[A-List] Fwd: [R-G] [BillTottenWeblog] Western media play along in the disinformation game

Suzanne de Kuyper suzannedk at gmail.com
Sat Jun 26 01:49:52 MDT 2010


As Western foreign policy agreements and legalized decisions are made
based on generations of dis-information, coming clean does not presnt
an option to do so.  The Gulf 'Spill' actually an voclanic eruption of
virgin oil from the drilled source of an undersea tetonic plate has
been lied about since it began two months ago.  The amount of the
daily eruption, the size of the originating oil cache, the release of
methane gas, the fracturing of the shell of primal rock that once kept
the oil in one place.  Then the exact information of the release of
chemicals to disperse the oil, chemicals banned in other countries as
deadly poisonous,  their chemical ingredients, what is the effect of
each ingredient on life forms, their combined effect on life forms,
the mix of virgin crude oil plus chemicals producing what combined
reaction on life forms, what is their longterm chemical life
expectancies?

Then the media should be focusing on the hiding of the information
being withheld of the spead of the oil plus the increasing use of the
poisonous chemicals now entering the wide ranging Gulf Stream.  The
Gulf Stream warms the UK in winter, leads into the North Sea which has
many bordering countries directly affected by it, all the way to
Russia.  Just as the fishing grounds of the Gulf of Mexico may be
totally or mostly destroyed, such could easily happen to the Nordic
countries, the UK countries, our fisheries gone.

US War Corporation Empire Law would not allow such information out,
which is why one does not read it as necessary news.  Maybe a time to
consider sanctioning the U.S..   A natural boycott of US news is well
under way here in Europe.  We turn away. Is not enough.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Bill Totten <shimogamo at ashisuto.co.jp>
Date: Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:47 AM
Subject: [R-G] [BillTottenWeblog] Western media play along in the
disinformation game
To: Suzanne  de Kuyper <suzannedk at gmail.com>


by Gregory Clark

The Japan Times (June 25 2010)


Are they being manipulated by governments? Or, are they just plain lazy,
happy to go along with what everyone else is saying and what readers want
to believe without wanting to look too closely into relevant background?

I refer to the way the Western media, both lately and in the past, have
accepted blatant and often dangerous news distortions.

The Number One distortion remains the so-called massacre at Tiananmen
Square. On the 21st anniversary of that alleged event earlier this month,
the main news agencies still managed to preserve the fiction of Chinese
troops marching into Beijing's iconic square and shooting down innocent
students in the hundreds, if not thousands. This, despite all the reliable
eyewitness reports, available on Google, that say almost nothing occurred
in the square on the night of June 3-4 1989.

What happened was quite different: There was wild shooting on roads
leading to the square by soldiers retaliating for vicious firebomb attacks
by angry citizens on units sent to remove protesting students who had been
allowed to occupy the square for weeks while regime moderates tried vainly
to negotiate the reforms the students wanted. Many died as a result,
including soldiers incinerated in their trucks and other vehicles.

But never mind the facts. The fantasy story makes for much better reading.
It also gave the European nations an excuse to blacklist China for arms
sales and even for the riot control equipment that might have prevented
the mayhem.

A detailed 1998 study in the Columbia Journalism Review titled "Reporting
the Myth of Tiananmen, and the Price of a Passive Press", by Jay Mathews,
Washington Post former bureau chief in Beijing (also available on Google)
traces the massacre myth to a front-page story in Hong Kong that was
flashed quickly around the world as fact by news agencies. My not
uninformed guess says it was probably planted by either Western or
Taiwanese intelligence agencies. The alleged author has never been found.

Closer to home, we have the reports of the March torpedo attack on a South
Korean warship, killing 46 seamen. Western media blasting North Korea for
the attack make little or no mention of the fact that it was in disputed
waters and that, if caused by North Korea, it would almost certainly have
been retaliation for a November 2009 South Korean attack on a North Korean
patrol boat in the same area, also with casualties.

Even less mention is made of the fact that the waters are disputed because
of an arbitrary line drawn by the United States under the 1953 Korean War
armistice. Determining the correct line would be a key item in the peace
agreement that North Korea wants but that the US has delayed, hoping for
regime collapse in the North.

There are even doubts whether there was an attack. Sweden, the only
neutral member in an international group investigating the affair,
withdrew from the final report (see the article by John McGlynn {*} in the
June 7 Asia-Pacific Journal). Two other possible causes for the sinking
have been put forward, but little of this finds mention in Western media,
where calls for strong retaliation and UN condemnation against North Korea
wax large.

{*} http://www.japanfocus.org/-John-McGlynn/3372

It's a similar story with regard to the media fuss over Chinese naval
activity in the East China Sea. China has a not-invalid claim to a large
Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) in the East China sea even if it conflicts
with Japan's median line claim.

China can hardly be expected to remain immobile while Japan acts as if its
own claim is set in stone, especially since Beijing, unlike Tokyo, seeks a
compromise joint development agreement between the rival claims.

The western Pacific coral reef of Okinotorishima presents a similar
dilemma for Beijing. China does not dispute Japan's ownership of the reef.
But it could hardly remain silent after the Japanese military earlier this
year landed troops on the reef in a bid to support Tokyo's claim for an
encircling 400,000-square-kilometer EEZ - a claim that contradicts
international law, which states that rocks unable to sustain economic
activity cannot have an EEZ.

But one would have to look hard for any mention of these crucial details
in the Western media, where increasingly China is portrayed as
expansionist and a future military threat.

Many Japanese media were happy to use the biased versions of these
incidents to accuse the Hatoyama administration of ignoring Chinese and
North Korean threats, and to pressure it into agreeing to the relocation
of a US Marine base to Henoko, Okinawa.

Can't we have an end to this kind of media bias? Media acceptance of Cold
War disinformation operations by both sides cost millions of lives and
decades of stunted economic growth. Working in Canberra during those
years, I saw close up how slanted material from allegedly impartial
academics and think tanks was pushed into the media, and used. Western
disinformation efforts during the Kosovo and Iraq wars were equally
harmful.

With South Ossetia, we had the remarkable sight of the main US and UK
media telling us that Russia had attacked Georgia when it was almost the
complete opposite - a claim that could easily have led to a revived Cold
War.

Even worse was the 1962 claim that China had attacked India when in it was
the complete opposite - a false claim that indirectly led to the Vietnam
War.

Today, over Iran, we have a similar media disinformation war under way,
financed in part by CIA funds, reported American award-winning commentator
Seymour Hersh in 2008. Maybe it's time for the media to clean up their act
a bit.

_____

Gregory Clark is a former Australian diplomat and a longtime resident in
Japan working as a correspondent and in a variety of university positions.

(C) All rights reserved

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/rss/eo20100625gc.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+japantimes_news+%28The+Japan+Times+Headline+News+-+News+%26+Business%29&utm_content=My+Yahoo

TO POST A COMMENT, OR TO READ COMMENTS POSTED BY OTHERS, please click
on the word "comment" highlighted at the end of the version of this
essay posted at http://billtotten.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
Rad-Green mailing list
Rad-Green at lists.econ.utah.edu
To change your options or unsubscribe go to:
http://lists.econ.utah.edu/mailman/listinfo/rad-green




More information about the A-List mailing list