[Marxism] NY Times still not convinced of US-Iran "common interests" in "Quisling regime" in Iraq

[Nestor Gorojovsky]

From:           	"Paula" <Paula_cerni en msn.com>
To:             	"Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition" 
<marxism en lists.econ.utah.edu>
Date sent:      	Tue, 3 Jul 2007 03:03:45 -0700
Send reply to:  	Activists and scholars in Marxist tradition
	<marxism en lists.econ.utah.edu>
Subject:        	Re: [Marxism] NY Times still not convinced of US-
Iran "common
	interests" in "Quisling regime" in Iraq

> I would add that today's world is easier to understand if we
> stop thinking that every developing nation is, automatically, an oppressed
> victim of US/Western imperialism.

Imperialism is an objective structure. The divide does not lie 
between "developed" and "developing" countries (not always "nations", 
please let us be Marxists, not every country is a nation). The divide 
still runs between those nations, all imperialist, which enjoy a self-
centered capitalism, and those which suffer from an extrovert 
capitalism.

Of course many countries, from time to time and under the 
guidance/rule/domination of most different classes running usually as 
the head of a front of classes, try to overcome the divide (always in 
the extrovert economies, never in the self-centered ones). The 
results of the different attempts tends to accumulate but every 
failure (and short of socialism, failures are 99,99% certain) implies 
a restoration of imperialist rule in full.

If we get the thing wrong on this, then we lose all our bearings.

Este correo lo ha enviado
Néstor Miguel Gorojovsky
nestorgoro en fibertel.com.ar
[No necesariamente es su autor]
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 
"La patria tiene que ser la dignidad arriba y el regocijo abajo".
Aparicio Saravia
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _