[Marxism] "Anti-Communist" cooties
Eli Stephens
elishastephens at hotmail.com
Wed Nov 21 20:40:59 MST 2007
Joaquin writes about the ISO: "Unlike some (a few) comrades
who were taken in by the Landy statement against Cuba, they saw right
through it."
Louis linked on an earlier thread to the article in which they discuss the subject:
http://www.socialistworker.org/2003-1/453/453_05_Cuba.shtml
There may well be other evidence, but based on that article, describing the ISO
as "seeing right through" the Landy statement is a stretch, to put it mildly. As
an interested reader, I'm unable at this date to read the article and discern a
clear stance one way or the other. There certainly is no flat out rejection or
endorsement of EITHER of the two letters in that article. Certainly one can draw
inferences, as I wrote earlier, but "seeing right through"? Hardly.
In August, 2003, Cuban Five political prison Rene Gonzalez wrote a stirring
response to that letter, addressed to Joanne Landy, mentioned in my blog here:
http://lefti.blogspot.com/2003_08_01_archive.html#106028990078760221
Workers World reprinted much of the letter here:
http://www.workers.org/ww/2003/renelet0821.php
Fidel Castro also wrote a length piece at the time (not in direct response to
the Landy letter but indirectly in response to the whole event), which is here:
http://www.cuba.cu/gobierno/discursos/2003/ing/f250403i.html
Neither of those two important documents was, or ever has been, mentioned by the
ISO. In addition, I note that the article in SW which addresses the question
poses the issue as a "crackdown on dissidents."
I think I may have to take back what I said. Calling that "seeing right through"
the Landy statement isn't just a stretch, it's nonsense.
_________________________________________________________________
Put your friends on the big screen with Windows Vista® + Windows Live™.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/shop/specialoffers.mspx?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_CPC_MediaCtr_bigscreen_102007
More information about the Marxism
mailing list