[Marxism] What about "naked shorts"?
Aaron Aarons
aaron at mylists.fastmail.fm
Tue Oct 7 02:50:40 MDT 2008
>From: Shane Mage <shmage at pipeline.com>
>Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 00:54:59 -0400
>
>On Oct 6, 2008, at 11:24 PM, Aaron Aarons wrote:
>
>> I came across this web site:
>>
>> <http://www.deepcapture.com/>
>>
>> that argues that massive fraudulent short-selling of their stocks --
>> "naked shorts" -- is what brought down American International Group,
>> Goldman Sachs, Lehman Brothers, Morgan Stanley, Washington Mutual,
>> and Merrill Lynch.
>>
>> Do any of the economists on this list have any ideas about this?
>
>Why "fraudulent?" An uncovered short-seller has to put up just as much
>margin as a fully leveraged buyer. The only fraud would be if seller--
>or buyer--were permitted to evade margin regulations.
More information about the Marxism
mailing list