[Marxism] Some Info on Safe Train Separation
S. Artesian
sartesian at earthlink.net
Wed Jul 8 13:58:57 MDT 2009
For Les and David in particular:
And a note, "flickering" track circuits are not unheard of the railroad
industry. For the general railroad network, FRA requires periodic testing
to confirm the integrity of track circuits, lack of grounds, absence
conductivity of stray currents, or ground conductivity of current across
insulated joints.
In third rail DC-electrified territory, AC track circuits are used and can
be coded in a range of precise frequencies to give different speed
authorizations based on conditions ahead. This is the basis for cab signal
systems. With this system, impedance bonds are installed to maintain the
traction power continuity but isolate the track circuits to specific defined
"blocks" of track.
Certainly an intermittent failure might go unnoticed if no train was
following a train in the section of track that had the defective
circuitry... but the fact that maintenance was performed on just that
section of track 5 days before the collision-- and that an impedance bond
was changed, would indicate to me that there was a known indication of a
problem before the actual event.
When AC traction is utilized, or AC is generated by on-board equipment to
provide "hotel power"-- lighting, heating, air-conditioning-- the frequency
generated by the equipment must not be in the frequency range utilized by
the track circuits to determine occupancy, otherwise a train can be standing
on the track and the equipment on-board a following train could "overpower"
the track circuitry indication and provide a "false clear" cab signal to the
following train.
__________________
More information about the Marxism
mailing list