[A-List] Part 3: A Marxist Exposition on Man and Environment.

[Waistline2 at aol.com]

(Edited by Mevlin P. 

Note: Lots of Marx is quoted in the first two installments. Here is a comrade 
that takes his Marx very seriously.)  


The irreducible Unit and the Future of Woman. 

by Comrade Waistline. 


The hunter gathering society as the index – pivot and transition point of 
human evolution has been misunderstood by industrial man. Modern man or he to 
become homo-sapien-sapien appears between three hundred and fifty thousands and 
four hundred thousand years ago. He appears where his appearance can be made 
manifest. This man before means of production could not and did not emerge in 
the area of the North or South Pole. 

Production and consumption are realized one through the other. What has to be 
ascertained to pose the social question of properly is consumption without 
production. Repeat: consumption without production. 

Did man consume before he produced? Did man consume before the emergence of 
social relations of production? Did consumption give rise to means of 
production and social relations? What is the specific character of consumption that 
gave rise to means of production? 

The solution slowly emerges but it reformulates the question. What is the 
specific character of the “market pattern?” This is a question of biology and 
botany and not the economic factor that reproduces what is in fact a distortion. 
The solution is too obvious to understand. 

“Got Milk?” 

    This innocent advertisement slogan in the American Union contains all of 
history and what is wrong with our present bourgeois society. What species 
drink the milk from another being other than its mother? The problem is a 
historically evolved form of consumption. The bourgeoisie did not create the specific 
character of the “market pattern” – actual consumption. The bourgeoisie 
reproduces in an ever widening scope “something” that predates its emergence as a 
class. 

As we approach the bright communist future, means of production requires man 
to fashion them in such a manner that they reproduce – as best as possible, 
the inherent law systems of earth and also requires man to refashion them on the 
basis of man as environment as opposed to an independent agent in 
environment. Production and consumption has to be grasped as a unity.

The “environmentalists” are absolutely incorrect and have not grasped the 
issue at its root. 
Here is the presentation of the question in a manner so obvious that seven 
thousand years on history will collapse on itself. 

It is surely theoretically correct that man was a mere fruit eater in times 
gone by  – before mean of production begin emergence, and biologically correct, 
that he can be this today in the here and now. Or has the horse sense of man 
been so dulled by thousands of years of wrong consumption to no longer 
conceive without any direct proof, of the fact that man lived and had a material life 
before he became a hunter?  This prehistory man lived in more than less 
perfect health. This prehistory man had a brain and sense perception or what is in 
fact the power of observation. What did he consume to live and reproduce 
himself before the modern invention of the carrot and incomplete molecular 
structures we – you and everyone else, incorrectly call “food.” 

Yes, there is a scientific formulation of the question on the basis of the al
kaline structure of properties man ingests - consume. Please keep consumption 
and production in place as a unity.  This is another level of discourse and 
right now the task is to slay the critical realists and metaphysics of 
properties.

Does this form of exposition give meaning to the concept “the specific 
character of the market pattern?” 

I am going to have to write this exposition at least a million times in 
different ways. What need be noted is that the revolutionaries generated on the 
basis of 1967 Detroit and of course the historic Watts Rebellion of 1965, entered 
the historical stream and grappled with every social question facing earth. 

Everything is involved. We know that. This means we had to look at 
everything. I am the first to enter the world of discourse with our conclusions – as 
they evolved, from thirty years ago. Until one grasp that ours is the fight to 
the death hesitation remains. 

I maintain that man lived in perfect and absolute health before the coming of 
means of production.  This perfect and absolute health is based in a 
definable consumption pattern. It is valid to ask for proof but I shall offer none – 
(although I have compiled the literature in the course of a decade to verify my 
point of view), because your cranium cannot accept an excursion into the art 
of the obvious. 

I will not surrender to the ideological precepts of bourgeois chauvinists. 
The chauvinists must prove their point – not I. I assert that man lived before 
the formation of the hunter gathering society. I tell you this man ate fruit or 
consumed from his environment in rhythm – harmony, with a natural and 
instinctively understood the law system of his reproduction.

 I maintain that the structure of his nose allowed him to consume nitrates 
from the air. Women are so perfect that she can live on only one kind fruit. A 
self evident fact of nature preached by the earth cannot be disregarded because 
modern society lacks the consciousness to apply the truth of pre-history. 

You and everyone else have not understood hair and why poets have written of 
hair for thousands of years. Hair is a sex organ and genetic marker that 
indicated to the man before history the smell of his mate. The bald head man of 
today is blasphemy and a sign of genetic decay based on wrong consumption. 

You and all the so-called Marxists in the imperial centers, reduce 
consumption, production, reproduction and distribution to so much abstractions. Analyze 
what it is that is being reproduced as food stuff, the basis for the 
reproduction of the workers as workers and the solution unfolds itself. The basis of 
the reproduction of the workers as a class - wages, is not the infrastructure 
but foodstuff. 

Bourgeois property did not create wrong consumption but reproduces it in an 
every widening scope. Wrong consumption predates the bourgeoisie by several 
thousand years. Study the emergence of spices and their function. For Christ sake 
do you not understand the meaning of "sauce" and the chemical components to 
cover decay? Then the bourgeoisie adds to the evil by reproducing in a widening 
scale that that cannot combine with the cell structure.  

Everything that you and everyone else calls “food” and “prepared” by man on 
the basis of his means of production is only so much evil. Here is my problem 
with the Metropolitan Marxists. They cannot see beyond their sandwich or what 
is in fact the specific character of their consumption. The problem is not 
the means of production but the specific character of their deployment. The 
property relations within the mode of production are the salient feature of 
another historical process. 

The hunter/gathering society is an aberration. One must presuppose a crisis 
on earth that tears man from his place of emergence and cast him into a hostile 
environment that requires mobilization of the land. In Biblical words the 
Adam was hurled unto the earth as a tiller of the land. Why? Why does the earth 
have to be tilled? 

The inescapable loop of logic tightens. Meat is not a foodstuff but only a 
stimulant which ferments, decays in the stomach, the process of decay, however 
does not begin in the stomach, but at once after the slaughtering. Meat acts as 
a stimulant to the human organism by means of poisoning the system with decay 
and this stimulating impact is erroneously regarded as a strengthening 
foodstuff. Or is there anyone that can show me the chemical-physiological of the 
body – blood, which converts an inorganic molecule into an organic molecule and 
merges with the molecular structure of man. 

We consume the earth because of ignorance of law systems and the bourgeois 
property relation reproduces this wrong consumption in an ever widening scope. 
Here is the irreducible unit that appears as man hitting the thermodynamic 
barrier. 

You do not believe me because of the obviousness of the proposition. 

Then why is the number one cause of death in America obesity? If 
over-consumption (obesity) is the problem, the solution is contained in identifying the 
problem. The problem is not the barrier of thermodynamics. Here is where comrade 
Mark Jones – and others, misunderstand and incorrectly pose the problem. The 
problem is the specific character of the market pattern – not production, 
consumption and distribution.  The specific character of the market pattern is 
made manifest on the basis of production, consumption and distribution of that 
which is being reproduced in an ever widening scope. 

Once the issue of man is grasped at its root – the irreducible unit, the 
vision of the future society is radically altered. The thousand year war is 
unfolding. Clearing the stage of history of property forms set the basis to realign 
man rhythm with that of the earth. 

Once the premise – the irreducible unit, is understood all of history is 
realigned and made understandable. The carrying capacity of the earth – a 
bourgeois concept, presupposes a proposition that minimally clarify, to one degree or 
another, an equation outlining “capacity” and the law of population growth. 
Population growth – sexual reproduction of the species, and the quality of 
human beings produced is governed by what is consumed. 

Wrong consumption produces one result and right consumption produces another 
result. 
In Biblical language it takes seven generations to purify man but this 
presupposes a conscious understanding of consumption. “I am the Lord Thy Physician” 
or Savior.  Why is it that every Prophet in every culture on earth fasted or 
ate very little? Why it is that every prophetic vision in every culture on 
earth is connected with fasting and little consumption? Why is it “better to give 
than receive” or consume? Why is it that capitalism in agriculture cannot be 
reckoned with the life cycle of the earth? 

The base line of the material mobilization of the land is for direct 
consumption and not exchange. The environmentalists must come to grips with the 
property relations. The idea that the communists and Marxist have miss-formulated 
the question is wrong. The question was formulated on the basis of a given state 
of development in the quantitative boundary of the expansion of the 
industrial system. Today we are at another stage in the development of the 
technological regime and the question is reformulated fifty years in front of the 
bourgeois “greens.”  

I can explain our haste and neglect of the earth in our march to build up a 
military strike force against bourgeois property. Our haste had absolutely 
nothing to do with the form of property in the Soviet Union and everything to do 
with your bourgeoisie.