[Marxism] If you want to identify the ruling class, you have to decide what is a social class.
Jim Farmelant
farmelantj at juno.com
Sun Nov 2 09:03:05 MST 2008
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 21:37:50 -0700 "johnaimani" <johnaimani at earthlink.net>
writes:
> Ask any 'Marxist' how is it that class is determined and she/he will
> no doubt aver "Class is determined by ones relationship to the means
> of production". Ask them what that means and they can't tell you.
> These is a scientific analysis of class and that is that class is
> determined by the value-composition of the product one sells.
>
> The constituents of value are c + v + s.
>
> Now c + v, in the hands of the capitalist, equal C (for Capital that
> can be used to purchase constant (c) and varariable (v) capitals).
>
> And v + s, when controlled by the worker, equal l (for the full
> value of the labor of the worker.).
>
> We are then led to this formulation of the classes:
>
> Working Classes
>
> Wage-worker - v (the wage worker has only hir's labor-power (v)
> to sell)
>
> Independent worker - c + l (the IW must have hir's own means of
> production (c) and owns the full value of hir's labor (l)
>
> Petit-Bourgeois - (c + l) + (v + s) (the PB owns the constant
> capital hir uses (c) and hir's own labor (l) + purchase the
> labor-power of hir's workers (v) and owns the surplus
> produced by the worker (s))
>
Where do so-called "unproductive" workers fit in this scheme
(for example retail workers, workers in finance, advertising etc?
As I understand it, their labor does not add to the value produced,
so they are in effect paid out of surplus value. But they are certainly
not capitalists.
> Capitalist Classes
>
> Petit-Bourgeois - (c + l) + (v + s) (the PB owns the constant
> capital hir uses (c) and hir's own labor (l) + purchase the
> labor-power of hir's workers (v) and owns the
> surplus produced by the worker (s))
>
> Capitalist - C
>
> Industrial - (Cp) where p stands for enterprise profit
> Rent - (Cg) where g stands for ground-rent
> Financial - (Ci) where i stands for interest
>
> It will be noted above that the PB lies in both classes, or rather
> is a hybrid of both classes. This is so because hir's own labor (l)
> is necessary to maintain hir (i.e. hir can neither maintain hir's
> position solely by hir's own work (in that case hir would be an IW);
> nor can hir maintain that position solely by exploiting wage-labor
> (in that case hir would be a capitalist).
>>
____________________________________________________________
Are you safe? Click for quotes on a home security system.
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL2141/fc/Ioyw6i3ni3cplg4jppllcH8wgdhQPmnkTzq9prcChFci1FO3Sypiaj/
More information about the Marxism
mailing list