[Marxism] Another scumbag college president
Louis Proyect
lnp3 at panix.com
Mon Feb 23 13:58:05 MST 2009
http://nymag.com/news/features/54685/
Bob Kerrey's Ivory-Tower War
The New School president lost his lower leg in Vietnam, fought countless
battles in the Senate, even ran for president. But nothing prepared him
for the insurrection he now faces.
One could argue that Bob Kerrey had experienced far worse in his life
than the eloquent earfuls he got on the morning of December 16. But the
meeting, convened by the former senator on short notice in the New
School’s Tishman auditorium, still could not have been easy. Just days
before, 94 percent of the full-time faculty had given Kerrey a vote of
no confidence. About ten students, all with duct tape over their mouths,
had plunked themselves down in the second row and refused to leave. (Two
days later, an even larger group would occupy a dining hall for more
than 30 hours.) The proceedings themselves were mostly civilized, with
faculty standing patiently in the aisles and waiting their turns at the
microphones, but there were over 200 of them, and few on his side. Arien
Mack, editor of Social Research, told Kerrey he was destroying the
university to which she’d dedicated her life; Robert Polito, director of
the writing program, told him the fall semester was “the most
institutionally difficult, troubling, and simply worst” that many of his
colleagues had ever experienced. When the Town Hall concluded, the
philosopher Richard Bernstein took the microphone. “There’s been much
discussion today about what a no-confidence vote means, Bob,” he told
Kerrey. “I’ll tell you what it means. It means the most important thing
it can mean at a university. It means you’ve lost the trust of your
faculty.”
Weeks later, as I sit down with Kerrey to discuss this vote, he repeats
to me, with heartfelt sincerity, what he told his faculty: Yes, he
recognizes there are problems with his leadership, particularly his
habit of tearing through provosts like popcorn, and he’s working on
them. But he also sounds annoyed—and suspicious of, rather than
chastened by, the near unanimity of the vote. “There’s tremendous peer
pressure,” he says. “It’s impossible not to have significant minorities
of the faculty saying, ‘All in all, it hasn’t been bad—pay’s gone up, we
got tenure, there’s more of us, we’ve got a faculty senate, we’ve got a
student senate, he answers our e-mail … ’ ”
(clip)
More information about the Marxism
mailing list