[Marxism] Stating obvious, SADC says Zimbabwe vote not will of people
Jscotlive at aol.com
Jscotlive at aol.com
Tue Jul 1 01:09:45 MDT 2008
Patrick:
Simplistic does not mean wrong, it means insufficient. Of course
imperialism bears responsibility for putting unbearable pressure on Zim
and other African societies, and I can send you a million words or more
I've penned to document this. But it doesn't mean you can leave out (as
do so many Mugabe-fronters) the compradorisation and neoliberal
restructuring of the Zim economy that Mugabe and his cronies embraced,
until repayment of WB/IMF debt became impossible in 1999.
Reply:
Agreed and exactly the point I make in my original piece:
'In short, Mugabe's real crime was not one committed against the white
privileged minority with land expropriations, it was the crime committed against
the Zimbabwean people back in 1980 with the passing of control of Zimbabwe's
economy to the IMF and the World Bank, thus ensuring the continuance of a
legacy of exploitation and pillage begun by Cecil Rhodes in the 19th century, and
subsequently carried on with vigor by successive British governments
thereafter'
It seems that you feel we should be focusing our ire on Mugabe and his
regime, which is the symptom of a generation of neoliberalism and imperialism
which has ravaged that entire continent. In this I disagree with you. Yes, Mugabe
has decided to remain in power regardless of the cost to the vast majority
of the people of his country, and yes he has lost legitimacy as a result, but
that in no way diminished the fact that this crisis has its roots in
structural readjustment emanating from Washington DC through the agency of the IMF
and World Bank.
More information about the Marxism
mailing list