[A-List] Part 3: A Marxist Exposition on Man and Environment.
Waistline2 at aol.com
Waistline2 at aol.com
Thu Mar 18 13:57:24 MST 2004
(Edited by Mevlin P.
Note: Lots of Marx is quoted in the first two installments. Here is a comrade
that takes his Marx very seriously.)
The irreducible Unit and the Future of Woman.
by Comrade Waistline.
The hunter gathering society as the index – pivot and transition point of
human evolution has been misunderstood by industrial man. Modern man or he to
become homo-sapien-sapien appears between three hundred and fifty thousands and
four hundred thousand years ago. He appears where his appearance can be made
manifest. This man before means of production could not and did not emerge in
the area of the North or South Pole.
Production and consumption are realized one through the other. What has to be
ascertained to pose the social question of properly is consumption without
production. Repeat: consumption without production.
Did man consume before he produced? Did man consume before the emergence of
social relations of production? Did consumption give rise to means of
production and social relations? What is the specific character of consumption that
gave rise to means of production?
The solution slowly emerges but it reformulates the question. What is the
specific character of the “market pattern?” This is a question of biology and
botany and not the economic factor that reproduces what is in fact a distortion.
The solution is too obvious to understand.
This innocent advertisement slogan in the American Union contains all of
history and what is wrong with our present bourgeois society. What species
drink the milk from another being other than its mother? The problem is a
historically evolved form of consumption. The bourgeoisie did not create the specific
character of the “market pattern” – actual consumption. The bourgeoisie
reproduces in an ever widening scope “something” that predates its emergence as a
As we approach the bright communist future, means of production requires man
to fashion them in such a manner that they reproduce – as best as possible,
the inherent law systems of earth and also requires man to refashion them on the
basis of man as environment as opposed to an independent agent in
environment. Production and consumption has to be grasped as a unity.
The “environmentalists” are absolutely incorrect and have not grasped the
issue at its root.
Here is the presentation of the question in a manner so obvious that seven
thousand years on history will collapse on itself.
It is surely theoretically correct that man was a mere fruit eater in times
gone by – before mean of production begin emergence, and biologically correct,
that he can be this today in the here and now. Or has the horse sense of man
been so dulled by thousands of years of wrong consumption to no longer
conceive without any direct proof, of the fact that man lived and had a material life
before he became a hunter? This prehistory man lived in more than less
perfect health. This prehistory man had a brain and sense perception or what is in
fact the power of observation. What did he consume to live and reproduce
himself before the modern invention of the carrot and incomplete molecular
structures we – you and everyone else, incorrectly call “food.”
Yes, there is a scientific formulation of the question on the basis of the al
kaline structure of properties man ingests - consume. Please keep consumption
and production in place as a unity. This is another level of discourse and
right now the task is to slay the critical realists and metaphysics of
Does this form of exposition give meaning to the concept “the specific
character of the market pattern?”
I am going to have to write this exposition at least a million times in
different ways. What need be noted is that the revolutionaries generated on the
basis of 1967 Detroit and of course the historic Watts Rebellion of 1965, entered
the historical stream and grappled with every social question facing earth.
Everything is involved. We know that. This means we had to look at
everything. I am the first to enter the world of discourse with our conclusions – as
they evolved, from thirty years ago. Until one grasp that ours is the fight to
the death hesitation remains.
I maintain that man lived in perfect and absolute health before the coming of
means of production. This perfect and absolute health is based in a
definable consumption pattern. It is valid to ask for proof but I shall offer none –
(although I have compiled the literature in the course of a decade to verify my
point of view), because your cranium cannot accept an excursion into the art
of the obvious.
I will not surrender to the ideological precepts of bourgeois chauvinists.
The chauvinists must prove their point – not I. I assert that man lived before
the formation of the hunter gathering society. I tell you this man ate fruit or
consumed from his environment in rhythm – harmony, with a natural and
instinctively understood the law system of his reproduction.
I maintain that the structure of his nose allowed him to consume nitrates
from the air. Women are so perfect that she can live on only one kind fruit. A
self evident fact of nature preached by the earth cannot be disregarded because
modern society lacks the consciousness to apply the truth of pre-history.
You and everyone else have not understood hair and why poets have written of
hair for thousands of years. Hair is a sex organ and genetic marker that
indicated to the man before history the smell of his mate. The bald head man of
today is blasphemy and a sign of genetic decay based on wrong consumption.
You and all the so-called Marxists in the imperial centers, reduce
consumption, production, reproduction and distribution to so much abstractions. Analyze
what it is that is being reproduced as food stuff, the basis for the
reproduction of the workers as workers and the solution unfolds itself. The basis of
the reproduction of the workers as a class - wages, is not the infrastructure
Bourgeois property did not create wrong consumption but reproduces it in an
every widening scope. Wrong consumption predates the bourgeoisie by several
thousand years. Study the emergence of spices and their function. For Christ sake
do you not understand the meaning of "sauce" and the chemical components to
cover decay? Then the bourgeoisie adds to the evil by reproducing in a widening
scale that that cannot combine with the cell structure.
Everything that you and everyone else calls “food” and “prepared” by man on
the basis of his means of production is only so much evil. Here is my problem
with the Metropolitan Marxists. They cannot see beyond their sandwich or what
is in fact the specific character of their consumption. The problem is not
the means of production but the specific character of their deployment. The
property relations within the mode of production are the salient feature of
another historical process.
The hunter/gathering society is an aberration. One must presuppose a crisis
on earth that tears man from his place of emergence and cast him into a hostile
environment that requires mobilization of the land. In Biblical words the
Adam was hurled unto the earth as a tiller of the land. Why? Why does the earth
have to be tilled?
The inescapable loop of logic tightens. Meat is not a foodstuff but only a
stimulant which ferments, decays in the stomach, the process of decay, however
does not begin in the stomach, but at once after the slaughtering. Meat acts as
a stimulant to the human organism by means of poisoning the system with decay
and this stimulating impact is erroneously regarded as a strengthening
foodstuff. Or is there anyone that can show me the chemical-physiological of the
body – blood, which converts an inorganic molecule into an organic molecule and
merges with the molecular structure of man.
We consume the earth because of ignorance of law systems and the bourgeois
property relation reproduces this wrong consumption in an ever widening scope.
Here is the irreducible unit that appears as man hitting the thermodynamic
You do not believe me because of the obviousness of the proposition.
Then why is the number one cause of death in America obesity? If
over-consumption (obesity) is the problem, the solution is contained in identifying the
problem. The problem is not the barrier of thermodynamics. Here is where comrade
Mark Jones – and others, misunderstand and incorrectly pose the problem. The
problem is the specific character of the market pattern – not production,
consumption and distribution. The specific character of the market pattern is
made manifest on the basis of production, consumption and distribution of that
which is being reproduced in an ever widening scope.
Once the issue of man is grasped at its root – the irreducible unit, the
vision of the future society is radically altered. The thousand year war is
unfolding. Clearing the stage of history of property forms set the basis to realign
man rhythm with that of the earth.
Once the premise – the irreducible unit, is understood all of history is
realigned and made understandable. The carrying capacity of the earth – a
bourgeois concept, presupposes a proposition that minimally clarify, to one degree or
another, an equation outlining “capacity” and the law of population growth.
Population growth – sexual reproduction of the species, and the quality of
human beings produced is governed by what is consumed.
Wrong consumption produces one result and right consumption produces another
In Biblical language it takes seven generations to purify man but this
presupposes a conscious understanding of consumption. “I am the Lord Thy Physician”
or Savior. Why is it that every Prophet in every culture on earth fasted or
ate very little? Why it is that every prophetic vision in every culture on
earth is connected with fasting and little consumption? Why is it “better to give
than receive” or consume? Why is it that capitalism in agriculture cannot be
reckoned with the life cycle of the earth?
The base line of the material mobilization of the land is for direct
consumption and not exchange. The environmentalists must come to grips with the
property relations. The idea that the communists and Marxist have miss-formulated
the question is wrong. The question was formulated on the basis of a given state
of development in the quantitative boundary of the expansion of the
industrial system. Today we are at another stage in the development of the
technological regime and the question is reformulated fifty years in front of the
I can explain our haste and neglect of the earth in our march to build up a
military strike force against bourgeois property. Our haste had absolutely
nothing to do with the form of property in the Soviet Union and everything to do
with your bourgeoisie.
More information about the A-List