade"
theorizing, you provide when you make the analogy between agriculture and
city-- absolutely-- cities "import" much more from the countryside than
they "export" to the countryside-- that's an index to the relative
development of the city over the countryside-- this doesn't make the city
financially or economically subservient to the countryside-- to the
production of exchange value in agriculture. There is no NEED in capitalism
for balance; for balance between industry and agriculture-- balance is
necessary in barter, but not in capitalist exchange. Profit is what counts.
Expanded value. Not balance.
Financial investment has always been intrinsic to capitalist development,
just as international, global expansion has always been intrinsic to
domestic capital investment. The bulk of the value generated, appropriated
by the advanced capitalist countries is most certainly NOT value
expropriated, seized, looted, unequally exchanged from "foreign
exploitation" if you mean by foreign exploitation-- super-profits derived
from poorer, less-developed countries. The overwhelming bulk of
imperialist investment is inter-imperialist, or maybe better
INTRA-imperialist, the overwhelming source of profits is, again, inter/intra
imperialist, and is not derived from investments in the less-developed
countries.
Regarding productive cores and advance countries-- US still provides the
largest portion of the world's industrial production-- about 24-21% [think
this is a 2007 figure] and even poor old decadent super-annuated Britain has
a manufacturing sector providing about 15% of GDP-- not very much less than
France's ratio.
----- Original Message -----
From: "D OC" <donaloc at hotmail.com>
To: <sartesian at earthlink.net>
Sent: Monday, March 02, 2009 6:30 AM
Subject: [Marxism] Thoughts on 8 Theses
More information about the Marxism
mailing list