[Marxism] Shah's son

[S. Artesian]

I really don't get it Brad.  I thought I did engage what you said.  And I 
have yet to hear you or anybody on "that side" engage the issue of the 
precipitating force in this conflict.

As a matter of fact, you engage with nothing, other than your own 
perceptions-- so apparently there is no link in these demonstrations, and 
their forms of manifestation, to any issues of accumulation and 
reproduction; no linkage in these demonstrations to any other struggles in 
Iranian history; no linkage in these struggles to other struggles of women 
for equal treatment.   What you offer is not critical analysis, it's 
ideological posing.

I never watch CNN, or TV for that matter, except for Yankee games, and 
that's been a fool's errand for the last 6 years.  I have no idea what CNN 
is reporting, but I can guess.

Simple question:  Do you support the attempts to suppress the demonstrations 
by the official, and non-official government forces?   Yes or no?  My answer 
is no.

Anothe simple question:  During the US presidential campaign, police and 
"posses" do attack a joint NARAL/NAACP demonstration in support of Obama. 
Do you defend the the demonstrators?  My answer is yes.

If referring to the apparent domination of "right wing" elements in the 
previous emerging class struggles in Poland, and China is a straw man-- so 
be it.  Take your Benadryl. Available without a prescription.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "brad bauerly" <bbauerly at gmail.com>
To: <sartesian at earthlink.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 5:35 PM
Subject: [Marxism] Shah's son