[Marxism] Is Cuba really turning to GM crops?
Waistline2 at aol.com
Waistline2 at aol.com
Mon Mar 2 00:01:04 MST 2009
In a message dated 3/1/2009 11:33:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
theguavatree at gmail.com writes:
On 3/1/09, David Picón Álvarez <david at miradoiro.com> wrote:
> From: "Ruthless Critic of All that Exists" <ok.president+nbsy at gmail.com>
>
> > In any case,Cuba needs to be applauded for not kow-towing to the
> > Luddite, reflexively anti-GM greenie-green bandwagon.
>
>
> Absolutely. A good part of this opposition seems to be rooted in
> quasi-religious views about the goodness of nature
FROM HYBRIDS, TO FOOD IRRADIATION, TO GMOS: The Blade Runner Paradox.
The process of hybridization of food began when humans first began to
cultivate the wild foods that grew in their environments. Hybridization became more
sophisticated over the years as humans noticed certain traits in foods and
in order to enhance those traits began to selectively breed plants with other
plants, within the same genus. (This process was also occurring in the animal
kingdom. Most of the animals that surround human lifestyles are domesticated
from their wild cousins: cows, dogs, chickens, cats, turkeys, etc.) Desirable
traits in plants often include greater and more consistent size, sweeter,
more pronounced taste, smaller or no seeds, brighter colors. Most of the foods
that we consume today have been through the selective breeding process to
produce familiar foods. These include most vegetables, like potatoes, corn,
tomatoes, apples, carrots, broccoli, rice, all greens, cauliflower, as well as
most of the animal foods consumed.
The process of selective breeding for desirable traits began the subtle
alteration of the DNA of the foods. Minor changes in gene sequence and structure
that allows for the desirable traits activate or deactivate the genes for the
traits of the occurrence of the organism in nature.
The subtle alteration of the DNA of the food that humans consume will affect
subtle alteration of the DNA of those consuming the food. This happens when
the food is broken down into cellular and subcellular components and then in
some cases is restructured to the configuration that the body can use. In
other cases the cellular and subcellular components are easily bioassimilable.
When these components are less than optimal, they may be usable by the body,
but important components are missing. This causes the cells to mitosis daughter
cells that look identical but have subtle flaws in their gene sequences.
Thus, begins the slow decline, the degeneration or devolution of a people into a
less conscious, less connected, less aware state. Constitutional cellular
weakening can and often appears in generation cycles, traditionally requiring
up to seven generations to correct.
In this state of historic disconnection, metabolic breach, from self and
environment – which is microcosm and macrocosm, internal and external – the
devolution and warping of consciousness causes increase in fear to be a prime
motivator; and when combined with relentless production for exchange value,
inexorably results in maddening and insane attempts to control energy in all its
forms, rather than to use focused energy and intention to create and flow
with observed outcomes, in harmony with the natural order of the earth itself. .
These "disconnected ones," in fear of the environment, fearing organisms, “
germs, viruses, bacteria, molds,” developed food irradiation as a means of
eliminating “pathogens” from foods. The "disconnected ones" in their greed
state, unable or unwilling to sense the subtle shift in the energy of the
irradiated food, purported to bamboozle the consumers into consuming more and more
dead genetically selected, radioactive food. Consumers in the classic “
double-think” fear-state could not recognize the term “radiation” in food “
irradiation” and also unable to see or sense the subtle shifts in energy patterns of
the foods, continue, lazily oblivious, to ingest radioactive food. Greed has
a biological component buttressed and reproduced as capital and the capital
relations. All of us intimately know the cycle but not a conscious level and
most certainly not on the level as Marxist outlook, which speaks to why this
cycle is self reproduced as an intimate part of the value relations. The
body enters a cycle of relentless craving because its cellular structure has
been weakened and is not being sustained and reproduced by molecularly complete
fruits and vegetation. One becomes and remains hungry while bodily "full."
Completely disconnected, suffering from metabolic breach, with subtly
altered DNA, in an increased and artificially created fear state and irradiated;
the consumers in the U.S. have now been ingesting transgenic food for 10 years.
Ten years ago this subject was discussed here on Marxism with more sympathy
for th protest, riots and opposition to what was then called "frankenfood" in
Europe. At that time European governments were refusing to allow genetically
altered American meats in their markets. Somewhere in Marxism archives these
discussions can be found.
Trans-genetic food, commonly termed “genetically modified” (frankenfood) is
yet the most insidious form of DNA manipulation occurring to date.
Genetically modified organisms cross classification, genus, and even species that arose
in the evolution of the myriad of life forms on the planet. The danger comes
from combining gene sequences in ways that violate the subtle laws of
evolution and creation out of which all life forms have arisen – until now.
With the same selective breeding mentality that brought about hybridization,
albeit with greater technology, and now driven by the pursuit of exchange
value, the idea of selecting certain desired traits continues at a higher
level. The real problem is that "desired traits" is established as and on the
basis of the value relation and the law of unknown long term results. Most folks
of my generation still remember "real tomatoes" without the thick skins, "to
meaty insides" and less robust juices, whose properties had evolved over ages
in unison with the nature that is man/women.
With the advent of gene mapping, researchers can now isolate the gene that
contains the desired trait, and/or import desired traits to enhance
marketability. Apples are far to hard and depleted of much of their alkaline juice
properties. With the use of a rather relatively unsophisticated technology,
known as a “gene gun”, the desired genes are “fired” into the sequence of the
DNA of the cells of the target organism. The result, hard strawberries with
fish genes, hard tomatoes with potato genes, sheep with monkey genes and other
such combinations as befit the fancy of the financiers of the research, at
the call of the madmen of finance capital. More often, the traits of single
celled organisms are fired into the gene sequences of the target organisms.
The hardness, firmness and rate of decay of vegetables is historically
evolved and alters the human body through our senses, also historically evolved,
the optimal time in which to consume these foods. Mother nature cannot be
fooled, although the body can be fooled - blunted, in such a way that we no
longer remember life's biological cycles. Capitalism in agriculture has not
reckoned well with ecology because nature is torn from its normal biological -
metabolic, cycles. Once upon a time beautiful "Sun Flowers" golden heads would
literally follow the sun across the sky, which is why they were called sun
flowers. Today, sunflowers hang their heads in same at their debasement,
hybridization and being transported to areas that does not support their unique
properties.
Genetic engineering crosses the phenotype barrier to genotype.
Phenotype is the appearance or manifestation of the gene sequence, whereas
genotype relates to the actual gene structure. Hybridization of foods must
still followed certain laws of nature because it allowed whole series of genes to
be transmitted between plants within the same genus. For example, a white
rose could be bred with a red rose to produce a pink rose. We are still talking
about plant to plant transmission, within the same family, rose. There is a
whole series of genes that is transmitted to the offspring from both parents.
Whereas with genetic engineering, only one gene or a snippet of a gene is
introduced into the target organism, without knowledge of what that one gene
inserted into an already existing sequence will produce. Thus the gene is
inserted without the accompaniment of other genes or gene sequences with which
that gene has existed for millennia. With genetic engineering we cross species
barriers in performance of experiments that have not occurred in this cycle of
existence. Perhaps we have forgotten that tampering with natural and
physical laws have brought about the end of all of the other great cycles on earth?
Including things like patterns of bird migration.
Further, much of the subtle alteration of genes remain below the eye, even
when using the most powerful microscope, and below the understanding of the
observer, who more often that not does not deeply understand what is being
viewed because a desired result block their field of vision.
The dangers of genetically modifying organisms has been underplayed and it
is not in the interest of the agrochemical companies that produce these
combinations to disclose all of their facts. In fact, there are currently no
labeling requirements for genetically modified foods. In the U.S., if the food is
not labeled, “non-GMO,” then it is safe to assume that it is genetically
modified. This process started quietly in 1995 when Americans were distracted by
the Gulf War, “Monica Lewinskya," and the Clinton administration destroying
"welfare as we know it." Meanwhile, around the world, most other countries
vehemently protested and defrayed the attempts of Monsanto, Novaris, Dow and
others to push gmos down their throats. The agrochemical companies quietly
lobbied, wooed, seduced and bedded their counterparts in Congress. And in fact
there is a revolving door policy between the government and these big chemical
companies. For example, Donald Rumsfeld, current Secretary of Defense, held
a position of at Monsanto.
Moreover, the genetic modification of food assures, unless there is a
successful counter movement, the elimination of genetic diversity that has existed
on this planet for millennia. It is a mistake to label these spontaneous
movements quackery. Since all that we have to consume is increasingly genetically
altered food, how is that affecting us? It has been proven that genetically
modified organisms, through the natural propagation processes of plants,
infests, supersedes and eliminates non-gmo foods in the field. Also, there is a
concerted effort by the agrochemical companies to eliminate heirloom seeds. In
the past several years, aggressive grassroots movements have arisen around
the globe to preserve heirloom seeds and thus all of our genetic heritage.
All genetically altered food is not bad because it has been altered.
Capitalism alters food in its image: value expansion at all cost.
Several years ago Monsanto began taking farmers to court whose fields their
seeds found their way into and the farmers harvested the fruits and
vegetables. Monsanto claimed this produce as their property and could prove its genetic
markers as theirs, regardless to the fact that the culprit was the wind.
No references provided, no links, no author. However, all of the material is
available on line for those who seek the information.
WL.
Los Angeles 2017 - Blade Runner.
Roy Batty a synthetic human, has escape from an off world colony, high
jacked a ship, made his way to earth; discovers the emotional pain of life and
death basis. Roy is capital in pants and leather jacket. With a life cycle; a
historical limit,
. . . . as does all productive forces
and mode of productions. Roy is a productive force.
Roy makes his way to the uppermost ribbon in the sky to meet his maker.
Mister Tyrel
Tyrel: "I'm surprise you did not come here sooner."
Roy: "Its not an easy thing to meet your maker.
Tyrel: "What can he do for you?"
Roy: "Can the maker repair what he makes?"
Tryel: "Would you like to be modified?"
Roy: "I had in mind something a little more radical."
Tyrel: "What seems to be the problem?"
Roy: "Death!"
Tyrel: "Death?"
"Well, I'm afraid that's a little out of my jurisdiction . . . you . . ."
( Roy pleads, )
"I want more life father."
Tyrell: "The facts of life. To make an alteration in the evolution of an
organic life system is fatal. A coding sequence cannot be revised once it has
been established."
Roy: "Why Not?"
Tyrell: "Because, by the second day of incubation, any cells that have
undergone reversion mutations give rise to revenant colonies, like rats leaving a
sinking ship, then the ship sinks."
Roy: "What about EMS recombination?"
Tyrell: "We already tried it. Ethyl Methane Sultanate as an alkalizing agent
and a potent mutagen. It created . . . a virus so lethal the subject was
dead before he left the table."
Roy; " Then a repressor protein, that blocks the operating cells."
Tyrel: "It wouldn't obstruct replication, but it does give rise to an error
in replication, so that the newly formed DNA strands carry a mutation and
you've got a virus again.
But, uh, all of this is academic. You were made as well as we could make
you."
Roy: "Not to last."
Tyrell: "The light that burns twice as bright, burns half as long. And you
have burnt so very very bright Roy. Look at you. You're the prodigal son.
You're quite a prize."
Roy: "I've . . .gone questionable things."
Tyrel: "Also extraordinary things. Revel in your time."
Roy: "Nothing the god of bio mechanics wouldn't let you in heaven for."
**************Need a job? Find employment help in your area.
(http://yellowpages.aol.com/search?query=employment_agencies&ncid=emlcntusyelp00000005)
More information about the Marxism
mailing list