[Marxism] Still decoupled - so far (1)
S. Artesian
sartesian at earthlink.net
Mon Sep 1 07:38:29 MDT 2008
It appears that "decoupling" here comes down to the belief that the BRIC
economies will "weather the storm." Hell, I expect the developed economies
will weather the storm, too.
The real question is coupled or decoupled can the BRIC capitalist economies
avoid the "storms" generated by their economic contradictions and the
linkage of those contradictions through the world markets to the problems of
advanced capitalism?
In that regard we should keep several things in mind: 1. agricultural
productivity-- which is quite low, and in some countries, particularly
India, has been worsening for about 5 years 2. slower growth in
manufacturing employment-- according to China's National Bureau of
Statistics, manufacturing employment actually peaked in 1995 and then
declined through 2002 (last year for which statistics are published). Hindu
Business Online, in April 2007, published a study which showed continued
decline in manufacturing employment. 3. The abundant foreign exchange
reserves of the BRIC countries are actually an index to a dangerous mix of
"underdevelopment" and overproduction, as the the lack of agricultural
productivity, infrastructure stability, and the reduced domestic market
combine to constrain profitable capital investment, or at least investment
that can keep up with cash flows, revenues, export earnings, and labor force
expansion/urban migration. Cash is trash, sometimes.4. Yes, their foreign
trade with each other is expanding, and is still significantly below trade
with their advanced capitalist customers/suppliers. 5. I think it's wishful
thinking, and a misplaced wish at that, to argue that China and the other
new big economies will help stave off global depression. If there is
economic contraction deep enough to warrant the term "depression" in the US,
the EU, and Japan, then China and the BRI will lose their export markets,
their sources of FDI, and their links up the value chain. Then their
internal economic, social contradictions will overwhelm their capitalist
development, just as occurs in the rest of the capitalist world.
One more comment on "decoupling," the term was/is also used to describe the
"coming" EU parity with, and independence from, US economic strength. The
very same Finanical Times had an article last week talking about the end of
that part of the "decoupling" myth, and indeed its reversal.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Marvin Gandall" <marvgandall at videotron.ca>
To: <sartesian at earthlink.net>
Sent: Monday, September 01, 2008 9:10 AM
Subject: [Marxism] Still decoupled - so far (1)
Although the report below states that "hopes that emerging markets could
power ahead regardless – a theory known as decoupling – now look misguided",
the evidence it presents suggests otherwise:
1. Demand for commodities is still strong in China and other rapidly
industrializing nations outside the core OECD countries; 2. The BRIC's, in
particular, have abundant foreign exchange reserves; 3. their banks have
limited exposure to the bad debt plaguing their American and European
counterparts, and 4. a steadily growing percentage of their foreign trade
is with each other, easing their dependence on the advanced capitalist
countries. While some smaller, heavily-indebted and highly export-dependent
countries could be pulled under by the financial crisis and economic
downturn in the West, indications are that China and the other big new
economies should stay afloat and help stave off a global depression.
More information about the Marxism
mailing list