[Marxism] White workers history, proletarian internationalist formula (sorry
Waistline2 at aol.com
Waistline2 at aol.com
Mon Feb 2 20:55:59 MST 2009
(sorry wrong version; rough draft, previously sent)
The explanatory power of Marxism is its insistent on class and property as
the foundation and pivot of social life. Marx method informs one that all
social movement and motion of classes requires studying their history; the
economic, social and political environment in which social relations (production
relations) are played out; the contending and intersection of class with their
invisible connections and so forth. Even the personality of individuals is
considered to the degree that their personality expresses the mood of the
moment and becomes a material forces is guiding the masses along what ever path
they are following.
President Obama like all presidents represent a class that has political
representatives writing the national and international agenda for their classes
behavior in the political sphere. The capitalist class represents all classes
in America, as understood and governed by the capitalist class policy and
agenda, and that in a nutshell is the problem.
In moments of exuberate enthusiasm, individuals and even classes tend to see
themselves and their aspirations, to one degree or another, represented in
the popular leader. When the popular leader or the supreme popular leader
speaks of the concerns of the lower classes and then promise to help them in
their economic and political struggles, the masses rightfully sing and dance
and listen.
I listened and followed the Obama campaign and did not believe he could win
Iowa, but he did to my amazement. I did not believe that a black man, no
matter what his politics could win even a Senate seat, much less President,
unless they were the kind of person that licked boots - including the sole/soul,
of our bourgeois masters; or a black man had to be something like a male
Condelezza Rice. Talk about being wrong . . . .again.
I did not believe that Obama could win the Democratic Party nomination for
a complex of reasons of which white supremacy ideology was an important
factor, but only one of many factors. For instance, his appeal to broad sections
of voting America - (not the real proletariat or the lowest wage workers),
on the matter of a "National Health Care" package seemed out of alignment
with voting America. Voting America, big and smaller employers alike wanted
the economic burden of health care to be shifted on to the back of government
for sound economic reasons; profits.
Then Obama's public talk about killing an individual in the war against
terrorism seemed to violate the protocols of even bourgeois politics. Talk of
murder and assassinations is generally left to the fanatic religious like
lapdogs of capital in the mode of . . . you know who. Then I felt that the
Clinton machine and the undeserved adulation voting black America felt towards the
Clinton machine was to strong for them to break. "Clinton was the man."
"Clinton was really the first Black President."
Although Clinton did what no Republican President could - (changing welfare
as we know it, economically hurting blacks and all poor, while lowering the
bottom rung of the economic ladder by which the working class could be
pushed), blacks struck with Clinton through thick and thin. As a black man - old
school Negro meaning I ain't like that Obama, I understood why the love
affair with Clinton, but it would piss me off.
President Clinton was by no stretch of imagination a white supremacists in
any aspect of his life and personality and the personal charisma - juice, was
overwhelming. Yet, he did to the workers - NAFTA, what no Republican
President could do, and proven in the flesh he was not hung up on color.
Then a part of me also felt that voting America was not ready for a women
President and most certainly not more of the Clinton machine. A huge section
of white voting America had enough of the Clinton's, even while the blacks
clung to his legs.
Wrong, wrong wrong!
In May of last year I went to Detroit to take part in my brothers retirement
Party - 40 years employed by Chrysler and an International representative
of the UAW.
All the big "muckity mucks" were present from the company and union as well
as the top layer union reps from a dozen or so Chrysler facilities. You
know, the guys and dolls with perfect teeth from using dental plan and politician
hand shakes that pulled you up close, only to be overwhelmed with genuine
bears hugs that bent ones back in the most uncompromising position.
Momentarily I buried a deep distrust and dislike for some of these folks, especially
from the Chrysler section of the union. Much of this dislike is from
experiencing their ignorance and contempt for reading books and staying abreast of
issues. Sadly, many of the top leaders cannot read and comprehend the union
contract, which is a legal and complex document. Privilege in the way of higher
paychecks and excess time the ordinary worker will never receive in his work
life, should mean one should educate themselves when given the opportunity
and now and again give out copies of the Communist Manifesto.
"Yea, that his communist fucking brother he's been saving all his life."
"Don't day that shit so loud, y'all know how he is about his brother."
Yea, brother was the man with acute political instinct and an encyclopedic
knowledge of the contract compelling the two Presidents of the union Chrysler
division to ask him what everything meant. Of course many were glad he was
retiring because they hated him and his arrogant and demanding ways.
Yet, virtually all of these folks have an acute and profound understanding
of the feelings of the membership and intimately understand how the workers
think things out.
I asked "what the story with Obama?"
Several of them - mostly black, and in the case of the white reps all of
them, repeatedly stated that Obama was going to win everything because a clear
majority of white workers in the plants, concentrated amongst the skilled
workers in particular, were openly siding with Obama. The skilled workers
generally carried the unskilled in their wake due to their superior organization,
greater literacy and compactness.
Still . . . I did not believe Obama, a black guy with an Arabic/African
name could win President of the United States of America. I privately pondered
what a vote for Hillary Clinton would mean to myself; not the working class
as a whole, that happens not to vote at all. I understood - I mean really
understood, these guys and dolls are extremely accurate in their gage of the
pulse, mood and striving of the organized - trade union, section of the working
class and what this meant. Generally, where every the organized section of
the labor movement went, the vast majority that constitute the meaning of
"labor' must follow due to their lack of organization and a coherent voice. The
labor movement is spontaneous and unarticulated masses; all those who must sell
their labor for wages. The union is the organized (trade union) section of
the labor movement. One confuses the one with the other at their own peril.
Voting America is likewise one section of the working class, with the majority
perpetually revolving outside the electoral arena.
I danced, shook hands, pressed flesh and as the evening progressed proposed
marriage to two or three women.
Still, I could not make myself believe a black man - name Obama, which
rhymes with "your momma," could win President.
Likening the action of the voting section of the working class to the
revolutionary memory of John Brown, who with arms in hand attack outpost of
slavery, under the concept of "anti-racism" seems like some kind of blasphemy. Yet,
there is no denying that millions came out in rallies and celebrations of
the Obama victory.
What?
Is one suppose to liken Obama election to the election of Lincoln and then
the emancipatory actions of Lincoln.
Pleaseeeeeeeeessse.
Not withstanding his detractors on the left and right, Lincoln did in fact
speak out early against slavery during his campaign and then . . . . then, was
driven by social forces unleashed with the South or rather most of the
Southern states, leaving the Union establishing the Confederate States of
America. This act - (dissolving the Union), in turn caused a profound realignment
of social forces in America and also created the conditions for sharpening of
the internal class struggle within the CSA. The Civil War is and remains the
only blueprint for class intersection available to communists historians and
remains the starting point frame of reference in discussing real life class
interactions. None of this history can be gleamed from Lenin. Some from Marx
and Engels letters.
Studying American history had informed me that huge segments of the
Southern white population hated the Slave Oligarchy and one should not lump all
white people together.
There is something unsettling about likening the election of Obama to John
Brown. .
Yet, Obama election is a profound step in the voting section of the working
class proving to all segments of American society that the color factor in
our history is being further annihilated. This annihilation happens to
coincide with, and collapse into a general shift in official American ideology.
Class intersection and policy shifts is the watchword.
For all of our lives official American policy and ideology was a complex of
extremely aggression anti-communism wedded to white chauvinism. With the
collapse of Soviet Power an ideological and policy shift began under the CIA's
public spokesperson Bush 1. This shift was completed was completed by Clinton
and then remastered - like a recording, by Bush W. as an expanded version of
Clinton's war against terrorism.
White chauvinism as official ideology was delivered a series of death
strokes with the overthrow of Jim Crow. Jim Crow is not the meaning of white
chauvinism. White chauvinism was the modern rationale for Jim Crow.
Actually, the voting white workers did in fact close a chapter in our
history with the crossing of the color line, which Dubois predicted would remain
the paramount question in 20th century America. There is no one single reason
for the closing of a chapter of our history, only class intersection.
This crossing of the color line means different things to different people
and different classes. Not in the subjective sense of each "individual head"
having a distinct personality and opinion. For the black bourgeoisie, (the
real black bourgeoisie rather than the petty bourgeoisie or intelligentsia that
is black), it means the sky is the limit. For a generation of black leaders
carrying the burden of a long and tortured history, Obama means their role as
"black leaders," leaders of black people has ended.
Yea, there will be leaders of different gender and colors, but that peculiar
phenomenon of the black leader, a product of Jim Crow has come to an abrupt
end.
Here is a story all communists and Marxists in America should know. White
supremacy still exists and there is much of it still poisoning the political
landscape. What has been wiped from history is Jim Crow. The material step
taken by the voting section of the working class, crossing the color line, is
one of the landmarks in American history that will live forever, but hardly a
sign of proletarian internationalism. Proletarian internationalism today means
the unity of the fighting section of the workers in their battle against
capital.
Emancipation. Obama of course, promised no one emancipation.
I am glad to be a part of the voting section of the workers crossing this
line. Crossing this line in the current political environment of America does
mean the opening a of opportunity for communists to openly champion our
views.
This also means an increase in danger in the form of the fascist movement.
If anything I liken the crossing of the color line, at this moment in time,
to the historically specific alignment - intersection, of class forces that
existed during the growth of the original Populist Movement in America. An
intersection of class forces, with the middle class in the lead, ushered
Obama into office.
All such non-class movements possess the danger of being co-opted by the
fascist movement. Non-class movement means an intersection of classes, in
motion, that lacks an awareness that the working class fight is to be able to write
the economic and political agenda for the entire country. Moving into the
1890's, at a higher level is the historical likening I see, with the last period
roughly mirroring 1865 - 1880. Roughly.
This time the fascist movement has no need for the ideology of white
supremacy.
WL.
In a message dated 2/2/2009 6:45:31 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
__cdb1003 at prodigy.net_ (mailto:_cdb1003 at prodigy.net) _ (_mailto:cdb1003 at prodigy.net_
(mailto:cdb1003 at prodigy.net) ) writes: The history made in O's election was not
made by Obama, and it was not made by Black people. It was made by the
masses ( although minority) of White working people who voted for Obama. The
majority of white people did not vote for Obama, but the minority who voted for
him was critical to victory. More White people voted for Obama than Black
people. There were appeals to racism made by the Republicans and
rightwingers in the election. The sufficiently large White vote for Obama amounts to a
historic repudiation of this racism , and the larger racist legacy of
American history. If Obama had lost, I would have been attributing it to racism.
Since he won, I have got to say "it" was anti-racism. The division of the US
working class by racism is the main division of it. The history in the
election of Obama is especially that masses of White working class people voted
for a Black candidate for President. Glory to the White American anti-racist
spirit and sentiment. John Brown's soul is marching on !
Charles
**************Stay up to date on the latest news - from sports scores to
stocks and so much more. (http://aol.com?ncid=emlcntaolcom00000022)
More information about the Marxism
mailing list