[Marxism] Socialist Policy in World War Two
nada
dwaltersMIA at gmail.com
Thu Jul 2 13:33:10 MDT 2009
"Another hypothetical: What if the US Navy had been allowed to defend
Hawaii?" asks Intense Red.
Good question. But easily answered by subsequent US actions against the
Japanese: the US would of had it's add handed to them. Assuming for a
minute we are not talking about a battleship war lobbing shells at each
other, alone, the US would of lost, and badly. In fact, it's good thing
for the U.S. navy that the carriers were not only missing from Pearl,
but didn't even shortly engage them. Almost every air encounter between
the US and Japan for the year after Peal Harbor went very, very badly
for the US.
US Navy pilots were some of the least experienced fighter pilots among
the imperialists powers. The Japanese had some of the best. The US navy
had the least technologically advanced fighters (wildcats vs zero). US
carrier attack techniques were probably the worse AND US carriers were
probably the least 'best built' carriers of anyone (the British had the
best ones of anyone, smaller 'pocket ' carriers with highly armored
flight decks).
About the only 'change' in this history that was reasonable would of
been for the US battleship fleet to have also disappeared from Peal
Harbor that Sunday morning and thus they could of been used in
subsequent campaigns against the Japanese later in the war.
But in all seriousness, I don't think the US Navy could of defended
Pearl Harbor even if it wanted to.
David
More information about the Marxism
mailing list