[Marxism] Moderator's note
David Thorstad
binesi at gvtel.com
Sat Nov 1 13:55:03 MDT 2008
Louis asked me to show where Fred Feldman and Walter Lippman had
compared me to a Nazi, as I asserted in a post.
Here is Fred Feldman's post of October 13, comparing me to Julius
Streicher, publisher of /Der Stürmer/. (I apologize for misremembering
that his comparison was a reaction to my post about Obama's alleged
salacious "sex perv" connections, and not same-sex marriage.) I let it
go at the time as a mere snotty excess. But since I'm being smacked for
less egregious sins--pointing out the liberal reformism of people like
Feldman and Lippmann who see no problem in Marxists voting for Obama--I
cite it again.
So much for Feldman's comparing me to a Nazi, even if it is a "left"
one. As for Lippmann, I could be wrong about my assertion that he too
compared me to a Nazi in our personal exchanges (part of which he posted
on the list), and since I don't save or copy many exchanges, I am ready
to concede that my assertion was inaccurate, since I haven't saved the
exchanges we had so can't prove it. That said, Walter did resort to name
calling, repeatedly referring to me there and on the list as a
"thoroughgoing reactionary." During our exchanges, I went back and read
one of his lengthy internal SWP discussion bulletin contributions from
1979 in which he stated--already then--nearly thirty years ago, that I
was a "reactionary." At least he's consistent. I suspect both he and
Feldman supported Barry Sheppard's wretched "Memorandum" on gay
liberation in 1973, which Barry has written in his memoir was written to
accommodate prejudice against homosexuals as a result of prodding from
Farrell Dobbs (something that was kept secret from the ranks at the
time--so much for "proletarian democracy," which in this case resembles
Stalinism more than socialist democracy). Kudos to them if they did not,
but am I wrong?
Another rather bizarre attempt to link me to racism (!) and the
right came from Jeff (Oct. 27) in his comments on "Why Gay Marriage
Sucks," in which, reacting to my opposition to "hate-crimes"
legislation, he stated:
"So to summarize, you are AGAINST legislation which is AGAINST
racist violence. [huh? This was about Wyoming antigay "hate crimes"
legislation, and had nothing to do with racist violence] And that puts
you exactly where in the struggle against racism? Yes, WE know that
you're a Marxist etc. But are you going to go out canvassing with
Klansman [sic] by your side? Knock on doors and explain that the guy in
the white robe next to you supports your position "for the worng
reason?" To me, this is another oddball argument that goes well beyond
my comment that leftist Obama supporters are liberals, not Marxists.
Addressing the arguments of those one does not see eye to eye with,
rather than labeling them with loaded terms that turn them into the
Other, would seem advisable. The tendency of some (Feldman, Lippmann...)
to resort to self-serving labeling instead reminds me of some of the
internal SWP discussions I witnessed, in which comrades eager to get in
good with the leadership resorted to the same kind of demonizing. And
look where that outfit they defended at the time ended up.
David
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
David Thorstad:
I see no reason not to publicize any of this,
nor do I feel any need to defend a capitalist politician from such
revelations, most especially since I have no information that they are not
true.
Fred comments:
Well if the revolutionary left ever "needs" its own "Der Sturmer," Thorstad
is clearly the one to provide it. The times may yet find the man.
That's it from me on this political pornography, at least until
consequences, if any, start coming in.
Fred Feldman
More information about the Marxism
mailing list