[Marxism] Respect split
Jscotlive at aol.com
Jscotlive at aol.com
Thu Nov 1 04:15:31 MDT 2007
Lenin's Tomb:
You don't recall this at all, since it is false: you invent it. The SWP was
involved in the non-payment committees and in organising the mass
demonstrations, and it isn't hard to find SWP members in the riots either.
Reply:
I'm sorry, but this is revisionism. The SWP at the time did not get involved
in the anti-Poll Tax campaign because they did not believe that struggle
emanating from local communities had the potential to provide unified and
meaningful opposition to Thatcher. They had turned to industrial work in the wake
of the Miner's Strike and were focusing on that. Militant Tendency, in
conjunction with independent activists, were the main driving force behind the
anti-Poll Tax campaign. SWPers may have been involved in an individual capacity,
but certainly not as an organised block. They shed members over this.
Again, it is important to understand how this crisis within Respect is
damaging the SWP. This turn to revolutionary purity is a massive blunder, as it
will alienate large sections of the class and render the possibility of anyone
working with the SWP again nil and void. They are in danger of becoming that
which they have always feared most - a sect - and untouchable to boot. Daphne
Lawless in her letter is absolutely right, you have to meet the class
halfway. The revolution is not around the corner in today's Britain, nor will it
begin if only you manage to hand out 20 more leaflets or sell more newspapers.
This could have serious repercussions for the antiwar movement if it goes
on. A split is now inevitable. How it is handled is absolutely crucial for the
future prospects of the SWP.
More information about the Marxism
mailing list