[A-List] The Korean Crisis: Cui Bono

[Todd Boyle]

But of course.  It was somebody's intention to escalate the tensions.

There is a vast inventory of other psychopathic stunts that have not 
been done, and which the neocons, jihadists, etc. have on their 
"To-Do" lists.   Blow up mecca, shoot the pope, nuke the congress, 
etc.    Wall Street has their own list.  Blowup your 401K, sink the 
dollar, shutoff the money supply, force an oil crisis, etc.

They have so many stunts, Naomi Klein has figured it out exactly 
right--- the answer is keep your ship pointed in the direction you 
originally intended-- steady as she goes--- and we win, in the 
end.   By seeing past our fears, and using these stunts to identify 
the perpetrators, and tighten the screws on them, another notch.

Todd

At 04:02 PM 6/1/2010, Bill Totten wrote:
>The alleged North Korean sinking of a South Korean boat has dramatically
>escalated tensions between North and South Korea
>
>by F William Engdahl
>
>Global Research (May 31 2010)
>
>
>The alleged North Korean sinking of a South Korean boat in March has
>dramatically escalated tensions between north and south Korea. It has also
>caused a reversal of a planned Japanese government push to close the US
>military base on Okinawa. The major question in the bizarre affair is Cui
>Bono?
>
>On March 26, a 1,200-ton Cheonan corvette was sunk apparently by a
>torpedo. Forty-six sailors died when the ship went down near the disputed
>Northern Limit Line (NLL) in the Yellow Sea following a sudden explosion.
>On May 26, a special investigative commission of South Korean military and
>unnamed experts from the US, Canada, Britain, and Sweden, issued their
>report stating that, "Cheonan was sunk as the result of an external
>underwater explosion caused by a torpedo made in North Korea. The evidence
>points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that the torpedo was fired by a
>North Korean submarine."
>
>
>That report has detonated an explosive rise in tensions in the entire
>Korean Peninsula and beyond to Japan. It has involved the Chinese and
>Russians in efforts at defusing the crisis. It also comes at an extremely
>convenient moment for the Pentagon. North Korea vehemently denies that it
>fired the torpedo and has accused Washington of provoking the clash. North
>Korea, angered by the accusations, has declared it is cutting all ties
>with Seoul and allegedly has ordered its 1.2 million armed forces to get
>ready for combat.
>
>The United States and South Korea will hold joint military drills to
>practice interception of submarines "in the near future", a Pentagon
>spokesman has stated, calling the maneuvers "a result of the findings of
>this recent incident". The Obama Administration has said Pyongyang should
>face consequences and expressed its "unequivocal" support to South Korea.
>Obama has directed his military commanders to coordinate with South Korea
>to "ensure readiness" and "deter future aggression".
>
>Curious proof
>
>The key piece of evidence cited by the anonymous commission is a fragment
>of a torpedo propeller - somehow recovered at the final phase of the
>investigation - with a marking which reads "Number 1" and matches a North
>Korean torpedo found seven years ago in the Yellow Sea, according to
>Alexander Vorontsov, Head of Korea Department of the Institute for
>Oriental studies of the Russian Academy of Science. He adds, "Considering
>that the blast was allegedly caused by a torpedo carrying a net explosive
>weight of 250 kilograms, investigators must have been remarkably lucky to
>find the right fragment with the marking implicating North Korea. The
>marking, which is the sole indication of the country of origin of the
>torpedo, could of course look exactly the same on a South Korean
>torpedo." {1}
>
>The Obama White House has rushed to endorse the Commission report. The
>White House condemned "the act of aggression" in a statement made
>available almost immediately on release of the report. Even before the
>report was released, Obama talked to South Korean President Lee Myung-bak
>by phone and reportedly told Lee that all contacts with North Korea should
>be suspended until it becomes clear who perpetrated the attack, not
>exactly a calming move.
>
>Japan, whose new Government had won election on a pledge to close the
>controversial US Naval base on Okinawa, suddenly capitulated and agreed
>with Washington to "settle" the dispute, citing the Korean crisis as
>grounds. Japan and the United States have now come to an agreement on the
>relocation of the US military base in Okinawa. Japanese Defense Minister
>Toshimi Kitazawa and US Defense Secretary Robert Gates met at the Pentagon
>the same day the Korean commission issued its "findings".
>
>To date both the Russian and Chinese governments have reacted extremely
>cautiously to the Seoul claims. Russian foreign minister Lavrov has stated
>that Moscow would carefully review pertinent materials, both those from
>South Korea and "from other sources". He made clear that Moscow had
>reservations about the South Korean version of the incident and deemed
>further verification necessary. Lavrov also urged restraint on both sides,
>a stark contrast to the Obama Administration.
>
>China's position is generally similar. China's foreign ministry spokesman
>described the sinking of Cheonan as a tragic incident and stated that the
>priority in dealing with it should be to sustain peace and stability on
>the Korean Peninsula and in the entire North East Asia. Beijing is calling
>for calm and restraint until it transpires what exactly happened.
>Unofficially, China criticizes the evidence at South Korea's disposal as
>unconvincing, patchy, and contradictory and says it is going to assess the
>situation independently.
>
>North Korea insists that the evidence was forged and is ready to send its
>inspectors to assess it. Pyongyang is offering to delegate representatives
>to review South Korea's "evidence", a timely and rational initiative
>intended to keep the inter-Korean dialog afloat during the crisis and help
>defuse the conflict. South Korea's refusal to enter talks with Pyongyang
>would further diminish the credibility of their evidence.
>
>In addition to the dispute over the status of the key US base on Okinawa
>in Japan, the US is under pressure to end its military command in South
>Korea and turn it over to the South Koreans in 2012. The US has 28,000
>troops on the peninsula. In line with an agreement reached after the end
>of the 1950s Korean war, South Korean soldiers follow US military orders
>in case of war on the Korean Peninsula. The latest incident comes as North
>Korea appeared ready to resume the six-party talks on North Korea's
>nuclear program, involving Russia, Japan, China, the United States and the
>two Koreas, stalled in April 2009 when Pyongyang pulled out of the
>negotiations in protest against the United Nations' condemnation of its
>missile tests.
>
>In 1999 this writer spoke with a former US Ambassador to Beijing, a career
>CIA officer and close friend of the Bush family. The former diplomat
>stated, in an incautious moment, "If North Korea did not exist, we would
>have to create it. They allow us to keep our fleet in the Japanese waters
>despite the end of the Cold War." Perhaps the sudden heating up of Korea
>tensions is also related to a longer-term Pentagon agenda for the region.
>If we ask Cui Bono, the clear reply is Washington.
>
>Note {1} Alexander Vorontsov, The Conundrum of the South Korean Corvette,
>RIA Novosti, Moscow (May 26 2010).
>
>_____
>
>F William Engdahl, author, Full Spectrum Dominance: Totalitarian Democracy
>in the New World Order (2009).
>
>Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are the sole
>responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of the
>Centre for Research on Globalization. The contents of this article are of
>sole responsibility of the author(s). The Centre for Research on
>Globalization will not be responsible or liable for any inaccurate or
>incorrect statements contained in this article.
>
>To become a Member of Global Research:
>http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=section&sectionName=membership
>
>The CRG grants permission to cross-post original Global Research articles
>on community internet sites as long as the text & title are not modified.
>The source and the author's copyright must be displayed. For publication
>of Global Research articles in print or other forms including commercial
>internet sites, contact: crgeditor at yahoo.com
>
>www.globalresearch.ca contains copyrighted material the use of which has
>not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are
>making such material available to our readers under the provisions of
>"fair use" in an effort to advance a better understanding of political,
>economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed
>without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving
>it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted
>material for purposes other than "fair use" you must request permission
>from the copyright owner.
>
>For media inquiries: crgeditor at yahoo.com
>
>(c) Copyright F William Engdahl, Global Research, 2010
>
>(c) Copyright 2005-2007 GlobalResearch.ca
>
>http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=ENG20100531&articleId=19437
>
>http://www.billtotten.blogspot.com
>http://www.ashisuto.co.jp
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: text/html
Size: 10701 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://greenhouse.economics.utah.edu/pipermail/a-list/attachments/20100601/8390a226/attachment.txt>