[Marxism] The relentless and obsessive opposition to
dave.walters at comcast.net
dave.walters at comcast.net
Wed Apr 2 08:29:15 MDT 2008
I appreciate Fred's comments, most of which,
I think, I agree with.
There are several parts to this discussion. Assuming
HERE we are discussing this among people who
do not call for a vote for Obama (I state this because
I haven't read all the threads on this), then the most
important aspect of this discussion is how to approach
Obama *supporters* among the Black community. I
agree 100% that just slamming him is useless and
destructive. It essentially ends the discussion before
it starts. I'm not talking about discussing this among
radical Black *activists *, but among regular folks
who are inspired about the possibility of America
having a Black President and among Black Democratic
Party activists who are the kind of people who have
started going to precinct meetings, doing phone-trees for
Obama, etc.
I would take the same approach some of us did with the
obviously more radical sounding Jesse Jackson surge of
1984, which is to talk politics and discuss with them their
concerns, issues, etc in an informal manner we do on the
job or among our friends. It is NOT a big deal in this
regard. It's simply called "respect", respect for people
who have for very good reasons, got excited about
Obama possible getting the nomination and winning in
November. As part of this respect, one has to be honest
and state clearly and reasonably the problems with
Obama's politics, not to turn people off from Obama,
but on the problems of problem-solving-by-electing-
a-President as a substitute for building a mass movement
around real issues. If one can't do this, then one should
figure out other things to do with their lives. It is simply
not a question of attacking Obama the person.
I think among the more radical layers of Black activists,
it is different. There is a lot or resentment toward NOT
Obama but among Black leaders that have become
Obama supporters. In this sense, the Glen Ford/BAR is
VERY much appropriate because of the audience the
BAR is aiming at. I think Fred misses the point here:
politics among this narrow, but important layer, is at a
much higher level
and I do think it's higher, than
among the population as a whole. I would defend the
BAR's perspective because of who they are who they
are talking to. I don't have a problem at all.
I posted here Ford's analysis a few months ago about
Obama. I think he told the truth and, someone has to
tell the truth and I'm glad BAR did so. It was something
that needed to be said among Black radicals. Self-suppression
of the truth turns can easily turn into the kind of unquestioning
attitude that Jackson tried to promote in the Rainbow
Coalition. The BAR is a modifier to this sort of homogenization
that can occur when a populalist bourgeois politician is on a
roll.
I also like Cynthia McKinney's statement on the Obama
speech, which has a lot of talking points and I think was
expressed from the point of view of a person with a large
Black constituency yet who has a visceral * hatred * of the
Democratic Party.
David
More information about the Marxism
mailing list