[Marxism] Theory of Violence
Greg McDonald
sabocat59 at mac.com
Sat Sep 1 07:09:44 MDT 2007
Owen Davies argues that politics leads to violence. Obviously,
therefore, less politics means "less, possibly no violence".
I was offering Fromm as a useful source to support part of your
argument, and to make it more nuanced. Fromm argued against the
Freudian view of a universal aggressive tendency as part of human
psychology. He examined the ethnographic record to support his
argument. I like Fromm's book because it takes the anthropological
record seriously. He draws from Quincy Wright's 1,600 page analysis
of warfare among our forebears, which examined 653 different
cultures. Fromm then used Wright's conclusions as a benchmark in his
reading of other ethnographies which he consulted. He found
commonality on the following conclusion: "The collectors, lower
hunters and lower agriculturalists are the least warlike. The higher
hunters and higher agriculturalists are more warlike, while the
highest agriculturalists and the pastoral cultures are the most
warlike of all" (Wright, Q. 1965. " A Study of War").
Fromm comments on Wright's data: "the more division of labor there
is in a society, the more warlike it is, and that societies with
class systems are the most warlike of all peoples. Eventually his
data show that the greater the equilibrium among groups and between
the group and its physical environment, the less warlikeness one
finds, while frequent disturbances in the equilibrium result in an
increase in warlikeness. Wright distinguishes among four kinds of
war--defensive, social, economic, and political." According to Fromm,
Wright's research "confirms the thesis that the most primitive are
the least warlike and that warlikeness grows in proportion to
civilization".
The Political is just one cause among many for warfare in primitive
cultures. That was my point. But the overall analysis supports your
argument.
And yes, Fromm was associated with the Frankfurt School.
Greg
More information about the Marxism
mailing list